I am thankful for the opportunity to comment on the interesting letter from Dr. Pivalizza and Dr. Warters. They, too, have demonstrated that aprotinin affects the thromboelastograph trace even when kaolin is used as the activator. We did not mention their work in our article as our submission to Anesthesiology preceded their abstract. Unlike our results, they have not noted a difference in the R times and maximum amplitudes with celite and kaolin activation. This may relate to the concentrations of these activators. As the kaolin and celite concentrations are increased, there is a decrease in the R times and a slight increase in the maximum amplitudes of the thromboelastograph traces. We used 37 μl of 1% kaolin and 1% celite solutions per milliliter of blood. Perhaps the kaolin or celite concentration used by Dr. Pivalizza and Dr. Waters was different. This illustrates one of the potential problems with near patient tests, such as thromboelastography. It is difficult to assure quality control and to standardize results among centers.
Skip Nav Destination
Correspondence| September 2002
Anesthesiology September 2002, Vol. 97, 759.
- Views Icon Views
- PDF LinkPDF
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
Michael S. Avidan; Kaolin-activated Thromboelastography. Anesthesiology 2002; 97:759 doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200209000-00050
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Practice Guidelines for Moderate Procedural Sedation and Analgesia 2018: A Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Moderate Procedural Sedation and Analgesia, the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, American College of Radiology, American Dental Association, American Society of Dentist Anesthesiologists, and Society of Interventional Radiology