Background

Rapid progress is being made in fetal surgery. Because the fetus is capable of pain perception after the 26th week of gestation, adequate postoperative fetal pain management is essential. The preferred approach would provide fetal analgesia without affecting the mother. Intraamniotically administered sufentanil may be an interesting option if it achieves therapeutic plasma concentrations (PCs) in the fetus but not the mother.

Methods

After approval of the study, 25 or 50 microg sufentanil was administered intraamniotically in 10 chronically instrumented pregnant ewes. Maternal and fetal vital signs, arterial blood gases, and uterine blood flow were recorded over 120 min. Sufentanil PCs were determined before and 1, 3, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 min after injection. Statistical analysis was performed using one- or two-way analysis of variance followed by Dunnett or Tukey test, as appropriate (P < 0.05; data presented as median [95% confidence interval]).

Results

After 25 microg sufentanil, fetal PC stabilized at 134 +/- 89 pg/ml (after 10 min), and maternal PCs stabilized at 44 +/- 11 pg/ml (after 15 min). After 50 microg sufentanil, fetal PCs stabilized at 134 +/- 35 pg/ml (after 15 min), and maternal PCs reached 80 +/- 25 pg/ml (at 30 min). Injection of 25 microg sufentanil intraamniotically did not affect maternal or fetal hemodynamics, uterine blood flow, or arterial blood gases. Fetal heart rate increased after administration of 50 microg sufentanil (maximum change at 10 min: +16 +/- 12%).

Conclusion

The sheep fetus absorbs sufentanil after intraamniotic instillation. Significantly greater PCs were obtained in the fetal lamb as compared with the ewe. This suggests that investigation of intraamniotic opioids for fetal analgesia might be worthwhile.

This article is featured in “This Month in Anesthesiology.” Please see this issue of Anesthesiology, page 5A.

BECAUSE of a rapid increase in diagnostic and therapeutic options, life-threatening fetal malformations, or those that have a devastating outcome if treatment is postponed until after birth, are now accessible to treat in utero . 1,2Animal data and first case reports show promising results in treating, for instance, certain congenital heart diseases, 3,4twin-reversed arterial perfusion, 5–7diaphragmatic hernias, 8–10bronchopulmonary malformations, 11urinary tract obstruction, 12,13and myelomenigoceles. 14 

Fetal analgesia has become a major issue in fetal surgery since it was shown that noxious stimuli are transmitted as early as the 26th gestational week. 15However, adequate fetal postoperative analgesia cannot be achieved easily. Use of fetal local or regional anesthesia has not been described. Intravenous administration of analgesics to the mother in concentrations required to achieve adequate fetal plasma concentrations risks undesired maternal side effects. This is of particular concern because only the fetus, and not the mother, needs the drug. Although direct intramuscular or intravenous administration of opioids to the fetus is in routine use in some centers, it potentially risks bleeding as well as cord tamponade and arterial spasm.

Because access to the amniotic cavity is already established through the surgical intervention, analgesics might be administered into the amniotic fluid. This would expose primarily the fetus to the drug. Previous experimental and clinical studies have shown that intraamniotically applied digoxin, 16vasopressin, 17steroids, 18or thyroxine 19is absorbed by the fetus. However, it is not known whether administration of analgesics using this technique leads to appreciable blood concentrations in the fetus or whether measurable blood concentrations are built up in the mother.

We hypothesized that intraamniotically applied analgesics induce greater blood concentrations in the fetus than in the mother. To test our hypothesis, we determined fetal and maternal sufentanil plasma concentrations after intraamniotic administration of sufentanil in chronically instrumented pregnant sheep. This established model allows continuous monitoring and plasma sampling in an awake animal (i.e. , no interference with anesthetics). We used sufentanil in our study because it is a highly lipid-soluble compound, suggesting easy passage through fetal skin (or gastrointestinal tract) and transmembranous absorption. As an additional benefit, sufentanil passes the placental barrier to a lesser extent than does fentanyl. 20–22Our findings indicate that intraamniotically applied sufentanil results in substantial plasma concentrations in the fetus, whereas maternal plasma concentrations remain low.

Experimental Animals and Instrumentation

The study protocol was approved by the local committee on animal research of the University of Münster and follows the guidelines for the provision of standard care to laboratory animals. We studied 10 time-bred pregnant ewes weighing between 56 and 80 kg (mean, 66.2 ± 8.5 kg) with a mean gestational age of 120 days (range, 118–122 days; term average, 145 days).

Mother and fetus were instrumented as described previously. 21Briefly, polyvinyl catheters were placed under general anesthesia into the maternal external jugular vein and carotid artery as well as into the fetal caval vein and aortic artery via  the tibial vein and artery. A well-fitting 20-MHz pulsed Doppler flow probe (Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; ID 4.0–6.0 mm) was secured around a branch of the uterine artery supplying the pregnant horn of the uterus and used for measurement of uterine blood flow. An additional catheter was placed in the amniotic fluid cavity and secured to a fetal hind limb for drug administration and amniotic pressure measurements. Estimated intraoperative amniotic fluid loss was replaced with warmed sterile saline, the uterus was closed, and all catheters were tunneled subcutaneously. Catheters were irrigated daily with sterile heparinized saline; animals were allowed free access to water and standard sheep food and received prophylactic antibiotics (cefamandole, gentamicin) daily.

Maternal mean arterial pressure, maternal heart rate, amniotic fluid pressure, fetal mean arterial pressure, and fetal heart rate were measured using a disposable strain gauge (Eco Trans DPT-7003; pvb Medizintechnik, Kirchseeon, Germany). Fetal mean arterial pressure was adjusted by subtracting amniotic fluid pressure. Uterine blood flow data were represented as kHz Doppler shift. Arterial blood samples for maternal and fetal blood gases as well as acid–base status were processed immediately after sampling (ABL 505; Radiometer, Copenhagen, Denmark) and corrected for maternal temperature (39°C; normal temperature for sheep). The blood gas analyzer was calibrated daily with reference liquid samples (Multicheck; Radiometer).

Experimental Design

The animals were studied in standing position in a study trolley. Each experiment was preceded by a period of 30 min, during which baseline hemodynamic conditions were obtained. We studied two sufentanil treatments: 25 and 50 μg intraamniotically. A time period of at least 48 h separated each treatment, and each animal received each treatment, in randomized order, thereby acting as its own control. We did not include a control group because the repeated fetal blood sampling might adversely affect fetal status.

Maternal mean arterial blood pressure, maternal heart rate, amniotic fluid pressure, fetal mean arterial blood pressure, and fetal heart rate were recorded before and 1, 3, 5, 10, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 min after injection of the test compound. Venous blood samples (2 ml each) for determination of fetal and maternal sufentanil plasma concentrations were drawn at the same time. Associated blood loss was replaced with 2 ml saline. After centrifugation (1,500 g , 10 min), plasma samples were kept frozen at −20°C until analysis. Maternal and fetal arterial blood gases and acid–base status were determined before and 5, 15, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after drug administration. Animals were euthanized with propofol and potassium chloride after the final experiment, and fetal body weight was obtained. Mean fetal body weight at autopsy varied between 2.5 and 5.0 kg (mean, 3.35 ± 0.7 kg), resulting in dosages of 7.5 and 15.0 μg/kg sufentanil, respectively.

Sufentanil Concentration Assay

Sufentanil dihydrogen citrate was obtained from Janssen-Cilag, Neuss, Germany. Fetal and maternal sufentanil plasma concentrations were determined using HPLC-MS (series 1100; Hewlett-Packard, Wilmington, DE). Samples were mixed with 2 ml n-butylchloride, shaken for 60 min, centrifuged (1,500 g , 10 min), and frozen using dry ice for 15 min. After evaporation to dryness (continuous nitrogen flow, 45°C), the extraction residues were dissolved in 100 μl acetonitrile–water (73/27), and 50-μl aliquots were injected into the column. Chromatographic separation was achieved on an RP select B, Lichrospher 60, 250 × 3.5-μm column (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and C18 guard cartridge, using as mobile phase a 0.1% formic acid in a water-soluble acetonitrile–water gradient (820 μl/l, 73/27 v/v, 0.7 ml/min). The column oven temperature was 40°C. Detection of sufentanil was performed using mass spectrometry (MS-ESI, SIM). Standard curves were prepared by spiking sheep plasma with sufentanil (MW 387.2) at concentrations ranging from 0.0 to 7 ng/ml and with fentanyl (MW 337.2) as an internal standard at a concentration of 10 ng/ml. As an intraassay control, sheep plasma, spiked with 0.2 pg/ml sufentanil, was included with each batch of study samples.

Statistical Analysis

Changes over the time and between groups were analyzed by one- or two-way analysis of variance for repeated measurements, as appropriate, followed by Dunnett or Tukey test, respectively. If data were not normally distributed, Friedman repeated-measures analysis of variance on ranks was performed. A P  value less than 0.05 was considered to be significant. Plasma concentrations are presented as median (95% confidence interval); all other data are presented as mean ± SEM.

A total of 12 animals were operated on. One ewe aspirated during emergence from anesthesia and was euthanized the next day; one fetus died 12 h after the procedure for unknown reasons. Eighteen treatments were performed in the remaining 10 sheep. In one case, the fetal arterial line clotted; therefore, only one treatment could be performed in this animal. One ewe had diarrhea and was excluded from one experiment. Moderate bleeding in one case from a uterine cotyledon during the operation did not interfere with experiments. Four samples were lost because of breakdown of the freezer. Successful plasma sample analysis was performed in seven cases in the 25-μg group and in seven cases in the 50-μg group.

Effects of Intraamniotic Sufentanil on Maternal Plasma Concentrations and Hemodynamics

After 25 μg intraamniotic sufentanil, maternal sufentanil plasma concentrations stabilized after 15 min at 44 (33–55) pg/ml (fig. 1, top ). Fifty micrograms sufentanil intraamniotically tended to induce greater maternal blood concentrations (94 [65–123] pg/ml) compared with 25 μg sufentanil, but these were not significantly different. The initial increase took place in the same time frame (within 15 min;fig. 1, bottom ). The highest concentration measured after 25 μg intraamniotic sufentanil was 76 pg/ml after 90 min. This same ewe achieved the highest plasma concentrations after 50 μg sufentanil intraamniotically (163 pg/ml after 45 min).

Fig. 1. (Top ) Changes in maternal sufentanil plasma concentrations (pg/ml) after 25 μg intraamniotic sufentanil over time; n = 7;superimposed thick line = median; *P < 0.05 versus  0 min. (Bottom ) Changes of maternal sufentanil plasma concentrations (pg/ml) after 50 μg intraamniotic sufentanil over time; n = 7;superimposed thick line = median; *P < 0.05 versus  0 min; #P < 0.05 versus  fetus 50 μg intraamniotically.

Fig. 1. (Top ) Changes in maternal sufentanil plasma concentrations (pg/ml) after 25 μg intraamniotic sufentanil over time; n = 7;superimposed thick line = median; *P < 0.05 versus  0 min. (Bottom ) Changes of maternal sufentanil plasma concentrations (pg/ml) after 50 μg intraamniotic sufentanil over time; n = 7;superimposed thick line = median; *P < 0.05 versus  0 min; #P < 0.05 versus  fetus 50 μg intraamniotically.

Close modal

Neither 25 nor 50 μg intraamniotic sufentanil induced significant changes in maternal arterial pressure or heart rate (tables 1 and 2). Uterine blood flow, as an indicator of fetal supply, did not change significantly (fig. 2). Arterial blood gases and acid–base status remained unchanged in both groups, indicating that maternal respiratory depression did not occur (tables 1 and 2).

Table 1. Maternal Hemodynamics and Arterial Blood Gases after 25 μg Intraamniotic Sufentanil

Maternal mean arterial blood pressure (MMAP; mmHg), maternal heart rate (MHR; min−1), maternal arterial pH, Pco2; mmHg), and Po2; mmHg) after 25 μg intraamniotic sufentanil. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; not significant.

Table 1. Maternal Hemodynamics and Arterial Blood Gases after 25 μg Intraamniotic Sufentanil
Table 1. Maternal Hemodynamics and Arterial Blood Gases after 25 μg Intraamniotic Sufentanil

Table 2. Maternal Hemodynamics and Arterial Blood Gases after 50 μg Intraamniotic Sufentanil

Maternal mean arterial blood pressure (MMAP; mmHg), maternal heart rate (MHR; min−1), maternal arterial pH, Pco2; mmHg), and Po2; mmHg) after 50 μg intraamniotic sufentanil. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; not significant.

Table 2. Maternal Hemodynamics and Arterial Blood Gases after 50 μg Intraamniotic Sufentanil
Table 2. Maternal Hemodynamics and Arterial Blood Gases after 50 μg Intraamniotic Sufentanil

Fig. 2. Effects of 25 or 50 μg intraamniotic sufentanil on uterine blood flow (kHz); n = 10; mean ± SEM; not significant.

Fig. 2. Effects of 25 or 50 μg intraamniotic sufentanil on uterine blood flow (kHz); n = 10; mean ± SEM; not significant.

Close modal

Effects of Intraamniotic Sufentanil on Fetal Plasma Concentrations and Hemodynamics

After 25 μg intraamniotic sufentanil, fetal plasma concentrations were achieved within the first 10 min (144 [73–215] pg/ml;fig. 3, top ). Fetal heart rate tended to increase from 162 ± 5 to 179 ± 7 min−1(+10%) after 5 min and subsequently declined (120 min: 169 ± 7 min−1). Fetal blood pressure was not affected (table 3). Sufentanil plasma concentrations did not peak earlier after 50 μg intraamniotic sufentanil compared with 25 μg and did not achieve significant higher plateau levels (maximum 175 [113–237] pg/ml at 60 min). Fetal heart rate increased from 154 ± 5 to 179 ± 7 min−1(+16%) after 10 min and declined gradually to 161 ± 8 min−1by the end of the study period. Again, arterial pressure did not change significantly (table 4). One fetus (belonging to the ewe with maximal plasma concentrations) reached maximal concentrations of 566 pg/ml 60 min after receiving 25 μg sufentanil intraamniotically. When receiving 50 μg intraamniotic sufentanil, the same fetus achieved maximal plasma concentrations of 508 pg/ml after 30 min (fig. 3, bottom ).

Fig. 3. (Top ) Changes of fetal sufentanil plasma concentrations (pg/ml) after 25 μg intraamniotic sufentanil over time; n = 7;superimposed thick line = median; *P < 0.05 versus  0 min. (Bottom ) Changes of fetal sufentanil plasma concentrations (pg/ml) after 50 μg intraamniotic sufentanil over time; n = 7;superimposed thick line = median; *P < 0.05 versus  0 min.

Fig. 3. (Top ) Changes of fetal sufentanil plasma concentrations (pg/ml) after 25 μg intraamniotic sufentanil over time; n = 7;superimposed thick line = median; *P < 0.05 versus  0 min. (Bottom ) Changes of fetal sufentanil plasma concentrations (pg/ml) after 50 μg intraamniotic sufentanil over time; n = 7;superimposed thick line = median; *P < 0.05 versus  0 min.

Close modal

Table 3. Fetal Hemodynamics and Arterial Blood Gases after 25 μg Intraamniotic Sufentanil

Fetal mean arterial blood pressure (FMAP; mmHg), fetal heart rate (FHR; min−1), fetal arterial pH, Pco2; mmHg), and Po2; mmHg) after 25 μg intraamniotic sufentanil. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; not significant.

Table 3. Fetal Hemodynamics and Arterial Blood Gases after 25 μg Intraamniotic Sufentanil
Table 3. Fetal Hemodynamics and Arterial Blood Gases after 25 μg Intraamniotic Sufentanil

Table 4. Fetal Hemodynamics and Arterial Blood Gases after 50 μg Intraamniotic Sufentanil

Fetal mean arterial blood pressure (FMAP; mmHg), fetal heart rate (FHR; min−1), fetal arterial pH, Pco2; mmHg), and Po2; mmHg) after 50 μg intraamniotic sufentanil. Data are presented as mean ± SEM.

*P < 0.05 versus  0 min.

Table 4. Fetal Hemodynamics and Arterial Blood Gases after 50 μg Intraamniotic Sufentanil
Table 4. Fetal Hemodynamics and Arterial Blood Gases after 50 μg Intraamniotic Sufentanil

pH, Pco2, and Po2did not change significantly in either group (tables 3 and 4).

Our study demonstrates that administration of sufentanil intraamniotically induces plasma concentrations in the fetal lamb comparable to therapeutic concentrations in humans, which last for at least 120 min; plasma concentrations in the ewe were significantly less. No adverse hemodynamic maternal affects were observed.

Noxious stimuli to the fetus induce a rise in cortisol and β-endorphin levels and induce vigorous movements and breathing efforts. 23Final thalamocortical connections, the anatomical correlate of pain perception, form at the 26th week of gestation. 15Even earlier, nociceptive experience may be transmitted via  transient thalamocortical fibers. 24Indeed, because descending inhibitory pathways are not formed until birth, the fetus might be even more sensitive to painful stimuli. Human fetuses elaborate pituitary–adrenal, sympathoadrenal, and circulatory stress responses to physical insults as early as 18–20 gestational weeks. 23,25–27Even if noxious stimuli are not consciously perceived, they can nevertheless influence sensory development. 28Acute stress in fetuses or neonates can lead to permanent behavioral changes. 29–32Circumcisions performed in nonanesthetized neonates increased the pain response to injections 6 months later. 33Thus, fetal analgesia should be considered for all invasive procedures. However, because fetal surgical interventions range greatly in invasiveness (from minimally invasive procedures, such as blood sampling and in utero  transfusions, to fetoscopic procedures and invasive open fetal surgery requiring hysterotomy 34), the degree of postoperative fetal analgesia required depends on the procedure performed.

The chronically instrumented pregnant sheep preparation is an established model to study placental transfer. 35It permits serial fetal and maternal blood sampling and continuous recording of vital signs in an awake, unrestrained animal. Fetal size and development are comparable with that in humans. Nevertheless, extrapolation from animal data to humans should always be done with caution. Sheep have an epitheliochorial placenta, which is less permeable to hydrophilic compounds than the hemochorial placentas of primates and rodents. However, this difference should have a minor influence on the transfer of lipid-soluble compounds.

Previous investigations in animals and humans have demonstrated that several intraamniotically administered compounds readily gain access to the fetus. Gilbert et al.  17injected 1–25 μg arginine vasopressin intraamniotically in pregnant sheep (128 days’ gestation) and measured significant increases in vasopressin concentrations in fetal plasma and urine, as well as increases in fetal arterial and venous pressures and decreases in urine flow and heart rate. Intraamniotic administration of digoxin in pregnant sheep induced fetal plasma concentrations approximately 10 times greater than measured maternal concentrations. 16Cortisol is detectable in sheep fetal blood 30 min after intraamniotic administration. 36Intraamniotic thyroxine has been used to prevent infant respiratory distress syndrome in toxemic human pregnancies. 19Our findings extend these previous reports to a novel drug class.

The sustained fetal sufentanil plasma concentrations observed can have multiple reasons. During fetal development, blood flowing from the placenta partially bypasses the liver (through the ductus venosus arantius); in addition, fetal hepatic biotransformation pathways are immature. Whereas the distribution half-life of sufentanil does not seem to be age related (164 ± 69 min in adults 37; 187 ± 31 min in neonates, infants, children, and adolescents 38), the elimination half-life of sufentanil is increased threefold in neonates compared with the older population. 38 

Concentrations of α1-acid-glycoprotein in fetal plasma are 5–10 times lower than in adults. Near term, the fetal/maternal serum concentration ratio reaches 0.37. 39Therefore, a greater amount of the unbound (active) fraction is available in fetal plasma. 40This should be taken into account when interpreting our data, as we measured total serum sufentanil concentrations only and did not separate between bound and unbound fractions. Finally, our results might modestly underestimate the actual sufentanil plasma concentrations as samples were analyzed off-line and the sufentanil concentration decreases with storage time. 41 

The appropriate dosing for intraamniotic opiates is not known. Sheep are less sensitive to opioids than humans. Thus, the lack of observed hemodynamic responses to opioids in this study does not exclude hemodynamic side effects in humans, and we did not study antinociceptive effects of sufentanil in this model. Analgesic sufentanil concentrations in human fetuses have not been determined. In adults, minimal effective sufentanil concentrations in postoperative pain management ranged between 10 and 560 pg/ml, but a minimal concentration of 30 pg/ml seems to be necessary for a consistent response. 42In pediatric cardiovascular patients, plasma concentrations of sufentanil were determined at the time when additional anesthetic supplementation (after induction with 10–15 μg/kg sufentanil) was required to suppress hemodynamic responses to surgical stimulation. The measured concentration was 2.51 ng/ml in neonates, significantly higher than the concentrations of 1.58, 1.53, and 1.56 ng/ml observed in infants, children, and adolescents, respectively. 38However, all patients had cardiovascular diseases, which could have affected the dosages; the neonates did not receive premedication (but older patients did); and these concentrations were needed to suppress a surgical stimulus and do not represent postoperative needs. Corresponding fetal sufentanil plasma concentrations have not been evaluated so far.

Although fetal hemoglobin concentrations tended to decrease in both intraamniotic groups (as a sign of hemodilution), these changes were not significant. Fetal heart rate increased modestly after 50 μg sufentanil administration. However, because the study did not include a saline control group (which would have entailed more fetal blood sampling and possibly would have resulted in hemodynamic effects), we cannot determine whether the cause of this effect was the opioid or the intraamniotic injection.

In conclusion, we showed that the fetal lamb absorbs intraamniotic sufentanil and achieves significantly greater plasma concentrations than the ewe. Neither 25 nor 50 μg intraamniotic sufentanil adversely affected fetal or maternal hemodynamics. This suggests that intraamniotic administration of drugs may be a potential approach to provide postoperative anesthesia after fetal surgery.

The authors thank Stefan Brodner (Research Technician, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University of Münster, Germany) for expert technical assistance and Beate Vollenbroeker and Jan Hendrik Koch (Research Fellows, Department of Internal Medicine D, University of Münster) for analysis of the samples.

1.
Hubbard AM, Harty MP, States LJ: A new tool for prenatal diagnosis: Ultrafast fetal MRI. Semin Perinatol 1999; 23: 437–47
2.
Flake AW, Crombleholme TM, Adzick NS: The current status and future potential of fetal intervention: Image is everything. Comput Med Imaging Graph 1999; 23: 51–7
3.
Kohl T, Kirchhof PF, Gogarten W, Reckers J, Asfour B, Witteler R, Haverkamp W, Eckardt L, Marcus AE, VanAken H, Breithardt G, Vogt J, Scheld HH: Fetoscopic transesophageal electrocardiography and stimulation in fetal sheep: A minimally invasive approach aimed at diagnosis and termination of therapy-refractory supraventricular tachycardias in human fetuses. Circulation 1999; 100: 772–6
4.
Kohl T, Witteler R, Strumper D, Gogarten W, Asfour B, Reckers J, Merschhoff G, Marcus AE, Weyand M, Van Aken H, Vogt J, Scheld HH: Operative techniques and strategies for minimally invasive fetoscopic fetal cardiac interventions in sheep. Surg Endosc 2000; 14: 424–30
5.
Fries MH, Goldberg JD, Golbus MS: Treatment of acardiac-acephalus twin gestations by hysterotomy and selective delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1992; 79: 601–4
6.
Foley MR, Clewell WH, Finberg HJ, Mills MD: Use of the Foley Cordostat grasping device for selective ligation of the umbilical cord of an acardiac twin: A case report. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 172: 212–4
7.
Arias F, Sunderji S, Gimpelson R, Colton E: Treatment of acardiac twinning. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 91: 818–21
8.
Harrison MR, Adzick NS, Flake AW, Jennings RW, Estes JM, MacGillivray TE, Chueh JT, Goldberg JD, Filly RA, Goldstein RB: Correction of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in utero: VI. Hard-earned lessons. J Pediatr Surg 1993; 28: 1411–7, discussion 1417–8
9.
VanderWall KJ, Skarsgard ED, Filly RA, Eckert J, Harrison MR: Fetendo-clip: A fetal endoscopic tracheal clip procedure in a human fetus. J Pediatr Surg 1997; 32: 970–2
10.
Kitano Y, Flake AW, Crombleholme TM, Johnson MP, Adzick NS: Open fetal surgery for life-threatening fetal malformations. Semin Perinatol 1999; 23: 448–61
11.
Kitano Y, Adzick NS: New developments in fetal lung surgery. Curr Opin Pediatr 1999; 11: 193–9
12.
Harrison MR, Nakayama DK, Noall R, de Lorimier AA: Correction of congenital hydronephrosis in utero: II. Decompression reverses the effects of obstruction on the fetal lung and urinary tract. J Pediatr Surg 1982; 17: 965–74
13.
Manning FA, Harrison MR, Rodeck C: Catheter shunts for fetal hydronephrosis and hydrocephalus: Report of the International Fetal Surgery Registry. N Engl J Med 1986; 315: 336–40
14.
Olutoye OO, Adzick NS: Fetal surgery for myelomeningocele. Semin Perinatol 1999; 23: 462–73
15.
Mrzljak L, Uylings HB, Kostovic I, Van Eden CG: Prenatal development of neurons in the human prefrontal cortex: I. A qualitative Golgi study. J Comp Neurol 1988; 271: 355–86
16.
Hamamoto K, Iwamoto HS, Roman CM, Benet LZ, Rudolph AM: Fetal uptake of intraamniotic digoxin in sheep. Pediatr Res 1990; 27: 282–5
17.
Gilbert WM, Cheung CY, Brace RA: Rapid intramembranous absorption into the fetal circulation of arginine vasopressin injected intraamniotically. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991; 164: 1013–8, discussion 1018–20
18.
Carson GD, Bolla JD, Challis JR: The availability of cortisol in amniotic fluid to the fetus and chorionic and amniotic membranes. Endocrinology 1979; 104: 1053–8
19.
Veszelovszky I, Nagy ZB, Bodis L: Effects of intraamniotically administered thyroxin on acceleration of fetal pulmonary maturity in preeclamptic toxemia. J Perinat Med 1986; 14: 227–33
20.
Loftus JR, Hill H, Cohen SE: Placental transfer and neonatal effects of epidural sufentanil and fentanyl administered with bupivacaine during labor. A nesthesiology 1995; 83: 300–8
21.
Vertommen JD, Marcus MA, Van Aken H: The effects of intravenous and epidural sufentanil in the chronic maternal-fetal sheep preparation. Anesth Analg 1995; 80: 71–5
22.
Epstein B, Wurm S: Opioids for monitored anaesthesia care, Opioids in Anesthesia II. Edited by Estafanus F. Boston, Butterworth-Heinemann, 1991, pp 179–207
23.
Giannakoulopoulos X, Sepulveda W, Kourtis P, Glover V, Fisk NM: Fetal plasma cortisol and beta-endorphin response to intrauterine needling. Lancet 1994; 344: 77–81
24.
Glover V, Fisk NM: Fetal pain: Implications for research and practice. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999; 106: 881–6
25.
Giannakoulopoulos X, Teixeira J, Fisk N, Glover V: Human fetal and maternal noradrenaline responses to invasive procedures. Pediatr Res 1999; 45: 494–9
26.
Teixeira JM, Glover V, Fisk NM: Acute cerebral redistribution in response to invasive procedures in the human fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181: 1018–25
27.
Gitau R, Fisk NM, Teixeira JM, Cameron A, Glover V: Fetal hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal stress responses to invasive procedures are independent of maternal responses. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001; 86: 104–9
28.
Grunau RV, Whitfield MF, Petrie JH: Pain sensitivity and temperament in extremely low-birth-weight premature toddlers and preterm and full-term controls. Pain 1994; 58: 341–6
29.
Meaney MJ, Bhatnagar S, Diorio J, Larocque S, Francis D, O'Donnell D, Shanks N, Sharma S, Smythe J, Viau V: Molecular basis for the development of individual differences in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal stress response. Cell Mol Neurobiol 1993; 13: 321–47
30.
Clarke AS, Wittwer DJ, Abbott DH, Schneider ML: Long-term effects of prenatal stress on HPA axis activity in juvenile rhesus monkeys. Dev Psychobiol 1994; 27: 257–69
31.
Uno H, Lohmiller L, Thieme C, Kemnitz JW, Engle MJ, Roecker EB, Farrell PM: Brain damage induced by prenatal exposure to dexamethasone in fetal rhesus macaques: I. Hippocampus. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 1990; 53: 157–67
32.
Schneider ML: Prenatal stress exposure alters postnatal behavioral expression under conditions of novelty challenge in rhesus monkey infants. Dev Psychobiol 1992; 25: 529–40
33.
Taddio A, Goldbach M, Ipp M, Stevens B, Koren G: Effect of neonatal circumcision on pain responses during vaccination in boys. Lancet 1995; 345: 291–2
34.
Strümper D, Gogarten W, Marcus AE: Anaesthesia for fetal surgery. Baillière's Clinical Anaesthesiology 2000; 14: 759–69
35.
Szeto HH: Pharmacokinetics in the ovine maternal-fetal unit. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 1982; 22: 221–43
36.
Power S, Patrick JE, Challis JR: The disposition of [3H]cortisol after intra-amniotic administration to sheep late in pregnancy. J Dev Physiol 1980; 2: 357–63
37.
Morselli PL, Rovei V: Placental transfer of pethidine and norpethidine and their pharmacokinetics in the newborn. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1980; 18: 25–30
38.
Greeley WJ, de Bruijn NP, Davis DP: Sufentanil pharmacokinetics in pediatric cardiovascular patients. Anesth Analg 1987; 66: 1067–72
39.
Krauer B, Dayer P, Anner R: Changes in serum albumin and alpha 1-acid glycoprotein concentrations during pregnancy: An analysis of fetal-maternal pairs. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1984; 91: 875–81
40.
Meistelman C, Benhamou D, Barre J, Levron JC, Mahe V, Mazoit X, Ecoffey C: Effects of age on plasma protein binding of sufentanil. A nesthesiology 1990; 72: 470–3
41.
Dufresne C, Favetta P, Paradis C, Boulieu R: Stability of sufentanil in human plasma samples. Ther Drug Monit 2001; 23: 550–2
42.
Lehmann KA, Gerhard A, Horrichs-Haermeyer G, Grond S, Zech D: Postoperative patient-controlled analgesia with sufentanil: Analgesic efficacy and minimum effective concentrations. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1991; 35: 221–6