Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Meeting Abstracts|
October 2002
LUNG SEPARATION IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS: IS THE ARNDT ENDOBRONCHIAL BLOCKER® AN ALTERNATIVE TO A DOUBLE-LUMEN ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE?
Klaus Westphal, MD;
Klaus Westphal, MD
Departments of Anesthesiology, J.W. Goethe-University Hospital and *Katharina-Kasper-Kliniken, D-60590 Frankfurt, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Anesthesiology October 2002, Vol. 97, B27.
Citation
Volker Lischke, Stephan Mierdl, Klaus Westphal, Dirk Meininger, Christian Byhahn; LUNG SEPARATION IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS: IS THE ARNDT ENDOBRONCHIAL BLOCKER® AN ALTERNATIVE TO A DOUBLE-LUMEN ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE? . Anesthesiology 2002; 97:B27 doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200210113-00019
Download citation file:
33
Views
Citing articles via
Most Viewed
Related Articles
Devices for Lung Isolation Used by Anesthesiologists with Limited Thoracic Experience: Comparison of Double-lumen Endotracheal Tube, Univent® Torque Control Blocker, and Arndt Wire-guided Endobronchial Blocker®
Anesthesiology (February 2006)
Airway Injuries after One-lung Ventilation: A Comparison between Double-lumen Tube and Endobronchial Blocker: A Randomized, Prospective, Controlled Trial
Anesthesiology (September 2006)
Use of the Arndt Wire–guided Endobronchial Blocker
Anesthesiology (November 2002)
Back To Blockers?: The Continued Search for the Ideal Endobronchial Blocker
Anesthesiology (March 2013)