Fig. 4.
Dotplot for prolonged time to extubation for cases ending January 1, 2012 through (and including) December 31, 2013, and classified by anesthesia provider (resident or nurse anesthetist) according to the adjusted Bayesian model. Each anesthesia provider’s prior probability of being an outlier was set equal to 5%. One provider was detected as having significantly greater adjusted incidence of prolonged time to extubation than the other providers with strong evidence (Bayes factor [BF]70 = 0.08). There were five anesthesia providers with a significantly less incidence of tracheal extubations than other anesthesia providers; two with decisive evidence (BF23 = 0.008, BF24 = 0.0009), two with very strong evidence (BF15 = 0.010, BF18 = 0.016), and one with strong evidence (BF4 = 0.06). Incidences of prolonged times to extubations for these providers were between 2.32 and 6.80%.

Dotplot for prolonged time to extubation for cases ending January 1, 2012 through (and including) December 31, 2013, and classified by anesthesia provider (resident or nurse anesthetist) according to the adjusted Bayesian model. Each anesthesia provider’s prior probability of being an outlier was set equal to 5%. One provider was detected as having significantly greater adjusted incidence of prolonged time to extubation than the other providers with strong evidence (Bayes factor [BF]70 = 0.08). There were five anesthesia providers with a significantly less incidence of tracheal extubations than other anesthesia providers; two with decisive evidence (BF23 = 0.008, BF24 = 0.0009), two with very strong evidence (BF15 = 0.010, BF18 = 0.016), and one with strong evidence (BF4 = 0.06). Incidences of prolonged times to extubations for these providers were between 2.32 and 6.80%.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal