Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Meeting Abstracts|
September 2000
Room G, 10/16/2000 9: 00 AM - 11: 00 AM (PS) Comparison of Nasal Versus Oral Fiberoptic Laryngoscopy in Patients Breathing Spontaneously through a Cuffed Oropharyngeal Airway: A Pilot Study : A-1131
Anesthesiology, University of Texas Medical School, Houston, TX, United States.
Anesthesiology September 2000, Vol. 93, A–1131.
Citation
Peter Szmuk, Tiberiu Ezri, James Berry, Daniel Geva, Jeffrey Katz; Room G, 10/16/2000 9: 00 AM - 11: 00 AM (PS) Comparison of Nasal Versus Oral Fiberoptic Laryngoscopy in Patients Breathing Spontaneously through a Cuffed Oropharyngeal Airway: A Pilot Study : A-1131. Anesthesiology 2000; 93:A–1131 doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200009001-01131
Download citation file:
152
Views
Citing articles via
Most Viewed
Related Articles
Local Anesthetic Administration for Awake Direct Laryngoscopy: Are Glossopharyngeal Nerve Blocks Superior?
Anesthesiology (January 1997)
Skin Vasomotor Reflex as a Measure of Depth of Anesthesia
Anesthesiology (November 1998)
Intramuscular Rocuronium
Anesthesiology (February 1997)
Rigid Laryngoscope-assisted Insertion of Transesophageal Echocardiography Probe Reduces Oropharyngeal Mucosal Injury in Anesthetized Patients
Anesthesiology (January 2009)
Oropharyngeal Bacterial Colonization after Chlorhexidine Mouthwash in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients
Anesthesiology (December 2018)