Fig. 3. These histograms display the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) values obtained in 500 replicates. The increment size between concentration changes was 20% of the starting concentration. In the upper panel, the starting concentration for each replicate was 0.5% (with an increment size of 0.1%); in the lower panel, the starting concentration for each replicate was 1.5% (with an increment size of 0.3%). The lower starting concentration produced a slight bias toward smaller estimates for MAC (60% of values were < 1.0%). Because increment size is a function of the starting concentration, increment size for the lower panel is larger, presumably explaining gaps in the distribution in that panel.

Fig. 3. These histograms display the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) values obtained in 500 replicates. The increment size between concentration changes was 20% of the starting concentration. In the upper panel, the starting concentration for each replicate was 0.5% (with an increment size of 0.1%); in the lower panel, the starting concentration for each replicate was 1.5% (with an increment size of 0.3%). The lower starting concentration produced a slight bias toward smaller estimates for MAC (60% of values were < 1.0%). Because increment size is a function of the starting concentration, increment size for the lower panel is larger, presumably explaining gaps in the distribution in that panel.

Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal