Background

The effects of halothane and isoflurane on myocardial contraction and relaxation in diseased myocardium are not completely understood.

Methods

The effects of equianesthetic concentrations of halothane and isoflurane on inotropy and lusitropy in left ventricular papillary muscles of healthy hamsters and those with genetically induced cardiomyopathy (strain BIO 14.6) were investigated in vitro (29 degrees C; pH 7.40; Ca2+ 2.5 mM; stimulation frequency, 3/min) in isotonic and isometric conditions.

Results

Halothane induced a negative inotropic effect that was greater in cardiomyopathic than in healthy hamsters (1.5 vol%, active isometric force (AF): 19 +/- 8% vs. 28 +/- 11% of control values; P < 0.05). Isoflurane induced a negative inotropic effect that was greater in cardiomyopathic than in healthy hamsters (2.0 vol%, AF: 64 +/- 13% vs. 75 +/- 11% of control values; P < 0.01). However, the negative inotropic effects of halothane and isoflurane were not different for cardiomyopathic or healthy hamsters when their concentrations were corrected for minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) values in each strain. Halothane induced a negative lusitropic effect under low load, which was more important in cardiomyopathic hamsters, suggesting a greater impairment in calcium uptake by the sarcoplasmic reticulum. In contrast, isoflurane induced a moderate positive lusitropic effect under low load in healthy but not in cardiomyopathic hamsters. Halothane and isoflurane induced no significant lusitropic effect under high load.

Conclusions

Halothane and isoflurane had greater negative inotropic effects in cardiomyopathic than in healthy hamsters. Nevertheless, no significant differences in their inotropic effects were noted when concentrations were correlated as a multiple of MAC in each strain.

Halogenated anesthetic agents have myocardial depressant effects that are observed in vivo and in vitro. [1–4] Halothane is recognized as a more potent negative inotropic agent than other halogenated anesthetic agents, including isoflurane. [1–4] Nevertheless, most previous studies were conducted in normal myocardium. We recently showed that the effects of intravenous anesthetic agents can be different in diseased myocardium. [5,6] Previous in vivo studies have reported that the negative inotropic effects of halogenated anesthetics are more pronounced in ischemic myocardium [7,8] and during pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. [9] The negative inotropic effect of isoflurane in vitro is enhanced during congestive heart failure, [10] but this is not true for halothane. [11] In contrast, Hattori et al. [12] showed that the effects of halothane and isoflurane were less pronounced on cardiac muscles from diabetic rats than those observed in healthy rats. Murat et al. [13] reported that halothane produced a similar dose-dependent decrease in maximal calcium-activated tension in healthy and cardiomyopathic hamsters. Nevertheless, they studied skinned myocardial fibers in which sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) and sarcolemma were removed, and the effects of halogenated anesthetic agents on myofilament are believed to occur only at high supratherapeutic concentrations. [14,15]

The various strains of Syrian hamsters with hereditary cardiomyopathy offer an opportunity to investigate the effects of anesthetic agents on intrinsic myocardial contractility. [5,6,13] Contractility, cellular biochemistry, molecular biology, and pathophysiology have been studied extensively in this model, the time course of heart failure is well known, and impairment in contractility is due primarily to cardiac muscle cell disease, and thus may be more relevant to clinical cardiomyopathies. [16] Therefore, we conducted an in vitro study of the effects of halothane and isoflurane on the contractility of left ventricular papillary muscles from healthy hamsters and those with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. The experimental model that we used allowed us to assess the effects of halothane and isoflurane on both contraction (inotropy) and relaxation (lusitropy).

Thirteen healthy Syrian hamsters (strain FIB) and 12 cardiomyopathic Syrian hamsters (strain BIO 14.6) were used (Bio Breeders, Fitchburg, MA). In the cardiomyopathic strain, all animals of both sexes develop hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from the age of 6 weeks. Care of the animals conformed to the recommendations of the Helsinki Declaration, and the study was performed in accordance with the regulations of the official edict of the French Ministry of Agriculture. All healthy and cardiomyopathic hamsters were 6 months old. Body weight, heart weight, and left ventricular weight were determined at the moment of killing. Heart weight-to-body weight and left ventricular weight-to-body weight ratios were calculated. The degree of cardiac hypertrophy was determined by dividing the heart weight-to-body weight value of each cardiomyopathic hamster by the mean heart weight-to-body weight value in healthy hamsters, as previously reported. [5,6]

Experimental Protocol 

Forty left ventricular papillary muscles (one or two from each hamster) were studied. After brief anesthesia with ether, the hearts were quickly removed, and left ventricular papillary muscles were carefully excised and suspended vertically in a 200-ml jacketed reservoir with Krebs-Henseleit bicarbonate buffer solution containing 118 mM NaCl, 4.7 mM KCl, 1.2 mM MgSO4, 1.1 mM KH2PO4, 25 mM NaHCO3, 2.5 mM CaCl2, and 4.5 mM glucose. The Krebs-Henseleit solution was prepared daily with highly purified water (Ecopure, Barnstead/Thermolyne Corp., Dubuque, IA). The jacketed reservoir was maintained at 29 degrees C with a thermostatic water circulator (Polystat 5HP; Bioblock, Illkirch, France) with continuous monitoring of the solution temperature. Muscles were field stimulated at 3 pulses/min by two platinum electrodes with rectangular wave pulses lasting 5 ms just above threshold. The bathing solution was bubbled with 95% oxygen and 5% carbon dioxide, resulting in a pH of 7.40. After a 90-min stabilization period at the initial muscle length at the apex of the length-active isometric tension curve (Lmax), papillary muscles recovered their optimal mechanical performance, which remained stable for many hours.

The control values of each mechanical parameter were recorded at an extracellular calcium concentration ([Ca sup ++]o) of 2.5 mM. A preliminary study (data not shown) showed that hamster myocardial contractility is nearly maximum at a [Ca sup ++]oof 3.5 mM and that a [Ca sup ++]oof 2.5 mM corresponds to the upper point of the linear part of the [Ca sup ++]o-active isometric force relation, where active isometric force is 75% of its maximal value. This [Ca sup ++]oenabled us to study the negative inotropic effects of volatile anesthetics over a range of concentrations. Equianesthetic concentrations were studied in a cumulative manner in separate groups of papillary muscles for halothane (n = 20) and isoflurane (n = 20).

Administration of Halogenated Anesthetics 

Halothane (Fluotec 3; Cyprane Ltd, Keighley, UK) and isoflurane (Fortec 3, Cyprane Ltd) were added to the carbon dioxide-oxygen mixture with calibrated vaporizers. The gas mixture bubbled continuously in the bathing solution. To minimize evaporation of anesthetic vapors, the jacketed reservoir was covered with a paraffin sheet. Anesthetic concentrations in the gas phase were monitored continuously using an infrared analyzer (Artema MM 206SD; Taema, Antony, France). Minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) values of halothane and isoflurane were determined previously for rodents at 37 [degree sign] Celsius, 1.1% and 1.4%, respectively. [17] In the present study, halothane concentrations used were 0.3, 0.6, 0.9, 1.2, and 1.5 vol%, and those of isoflurane were 0.4, 0.8, 1.2, 1.6, and 2 vol%. These concentrations are equivalent to 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, and 2.5 MAC, respectively, in healthy adult rodents at 29 [degree sign] Celsius. [18] However, we have shown that MAC values of halothane and isoflurane are lower in cardiomyopathic than in healthy hamsters. [19] Therefore two points of view were chosen in the present study:(1) a pharmacologic perspective in which comparison of halogenated anesthetics was performed at the same concentrations (expressed as vol%) between normal and cardiomyopathic hamsters;(2) a clinical perspective in which comparison of halogenated anesthetics was performed at equipotent concentrations (expressed as MAC) between normal and cardiomyopathic hamsters. Because MAC values have been determined by measuring expired concentrations, [19] corrections of 11% for halothane and 4% for isoflurane were applied to estimate real MAC values, as previously reported. [17] Thus we used the following values for MAC at 29 [degree sign] Celsius: halothane 0.54% in healthy and 0.42% in cardiomyopathic hamsters; isoflurane 0.90% in healthy and 0.77% in cardiomyopathic hamsters. A 20-min period of equilibration was allowed between each anesthetic concentration and mechanical parameter recordings.

Anesthetic Concentrations in the Krebs-Henseleit Solution 

Halothane and isoflurane concentrations in the Krebs-Henseleit bicarbonate buffer solution were measured by gas-liquid chromatography. The coefficient of variation in the measurement was 5.5% and the limit of quantification was 0.02 mM. Table 1reports anesthetic concentrations measured in the Krebs-Henseleit solution after 20 min of continuous bubbling.

Table 1. Correspondence between Halothane and Isoflurane Concentrations in the Gas Phase (in vol %) and in the Krebs-Henseleit Solution (in mM) 

Table 1. Correspondence between Halothane and Isoflurane Concentrations in the Gas Phase (in vol %) and in the Krebs-Henseleit Solution (in mM) 
Table 1. Correspondence between Halothane and Isoflurane Concentrations in the Gas Phase (in vol %) and in the Krebs-Henseleit Solution (in mM) 

Electromagnetic Lever System and Recording 

The electromagnetic lever system has been described previously. [20] Briefly, the load applied to the muscle was determined using a servomechanism-controlled current through the coil of an electromagnet. Muscular shortening displaced the lever, which modulated the light intensity of a photoelectric transducer. All analyses were made from digital records of force and length obtained with a computer, as previously described. [21]

Mechanical Parameters 

Conventional mechanical parameters at Lmaxwere calculated from three twitches. The first twitch was isotonic and loaded with the preload corresponding to Lmax. The second twitch was abruptly clamped to zero-load just after the electrical stimulus; the muscle was released from preload to zero-load with critical damping to slow the first and rapid shortening overshoot resulting from the recoil of series passive elastic components, as previously reported [22]; the maximum unloaded shortening velocity (Vmax) was determined from this twitch. The third twitch was fully isometric at Lmax.

The mechanical parameters characterizing the contraction and relaxation phases and the coupling between contraction and relaxation are defined as follows (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Mechanical parameters of contraction and relaxation. (Upper) Muscle shortening length (L/Lmax) plotted versus time. (Lower) Force (F) plotted versus time. Twitch 1 was loaded with preload only at Lmax. Twitch 2 was loaded with the same preload as twitch 1 but was abruptly clamped to zero-load with critical damping just after electric stimulus; maximum unloaded shortening velocity (Vmax) was determined from this twitch. Twitch 3 was fully isometric. Coefficient R1, the ratio of maximum shortening velocity (sub max Vc) to maximum lengthening velocity (sub max Vr), tests lusitropy under low load; coefficient R2, the ratio of the peak of the positive force derivative (+ dF/dt) to the peak of the negative force derivative (-dF/dt), tests lusitropy under high load.

Figure 1. Mechanical parameters of contraction and relaxation. (Upper) Muscle shortening length (L/Lmax) plotted versus time. (Lower) Force (F) plotted versus time. Twitch 1 was loaded with preload only at Lmax. Twitch 2 was loaded with the same preload as twitch 1 but was abruptly clamped to zero-load with critical damping just after electric stimulus; maximum unloaded shortening velocity (Vmax) was determined from this twitch. Twitch 3 was fully isometric. Coefficient R1, the ratio of maximum shortening velocity (sub max Vc) to maximum lengthening velocity (sub max Vr), tests lusitropy under low load; coefficient R2, the ratio of the peak of the positive force derivative (+ dF/dt) to the peak of the negative force derivative (-dF/dt), tests lusitropy under high load.

Close modal

Contraction Phase. We determined Vmaxusing the zero-load clamp technique and maximum shortening velocity (sub max Vc) of the twitch with preload only, maximum isometric active force normalized per cross-sectional area (AF), and peak of the positive force derivative normalized for the cross-sectional area (+ dF/dt). The Vmaxand AF tested the inotropic state under low (isotony) and high (isometry) loads, respectively.

Relaxation Phase. We determined maximum lengthening velocity of the twitch with preload only (sub max Vr), and peak of the negative force derivative at Lmaxnormalized per cross-sectional area (-dF/dt). These two parameters studied relaxation under low- and high-loading conditions, respectively. Nevertheless, because changes in the contraction phase induce coordinated changes in the relaxation phase,maxVr and -dF/dt cannot assess lusitropy, and thus variations in contraction and relaxation must be considered simultaneously to quantify drug-induced changes in myocardial lusitropy. Indexes of contraction-relaxation coupling thus have been developed to study lusitropy. [23]

Contraction-Relaxation Coupling. Coefficient R1 =maxVc/sub max Vr studied the coupling between contraction and relaxation under low load, and thus lusitropy, in a manner that is independent of inotropic changes. Under isotonic conditions, the amplitude of sarcomere shortening is markedly greater than that observed under isometric conditions. [24] Because of the lower sensitivity of myofilament for calcium when cardiac muscle is markedly shortened under low load, relaxation proceeds more rapidly than contraction, apparently because of the rapid uptake of calcium by the SR. Thus, in hamster myocardium, R1 tests SR calcium uptake function. Coefficient R2 =(+dF/dt)/(-dF/dt) studied the coupling between contraction and relaxation under high load, and thus lusitropy, in a manner that is less dependent on inotropic changes. When the muscle contracts isometrically, sarcomeres shorten very little. [24] Because of a higher sensitivity of myofilament for calcium, [25] the relaxation time course is determined by calcium unbinding from troponin C rather than by calcium sequestration by the SR. Thus R2 reflects myofilament calcium sensitivity. [22,26] The contraction-relaxation coupling parameters R1 and R2 have been validated as indexes of myocardial lusitropy in a mathematical model. [27]

At the end of the study, the muscle cross-sectional area was calculated from the length and weight of papillary muscle, assuming a density of 1. Shortening and lengthening velocities were expressed in L sub max /s, force in mN/mm2, and force derivative in mN [center dot] mm sup -2 [center dot] s sup -1.

Statistical Analysis 

Data are expressed as means +/- SD. Comparison of two means was performed using the Student's t test. Comparison of several means was performed using repeated-measures analysis of variance and the Newman-Keuls test (concentrations of anesthetic agents expressed as vol%) or multivariate analysis of variance (concentrations of anesthetic agents expressed as multiples of MAC). All probability values were two tailed, and a value less than 0.05 was required to reject the null hypothesis. Statistical analysis was performed on a computer using NCSS 6.0 software (Statistical Solutions, Ltd, Cork, Ireland).

Body weight was significantly lower in cardiomyopathic hamsters than in controls (Table 2). Heart weight and left ventricular weight were not significantly different between healthy hamsters and those with cardiomyopathy. Consequently, the heart weight-to-body weight ratio was significantly greater in cardiomyopathic hamsters, indicating cardiac hypertrophy (Table 2). [5,6]

Table 2. Characteristics of Normal Hamsters and Those with Cardiomyopathy 

Table 2. Characteristics of Normal Hamsters and Those with Cardiomyopathy 
Table 2. Characteristics of Normal Hamsters and Those with Cardiomyopathy 

The intrinsic mechanical performance of papillary muscles from hamsters with cardiomyopathy was significantly lower in isometric (AF, +dF/dt) and isotonic (Vmax,maxVc) conditions. R1, which tests the contraction-relaxation coupling under low load and thus SR function, was slightly but significantly greater in cardiomyopathic hamsters than in controls. In contrast, R2, which tests the contraction-relaxation coupling under high load, and thus the myofilament calcium sensitivity, was not significantly different between normal hamsters and those with cardiomyopathy (Table 3).

Table 3. Mechanical Parameters of Papillary Muscles in Normal Hamsters and Those with Cardiomyopathy 

Table 3. Mechanical Parameters of Papillary Muscles in Normal Hamsters and Those with Cardiomyopathy 
Table 3. Mechanical Parameters of Papillary Muscles in Normal Hamsters and Those with Cardiomyopathy 

Effects of Halothane 

In healthy hamsters, halothane induced a marked dose-dependent negative inotropic effect, as shown by the decrease in Vmax(Figure 2) and AF (Figure 3). Vmaxand AF observed at 1.5 vol% in healthy hamsters were 51 +/- 12% and 28 +/- 11% of control values, respectively. The negative inotropic effect was significantly greater in cardiomyopathic hamsters in isotonic (Figure 2) and isometric (Figure 3) conditions. Because contractile properties vary from one papillary muscle to another in cardiomyopathic hamsters, [6] papillary muscles were divided into two groups: those with severe myocardial failure (i.e., baseline AF <or= to 15 mN/mm2; n = 4, AF = 12 +/- 2 mN/mm2) and those with moderate myocardial failure (i.e., baseline AF > 15 mN/mm2; n = 6; AF = 31 +/- 13 mN/mm2). At the highest concentration of halothane (1.5 vol%), there was no significant difference in the negative inotropic effect of halothane between papillary muscles with severe myocardial failure and those with moderate myocardial failure (Figure 4).

Figure 2. Comparison of the effects of halothane and isoflurane on maximum unloaded shortening velocity (Vmax) in papillary muscles from healthy hamsters and those with cardiomyopathy. Halothane and isoflurane concentrations are reported in vol%. Data are mean +/- SD. Probability values refer to between-group differences. NS = not significant. *P < 0.05 versus control values.

Figure 2. Comparison of the effects of halothane and isoflurane on maximum unloaded shortening velocity (Vmax) in papillary muscles from healthy hamsters and those with cardiomyopathy. Halothane and isoflurane concentrations are reported in vol%. Data are mean +/- SD. Probability values refer to between-group differences. NS = not significant. *P < 0.05 versus control values.

Close modal

Figure 3. Comparison of the effects of halothane and isoflurane on isometric active force (AF) normalized per cross-sectional area of papillary muscles from healthy hamsters and those with cardiomyopathy. Halothane and isoflurane concentrations are reported in vol%. Data are mean +/- SD. Probability values refer to between-group differences. *P <0.05 versus control values.

Figure 3. Comparison of the effects of halothane and isoflurane on isometric active force (AF) normalized per cross-sectional area of papillary muscles from healthy hamsters and those with cardiomyopathy. Halothane and isoflurane concentrations are reported in vol%. Data are mean +/- SD. Probability values refer to between-group differences. *P <0.05 versus control values.

Close modal

Figure 4. Comparison of the negative inotropic effects (assessed by percentage change in isometric active force [AF]) of halothane (1.5 vol%) and isoflurane (2 vol%), corresponding to 2.5 MAC in healthy rodents, in healthy papillary muscles and cardiomyopathic papillary muscles with a moderate (AF > 15 mN/mm2) or severe (AF <or= to 15 mN/mm2) decrease in contractility. Data are mean +/- SD. NS = not significant. *P < 0.05.

Figure 4. Comparison of the negative inotropic effects (assessed by percentage change in isometric active force [AF]) of halothane (1.5 vol%) and isoflurane (2 vol%), corresponding to 2.5 MAC in healthy rodents, in healthy papillary muscles and cardiomyopathic papillary muscles with a moderate (AF > 15 mN/mm2) or severe (AF <or= to 15 mN/mm2) decrease in contractility. Data are mean +/- SD. NS = not significant. *P < 0.05.

Close modal

Under isotonic conditions, halothane induced a significant negative lusitropic effect (increase in R1) in healthy and cardiomyopathic hamsters (Figure 5). This impairment became significant at 1.5 vol% in healthy hamsters and at 1.2 vol% in cardiomyopathic hamsters and was significantly more important in cardiomyopathic hamsters than in healthy hamsters (Figure 5). Under isometric conditions, halothane induced no significant lusitropic effect, either in healthy or in cardiomyopathic hamsters (Figure 6).

Figure 5. Comparison of the lusitropic effects under low load (R1 =maxVc/sub max Vr) of halothane and isoflurane in papillary muscles from healthy hamsters and those with cardiomyopathy. Halothane and isoflurane concentrations are reported in vol%. Data are mean +/- SD. Probability values refer to between-groups difference. P < 0.05 versus control values.

Figure 5. Comparison of the lusitropic effects under low load (R1 =maxVc/sub max Vr) of halothane and isoflurane in papillary muscles from healthy hamsters and those with cardiomyopathy. Halothane and isoflurane concentrations are reported in vol%. Data are mean +/- SD. Probability values refer to between-groups difference. P < 0.05 versus control values.

Close modal

Figure 6. Comparison of the lusitropic effects under high load (R2 =[+dF/dt]/[-dF/dt]) of halothane and isoflurane in papillary muscles from healthy hamsters and those with cardiomyopathy. Halothane and isoflurane concentrations are reported in vol%. Data are mean +/- SD. Probability values refer to between-groups difference. NS = not significant. No significant differences versus control values.

