Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Meeting Abstracts|
September 2000
Room G, 10/16/2000 9: 00 AM - 11: 00 AM (PS) Comparison of Nasal Versus Oral Fiberoptic Laryngoscopy in Patients Breathing Spontaneously through a Cuffed Oropharyngeal Airway: A Pilot Study : A-1131
Anesthesiology, University of Texas Medical School, Houston, TX, United States.
Anesthesiology September 2000, Vol. 93, A–1131.
Citation
Peter Szmuk, Tiberiu Ezri, James Berry, Daniel Geva, Jeffrey Katz; Room G, 10/16/2000 9: 00 AM - 11: 00 AM (PS) Comparison of Nasal Versus Oral Fiberoptic Laryngoscopy in Patients Breathing Spontaneously through a Cuffed Oropharyngeal Airway: A Pilot Study : A-1131. Anesthesiology 2000; 93:A–1131 doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200009001-01131
Download citation file:
146
Views
Citing articles via
Most Viewed
Related Articles
Use of the Cuffed Oropharyngeal Airway as an Alternative to the Laryngeal Mask Airway with Positive-pressure Ventilation
Anesthesiology (May 1999)
Pharyngeal Mucosal Pressure and Perfusion : A Fiberoptic Evaluation of the Posterior Pharynx in Anesthetized Adult Patients with a Modified Cuffed Oropharyngeal Airway
Anesthesiology (December 1999)
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Cuffed Oropharyngeal Airway and the Laryngeal Mask Airway in Spontaneously Breathing Anesthetized Adults
Anesthesiology (April 1998)
The Cuffed Oropharyngeal Airway and Management of the Difficult Airway
Anesthesiology (March 1999)
Airway Management during Spaceflight: A Comparison of Four Airway Devices in Simulated Microgravity
Anesthesiology (May 2000)
