Background

Minor cortical injury has previously been shown to improve survival in animals subjected to ischemic insults. Although the mechanism by which an ischemia-tolerant state is achieved is not clear, transient neuronal depolarization is thought to play a central role in the development of the tolerance. One way of producing transient neuronal depolarization is by the induction of cortical spreading depression (CSD). The present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of preischemic transient depolarization, induced by CSD, on postischemic neuronal outcome in rats.

Methods

Unilateral CSD was induced by application of KCl to the frontal cortex (CSD hemisphere) in three groups of isoflurane-anesthetized rats (CSD groups; n = 8/group). Sham animals (n = 12) did not undergo CSD. In a fifth group (n = 8), ketamine was administered during KCl application to inhibit CSD. One, three, or seven days after CSD, animals were subjected to forebrain ischemia produced by bilateral carotid artery occlusion. Injury to the striatum, hippocampus, and cortex was evaluated in hematoxylin and eosin-stained brain sections 3 days after ischemia.

Results

Preischemic CSD reduced postischemic injury in the ipsilateral cortex. The ratio of the number of injured neurons in the CSD hemisphere to that in the non-CSD hemisphere was significantly less in the groups subjected to CSD 1 day (0.51 +/- 0.33), 3 days (0.56 /- 0.22), and 7 days (0.40 +/- 0.17) before ischemia than in the sham operated group (1.11 +/- 0.47). In the ketamine group (CSD inhibition), there were no differences in the extent of injury in the two hemispheres (ratio = 0.84 +/- 0.47). Injury to the striatum and hippocampus was similar among the groups. Within each group, injury to these subcortical structures in the CSD hemisphere was not different from that in the non-CSD hemisphere.

Conclusions

The data suggest that preischemic depolarization induced by CSD results in an adaptive response that reduces the vulnerability of cortical neurons to subsequent ischemic injury (ischemic tolerance).

A number of investigators have demonstrated that relatively minor cortical injury (such as needle penetration of the cortex) can make neurons more tolerant to subsequent ischemic insults. [1,2] This tolerance-inducing effect of minor cortical injury is long-lasting and has been shown to provide robust cerebral protection. Although the mechanism by which ischemic tolerance is achieved is not clear, transient neuronal depolarization is common to the various insults that have been used to induce tolerance. [3] Cortical spreading depression (CSD) is one way of accomplishing this. This phenomenon is characterized by a propagating wave of transient neuronal depolarization. [4] Recent experimental studies have shown that spreading depression induced neuronal depolarization, when induced 1 day before cerebral ischemia, reduces subsequent ischemic injury. [5–7] This reduction in injury is comparable with that which can be attained by the use of putative neuroprotective agents. However, the duration of the resultant ischemic tolerance state has not been clearly defined. Accordingly, the present study was undertaken to determine the magnitude and duration of the preconditioning effect of CSD in a rat model of incomplete forebrain ischemia. Because NMDA receptor antagonists can inhibit the occurrence of CSD, the effect of the NMDA antagonist ketamine also was assessed to provide additional support for the association of CSD with the preconditioning effect.

The study was approved by the institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. All experimental procedures were performed in accordance with the guidelines established in The PHS Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Part I-Induction of CSD 

Initiation of KCl-induced CSD was monitored with Ag-AgCl electrodes in 10 animals. Six WKY rats were anesthetized with isoflurane (0.8%) and nitrous oxide (70%) in oxygen. After endotracheal intubation, the heads of the animals were secured in a stereotaxic frame. Two 4-mm diameter craniectomies were performed: 3 mm rostral, 3 mm lateral to the bregma; and 3 mm caudal, 3 mm lateral to bregma. Under direct visualization through a stereomicroscope, the underlying dura was incised carefully with a 30-gauge needle. Injury to the cortex was avoided. In the caudal craniectomy, a Ag-AgCl electrode with a tip diameter of 2–3 micro meter was inserted into the cortex to a depth of 200 micro meter. This electrode was referenced to a Ag-AgCl pellet inserted into the neck musculature. After a 15-min stabilization period, gelatin sponge (Upjohn Co., Kalamazoo, WI) soaked with 3 M KCl was applied to the cortex via the rostral craniectomy for 30 min. The ensuing CSD activity was recorded using a DC amplifier (World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL). In a separate group of four animals, isoflurane-nitrous oxide anesthesia was discontinued. Simultaneously, ketamine (50 mg/kg bolus and infusion at a rate of 20 mg [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] h sup -1) was administered. KCl was applied to the cortex, and the CSD activity was recorded as described previously.

Part II-Forebrain Ischemia Studies 

Non-fasted WKY rats were anesthetized with isoflurane. After endotracheal intubation, mechanical ventilation of the lungs was initiated with an inspired gas mixture of 2% isoflurane in 30% O2, balance N2O. A temperature probe was inserted into the temporalis muscle, and pericranial temperature was servoregulated to 37 [degree sign] Celsius. The animal's head was secured in a stereotaxic frame. After infiltration with 0.25% bupivacaine, the scalp was incised and reflected. The designated CSD hemisphere was randomly chosen. A 4-mm diameter craniectomy was made 2.5 mm lateral and 2.5 mm rostral to the bregma. Under a stereo microscope, the dura was incised and reflected. The end-tidal concentration of isoflurane was then reduced to 0.8%. Cortical spreading depression was induced by the application of gelatin sponge, soaked with 3 M KCl, onto the cortex for a period of 30 min. [8] Thereafter, the gelatin sponge was removed; the scalp was sutured, and the animal was allowed to awaken. On recovery of consciousness, the trachea was extubated. After an observation period of 2 h, the animal was returned to the animal care facility. In a separate group of animals, the NMDA antagonist ketamine (50 mg/kg bolus followed by a continuous infusion at a rate of 15 mg [center dot] kg sup -1 [center dot] h sup -1) was administered before KCl application.