Figure 6. Comparison of the lusitropic effects under high load (R2 =[+dF/dt]/[-dF/dt]) of halothane and isoflurane in papillary muscles from healthy hamsters and those with cardiomyopathy. Halothane and isoflurane concentrations are reported in vol%. Data are mean +/- SD. Probability values refer to between-groups difference. NS = not significant. No significant differences versus control values.

Close modal

Effects of Isoflurane 

In healthy hamsters, isoflurane induced a moderate significant negative inotropic effect, as shown by the decreases in Vmax(Figure 2) and AF (Figure 3). Vmaxand AF observed at 2 vol% in healthy hamsters were 87 +/- 9%, and 75 +/- 9% of control values, respectively. The decrease in AF was significantly greater in cardiomyopathic hamsters (Figure 3), but not that of Vmax(Figure 2). As stated previously, papillary muscles were divided into two groups: those with a severe myocardial failure (n = 5; AF = 12 +/- 3 mN/mm2) and those with moderate myocardial failure (n = 5; AF = 26 +/- 17 mN/mm2). At the highest concentration of isoflurane (2 vol%), there was no significant difference in the negative inotropic effect of isoflurane between papillary muscles with severe myocardial failure and those with moderate myocardial failure (Figure 4).

Under isotonic conditions, isoflurane induced no significant lusitropic effect, except at the highest concentration (2 vol%) in healthy hamsters (Figure 5). Nevertheless, a global and significant difference in R1 was noted between normal and cardiomyopathic hamsters (Figure 5). Under isometric conditions, isoflurane induced no significant lusitropic effect, either in healthy or in cardiomyopathic hamsters (Figure 6).

Expression of Anesthetic Concentration as a Multiple of Minimum Alveolar Concentration in Each Strain 

Because we showed that MAC of halothane and isoflurane were 23% and 14% lower, respectively, in cardiomyopathic hamsters, [19] we also plotted Vmaxand AF as functions of MAC values determined in each strain (Figure 7). Accordingly, the negative inotropic effects of halothane and isoflurane were not significantly different between healthy hamsters and those with cardiomyopathy.

Figure 7. Comparison of the effects of halothane and isoflurane on isometric active force (AF) normalized per cross-sectional area of papillary muscles from healthy hamsters and those with cardiomyopathy. Halothane and isoflurane concentrations are reported as minimum alveolar concentration multiples in each strain. Data are mean +/- SD. Probability values refer to between-group difference (multivariate analysis of variance). NS = not significant. *P < 0.05 versus control values.

Figure 7. Comparison of the effects of halothane and isoflurane on isometric active force (AF) normalized per cross-sectional area of papillary muscles from healthy hamsters and those with cardiomyopathy. Halothane and isoflurane concentrations are reported as minimum alveolar concentration multiples in each strain. Data are mean +/- SD. Probability values refer to between-group difference (multivariate analysis of variance). NS = not significant. *P < 0.05 versus control values.

Close modal

Our main finding was that halothane and isoflurane had greater negative inotropic effects in cardiomyopathic hamsters than in healthy hamsters. Nevertheless, no significant differences in the inotropic effects of halothane and isoflurane were noted when concentrations were corrected as MAC multiples for each strain. Furthermore, halothane induced a significant negative lusitropic effect under low load, which was greater in cardiomyopathic hamsters than in healthy ones.

The cardiovascular effects of halothane and isoflurane have been studied extensively in animals and humans in vivo and in vitro. [1–4,28] Because of concomitant changes in preload, systemic resistance, heart rate, sympathetic activity, and central nervous system activity, the precise effects of halogenated anesthetics on intrinsic myocardial contractility are difficult to assess in vivo. Volatile anesthetics induce myocardial depression via profound alterations in the main cellular components involved in intracellular calcium homeostasis:(1) a depression of the inward Ca sup ++ current (ICa) through the sarcolemma, via inhibition of both L-type Ca sup ++ channels and Na sup +/Ca sup ++ exchanger [29,30];(2) a decrease in SR function, [31] which has been shown to occur to a lesser extent with isoflurane than with halothane; furthermore, halothane, but not isoflurane, increases the Ca sup ++ permeability of SR membrane, which contributes to depleting the SR of Ca sup ++ stores [32]; this effect may be related to the fact that halothane, but not isoflurane, gates the cardiac SR Ca sup ++ release channel into the open state [33]; and (3) a decrease in the calcium myofilament sensitivity, [34] which is thought to occur only at high supratherapeutic concentrations. [14,15] In healthy hamsters, halothane and isoflurane induced a negative inotropic effect (Figure 2and Figure 3), which was much more pronounced for halothane than for isoflurane, as previously reported. [1–3,14,28] Our results correspond with those previously noted by Lynch [2] in rat myocardium and by Housmans et al. [3,35] in the ferret myocardium when the MAC of halothane and isoflurane were corrected for the temperature of the experiment.

