Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Meeting Abstracts|
September 2000
Room E, 10/16/2000 2: 00 PM - 4: 00 PM (PS) Cerebral Blood Flow Sensitivities to CO2 Determined by Read's Rebreathing Method and the Steady-State Method Are Not Equal : A-737
Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, Oxon, United Kingdom.
Anesthesiology September 2000, Vol. 93, A–737.
Citation
Jaideep J. Pandit, Ravi M. Mohan, Nicole D. Paterson, Marc J. Poulin; Room E, 10/16/2000 2: 00 PM - 4: 00 PM (PS) Cerebral Blood Flow Sensitivities to CO2 Determined by Read's Rebreathing Method and the Steady-State Method Are Not Equal : A-737. Anesthesiology 2000; 93:A–737 doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200009001-00737
Download citation file:
141
Views
Citing articles via
Most Viewed
Related Articles
A Model of the Ventilatory Depressant Potency of Remifentanil in the Non–steady State
Anesthesiology (October 2003)
Chest Wall Responses to Rebreathing in Halothane-anesthetized Dogs
Anesthesiology (October 1995)
Mixed-effects Modeling of the Intrinsic Ventilatory Depressant Potency of Propofol in the Non-steady State
Anesthesiology (February 2004)
Noninvasive Cardiac Output Measurement Using Partial Carbon Dioxide Rebreathing Is Less Accurate at Settings of Reduced Minute Ventilation and when Spontaneous Breathing Is Present
Anesthesiology (April 2003)
Effect of Ventilatory Settings on Accuracy of Cardiac Output Measurement Using Partial CO 2 Rebreathing
Anesthesiology (January 2002)