Genetically induced cardiomyopathy in Syrian hamsters is characterized by the progressive occurrence of focal myocardial degeneration, fibrosis, and calcifications during the life of the animal. [16] At age 30–40 days, histologic lesions become apparent and myocardial performance decreases. Further cardiac changes include hypertrophy, dilation, or both, depending on the strain, and then congestive heart failure and death. In our study, myocardial contractility was markedly impaired in cardiomyopathic left ventricular papillary muscles (Table 2). The decreased myocardial contractility in cardiomyopathic hamsters may be explained by the decreased activities of G proteins, [36] sarcolemmal Ca sup ++, and Na sup +-K sup + ATPase, [37] alterations in Na sup +/Ca sup ++ exchange, [38] decreased conductance and density of voltage-sensitive calcium channels, [38] and alteration in myofilament regulatory proteins. [39] Nevertheless, a decrease in SR function is not observed in all hamster strains, and the strain used in the present study (BIO 14.6), which develops hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, has been shown to exhibit normal SR function. [40] In the present study, we observed a moderate but significant increase in R1 in cardiomyopathic hamsters. This result suggests that SR function is moderately impaired in hamsters with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, whereas it is severely impaired in hamsters with dilated cardiomyopathy. [40]

In cardiomyopathic hamsters, we observed that the negative inotropic effect of halothane was more pronounced than in healthy hamsters (Figure 2and Figure 3). This result is contrary to that reported in vitro by Kemmotsu et al. [10] on isolated cat papillary muscle in an experimental model of hypertrophic heart failure. We also noted that the negative inotropic effect of isoflurane was greater in cardiomyopathic hamsters (Figure 3). These results concord with those reported by Shimosato et al. [11] on isolated cat papillary muscle in an experimental model of congestive heart failure. On the other hand, Hattori et al. [12] reported that myocardium from diabetic rats is less sensitive to the negative inotropic effects of halothane and isoflurane than the myocardium of healthy rats; however, in that study, the slope of the regression curve between contraction parameters and anesthetic concentration was similar in control and in diabetic muscles.

It can be argued that the differences observed in the negative inotropic effects of halothane and isoflurane between healthy and cardiomyopathic hamsters could have been greater in older animals with more severe cardiac disease. However, mortality rates dramatically increase in older animals, and there are important differences in contractility in different papillary muscles from the same animal because myocardial lesions are not homogeneously distributed. Consequently, rather than studying older animals, we compared the effects of anesthetic agents in papillary muscles with moderate and severe decreases in contractility, as previously described. [6] However, the negative inotropic effects of halothane and isoflurane were not significantly different between these two groups of papillary muscles (Figure 4).

We have shown that the MAC of halothane and isoflurane are decreased in cardiomyopathic hamsters. [19] The expression of Vmaxand AF as functions of MAC in each strain showed that the negative inotropic effects of halothane and isoflurane were not significantly different between healthy and cardiomyopathic hamsters (Figure 7). This important point (i.e., the increase in anesthetic potency in cardiomyopathy) has been overlooked in previous experimental and clinical studies. However, because little information is available about anesthetic potency in cardiovascular diseases, we believe it was important to report our results both from a pharmacologic (Figure 3) and a clinically relevant perspective (Figure 7).

In both healthy and cardiomyopathic hamsters, halothane induced a negative lusitropic effect under low load (an increase in R1), suggesting a decrease in SR calcium uptake. This result is consistent with previous studies using various species and different methodologic approaches. [3,31,35] This negative lusitropic effect under low load was significantly more important in cardiomyopathic hamsters than in healthy hamsters (Figure 5). These results suggest that the effects of halothane on the SR function were potentiated in cardiomyopathic hamsters. In healthy hamsters, isoflurane induced no significant lusitropic effect under low load, except at a very high (2 vol%) concentration. This result is consistent with the known weak interference of isoflurane with the SR. [3,31,33] The decrease in R1 observed with 2 vol% of isoflurane is consistent with the results of previous studies, indicating that isoflurane can shorten isotonic relaxation, whereas halothane lengthen it. [35] The explanation for this positive lusitropic effect of isoflurane under low load is not fully understood. It should be noted that, depending on experimental conditions, isoflurane has been reported to either increase or decrease Ca sup ++ uptake by the SR. [41,42] In cardiomyopathic hamsters, R1 remained unchanged regardless of the concentration of isoflurane, and was significantly greater than in healthy hamsters (Figure 5). Thus despite a weak effect of isoflurane on SR function, and probably because of an already slightly impaired SR function in cardiomyopathic hamsters, a significant difference in the effects of isoflurane on R1 was noted between healthy and cardiomyopathic hamsters. Nevertheless, this difference was very moderate (Figure 5).

Coefficient R2 tests the lusitropic state under high load and thus reflects myofilament calcium sensitivity. [22,26] Our results showed that halothane and isoflurane did not significantly modify R2 (Figure 6), either in healthy or in cardiomyopathic hamsters, suggesting that they did not interfere with myofilament calcium sensitivity. Using skinned rat ventricular trabeculae, Murat et al. [34] reported that halothane and isoflurane decreased calcium myofilament sensitivity, but the importance of this phenomenon in intact muscular preparation is debated. [14,15] Furthermore, species differences may also explain observed discrepancies because halothane and isoflurane induced an abbreviation of isometric relaxation in the ferret myocardium [3,35] but not in the hamster and rat myocardium. [43]

The following points must be considered in the assessment of the clinical relevance of our results. First, because this study was conducted in vitro, it dealt only with intrinsic myocardial contractility. This point should be of special importance in patients with cardiomyopathy whose cardiac function does not depend only on intrinsic contractility but also on preload, afterload, and sympathetic activity. Second, this study was conducted at 29 [degree sign] Celsius at a low-stimulation frequency; yet papillary muscles must be studied at this temperature because stability of mechanical parameters is not sufficient at 37 [degree sign] Celsius, and at a low frequency because high-stimulation frequency induces core hypoxia. [44] Furthermore, higher stimulation rates frequently induce extrasystoles in cardiomyopathic muscles, resulting in an unreliable recording of mechanical parameters. Third, hamster myocardium differs somewhat in its cardiac behavior from other species, including humans. Nevertheless, the effects of volatile anesthetics on the myocardium appear to be very similar from one species to another, at least if we consider mammalian species. Fourth, the results obtained in this experimental model of genetically induced cardiomyopathy cannot be generalized to all types of cardiac failure. Nevertheless, hamsters with cardiomyopathy may be considered a suitable model of human cardiomyopathy with progressive heart failure for a prolonged period, as is observed either in dilated or hypertrophic cardiomyopathies.

In conclusion, halothane and isoflurane induce greater negative inotropic effects in cardiomyopathic than in healthy hamsters. Nevertheless, because MAC values are decreased in cardiomyopathy, no significant differences in the inotropic effects of halothane and isoflurane were noted, providing that concentrations are corrected as a multiple of MAC in each strain. Furthermore, halothane, but not isoflurane, induced a negative lusitropic effect under low load that was more pronounced in cardiomyopathic hamsters.

1.
Merin RG: Are the myocardial functional and metabolic effects of isoflurane really different from those of halothane and enflurane? Anesthesiology 1981; 55:398-408.
2.
Lynch C III: Differential depression of myocardial contractility by halothane and isoflurane in vitro. Anesthesiology 1986; 64:620-31.
3.
Housmans PR, Murat I: Comparative effects of halothane, enflurane, and isoflurane at equipotent anesthetic concentrations on isolated ventricular myocardium of the ferret. I. Contractility. Anesthesiology 1988; 69:451-63.
4.
Pagel PS, Kampine JP, Schmeling WT, Warltier DC: Comparison of the systemic and coronary hemodynamic actions of desflurane, isoflurane, halothane, and enflurane in the chronically instrumented dog. Anesthesiology 1991; 74:539-51.
5.
Riou B, Viars P, Lecarpentier Y: Effects of ketamine on the cardiac papillary muscle of normal hamsters and those with cardiomyopathy. Anesthesiology 1990; 73:910-8.
6.
Riou B, Lejay M, Lecarpentier Y, Viars P: Myocardial effects of propofol in hamsters with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Anesthesiology 1995; 82:566-73.
7.
Lowenstein E, Foex P, Francis CM, Davies WL, Yusuf S, Ryder WA: Regional ischemic ventricular dysfunction in myocardium supplied by a narrowed coronary artery with increasing halothane concentration in the dog. Anesthesiology 1981; 55:349-59.
8.
Kissin I, Thomson CT, Smith LR: Effects of halothane on contractile function of ischemic myocardium. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1983; 5:438-42.
9.
Pagel PS, Lowe D, Hettrick DA, Jamali IN, Kersten JR, Tessmer JP, Warltier DC: Isoflurane, but not halothane, improves indices of diastolic performance in dogs with rapid ventricular, pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. Anesthesiology 1996; 85:644-54.
10.
Kemmotsu O, Hashimoto Y, Shimosato S: Inotropic effects of isoflurane on mechanics of contraction in isolated cat papillary muscles from normal and failing hearts. Anesthesiology 1973; 39:470-7.
11.
Shimosato S, Yasuda I, Kemmotsu O, Shanks C, Gamble C: Effect of halothane on altered contractility of isolated heart muscle obtained from cats with experimentally produced ventricular hypertrophy and failure. Br J Anaesth 1973; 45:2-9.
12.
Hattori Y, Azuma M, Gotoh Y, Kanno M: Negative inotropic effects of halothane, enflurane, and isoflurance in papillary muscles from diabetic rats. Anesth Analg 1987; 66:23-8.
13.
Murat I, Veksler VI, Ventura-Clapier R: Effects of halothane on contractile properties of skinned fibers from cardiomyopathic animals. J Mol Cell Cardiol 1989; 21:1293-304.
14.
Bosnjak ZJ, Aggarwal A, Turner LA, Kampine JM, Kampine JP: Differential effects of halothane, enflurane, and isoflurane on Ca sup 2+ transients and papillary muscle tension in guinea pigs. Anesthesiology 1992; 76:123-31.
15.
Tavernier BM, Adnet PJ, Imbenotte M, Etchrivi TS, Reyford H, Haudecoeur G, Scherpereel P, Krivosic-Horber RM: Halothane and isoflurane decrease calcium sensitivity and maximal force in human skinned cardiac fibers. Anesthesiology 1994; 80:625-33.
16.
Strobeck JE, Factor SM, Bhan A, Sole M, Liew CC, Fein F, Sonnenblick EH: Hereditary and acquired cardiomyopathies in experimental animals: Mechanical, biochemical, and structural features. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1979; 317:59-88.
17.
White PF, Johnston RR, Eger EI: Determination of anesthetic requirement in rats. Anesthesiology 1974; 40:52-7.
18.
Vitez TS, White PF, Eger EI: Effects of hypothermia on halothane MAC and isoflurane MAC in the rat. Anesthesiology 1974; 41:80-1.
19.
Vivien B, Coriat P, Riou B: Minimum alveolar concentrations of halothane and isoflurane in normal and cardiomyopathic hamsters [Abstract]. Br J Anaesth 1997; 78(Suppl 1):43.
20.
Lecarpentier Y, Martin JL, Gastineau P, Hatt PY: Load dependence of mammalian heart relaxation during cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure. Am J Physiol 1982; 242:H855-61.
21.
Riou B, Lecarpentier Y, Viars P: Inotropic effect of ketamine on rat cardiac papillary muscle. Anesthesiology 1989; 71:116-25.
22.
Brutsaert DL, Claes VA: Onset of mechanical activation of mamalian heart muscle in calcium- and strontium-containing solutions. Circ Res 1974; 35:345-57.
23.
Chemla D, Lecarpentier Y, Martin JL, Clergue M, Antonetti A, Hatt PY: Relationship between inotropy and relaxation in rat myocardium. Am J Physiol 1986; 250:H1008-16.
24.
Lecarpentier Y, Martin JL, Claes V, Chambaret JP, Migus A, Antonetti A, Hatt PY: Realtime kinetics of sarcomere relaxation by laser diffraction. Circ Res 1985; 56:331-9.
25.
Housmans PR, Lee NKM, Blinks JR: Active shortening retards the decline of intracellular calcium transient in mammalian heart muscle. Science 1983; 221:159-61.
26.
Coudray N, Beregi JP, Lecarpentier Y, Chemla D: Effects of isoproterenol on myocardial relaxation rate: Influence of the level of load. Am J Physiol 1993; 265:H1645-53.
27.
Nwasokwa ON: A model of the time course of myocardial dynamics: Use in characterisation of relaxation and evaluation of its indices. Cardiovasc Res 1993; 27:1510-21.
28.
Lynch C III: Effects of halothane and isoflurane on isolated human ventricular myocardium. Anesthesiology 1988; 68:429-32.
29.
Bosnjak ZJ, Supan FD, Rusch NJ: The effects of halothane, enflurane, and isoflurane on calcium currents in isolated canine ventricular cells. Anesthesiology 1991; 74:340-5.
30.
Haworth RA, Goknur AB: Inhibition of sodium/calcium exchange and calcium channels of heart cells by volatile anesthetics. Anesthesiology 1995; 82:1255-65.
31.
Komai H, Rusy BF: Direct effect of halothane and isoflurane on the function of the sarcoplasmic reticulum in intact rabbit atria. Anesthesiology 1990; 72:694-8.
32.
Wheeler DM, Katz A, Rice RT, Hansford RG: Volatile anesthetic effects on sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca content and sarcolemmal Ca flux in isolated rat cardiac cell suspensions. Anesthesiology 1994; 80:372-82.
33.
Connelly TJ, Coronado R: Activation of the Ca sup 2+ release channel of cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum by volatile anesthetics. Anesthesiology 1994; 81:459-69.
34.
Murat I, Ventura-Clapier R, Vassort G: Halothane, enflurane, and isoflurane decrease calcium sensitivity and maximal force in detergent-treated rat cardiac fibers. Anesthesiology 1988; 69:892-99.
35.
Housmans PR: Negative inotropy of halogenated anesthetics in ferret ventricular myocardium. Am J Physiol 1990; 259:H827-34.
36.
Kessler PD, Cates AE, Van Dop C, Feldman AM: Decreased bioactivity of the guanine nucleotide-binding protein that stimulates adenylate cyclase in hearts from cardiomyopathic Syrian hamsters. J Clin Invest 1989; 84:244-52.
37.
Panagia V, Singh JN, Anand-Svristava MB, Pierce GN, Jasmin G, Dhalla NS: Sarcolemmal alterations during the development of genetically determined cardiomyopathy. Cardiovasc Res 1984; 18:567-72.
38.
Wagner JA, Weisman HF, Snowman AM, Reynolds IJ, Weisfeldt ML, Snyder SH: Alterations in calcium antagonist receptors and sodium-calcium exchange in cardiomyopathic hamster tissues. Circ Res 1989; 65:205-14.
39.
Malhotra A: Regulatory proteins in hamster cardiomyopathy. Circ Res 1990; 66:1302-9.
40.
Whitmer JT, Kumar P, Solaro RJ: Calcium transport properties of cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum from cardiomyopathic Syrian hamsters (BIO 53.58 and 14.6): Evidence for a quantitative defect in dilated myopathic hearts not evident in hypertrophied hearts. Circ Res 1988; 62:81-5.
41.
Blanck TJJ, Thompson M: Enflurane and isoflurane stimulate calcium transport by cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum. Anesth Analg 1982; 61:142-5.
42.
Nelson TE, Sweo T: Ca sup 2+ uptake and Ca sup 2+ release by skeletal muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum: Differing sensitivity to inhalational anesthetics. Anesthesiology 1988; 69:571-7.
43.
Hanouz JL, Riou B, Massias L, Lecarpentier Y, Coriat P: Interaction of halothane with alpha- and beta-adrenoceptor stimulations in rat myocardium. Anesthesiology 1997; 86:147-59.
44.
Paradise NF, Schmitter JL, Surmitis JM: Criteria for adequate oxygenation of isometric kitten papillary muscles. Am J Physiol 1981; 241:H348-53.