Sham animals underwent all of the above procedures except craniectomy and KCl application. In these animals, one hemisphere was randomly designated the “CSD hemisphere.”

Ischemia was induced 1, 3, or 7 days after CSD induction (n = 8/group). Sham animals (n = 12) were rendered ischemic 1 and 3 days after CSD. Animals in the ketamine group (n = 8) were subjected to ischemia 3 days after CSD.

Fasted rats were anesthetized with isoflurane, and their tracheas were intubated. Mechanical ventilation was then instituted as described previously. Ventilatory parameters were adjusted to maintain normocapnia (PaCO2, 35–40 mmHg). A thermistor (Mon-A-Therm, Mallinckrodt, St. Louis, MO) was inserted between the temporalis muscle, and the skull and pericranial temperature was servoregulated to 37 [degree sign] Celsius. Needle electroencephalographic (EEG) electrodes were inserted in a biparietal configuration, and the EEG was monitored continuously (Grass Instruments, Quincy, MA). The tail artery and external jugular vein were cannulated. Both carotid arteries were exposed via a mid-line pretracheal incision and were encircled loosely with ligatures. The inspired concentration of isoflurane was reduced to 0.8%, and the animals were left undisturbed for an equilibration period of 15 min. Arterial pressure, heart rate, PaO2, PaCO2, pH, hematocrit, and serum glucose were measured during this period.

The animals' heads were then placed in a humidified plexiglass chamber as described previously. [9] Five minutes after the administration of 50 U heparin, 2.5 mg of trimethaphan was administered intravenously. Simultaneously, blood was withdrawn through the external jugular vein catheter into a syringe that was placed in a heated water bath (the temperature of the withdrawn blood was maintained at approximately 37 [degree sign] Celsius). At a MAP of 35 mmHg, both carotid arteries were occluded with vascular clips for 15 min. Ischemia was confirmed by the observation of an isoelectric EEG. Thereafter, the clips were removed, and reperfusion of the brain was established. The withdrawn blood was reinfused. The vascular catheters were removed, and the wounds were closed. All wounds were infiltrated with 0.25% bupivacaine. Anesthetic administration was then discontinued. On resumption of spontaneous ventilation, the endotracheal tube was removed, and the animals were placed in a humidified and heated chamber into which oxygen was flushed continuously. After an observation period of 2 h, the animals were returned to the animal care facility.

Histopathology 

Three days after forebrain ischemia, the animals were anesthetized with pentobarbital. They were killed by transcardiac perfusion with heparinized saline, followed by 200 ml of phosphate buffered paraformaldehyde. The animals were decapitated, and the brains were refrigerated in situ at 4 [degree sign] Celsius for 24–48 h. The brains were then removed carefully. After dehydration in graded concentrations of ethanol and butanol, the brains were embedded in paraffin. Eight- micron thick coronal sections were prepared and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Injury to the dorsolateral striatum, rostral hippocampus (CA1 and CA3 sectors), and ventral hippocampus (CA1 and CA3 sectors) was evaluated in coronal planes 600 micro meter, 3,300 micro meter, and 6,000 micro meter posterior to the bregma, respectively, according to the atlas of the rat brain of Palkovits and Brownstein. [10] Injury to these structures was graded on a four-point scale as described previously:[9] 0 = no injury; 1 = less than 10% of neurons injured; 2 = between 10% and 50% neurons injured; 3 = greater than 50% neurons injured. Injury to the parietal and temporal-occipital cortex was evaluated in coronal planes 3,300 micro meter and 6,000 micro meter posterior to the bregma. Within each hemisphere, injured cortical neurons were counted in eight successive high power fields (400 x) that spanned the entire depth of the cortex, from the entorhinal fissure to the interhemispheric fissure. Histologic evaluation was performed by two observers who had no knowledge of the experimental group assignment.

Statistical Analysis 

Data from the sham group animals (made ischemic 1 and 3 days after sham CSD) were summated. Physiologic data were analyzed by a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Post hoc differences among groups were identified by Scheffe's test. Histologic scores were analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis test. Cortical injury to the CSD hemisphere, presented as a percent of that in the non-CSD hemisphere, was also analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis test. Differences among groups were identified by the Mann-Whitney U tests with an appropriate Bonferroni correction factor for multiple comparisons. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. All data are presented as mean +/- SD.

Part I-Induction of CSD 

The application of 3 M KCl to the cortical surface reliably produced CSD activity in the animals anesthetized with isoflurane and nitrous oxide (Figure 1). In 30 min, approximately 8–10 CSD waves were detected (median, 8; range, 8–10). In the four ketamine anesthetized animals, CSD waves were not detected, confirming that the dose of ketamine administered was effective in preventing CSD.

Figure 1. Spreading depression waves, monitored in the parietal cortex, after application of KCl to the frontal cortex in anesthetized rats. During isoflurane and nitrous oxide anesthesia, recurrent CSD activity was detected (between 8 and 10 CSD waves were observed within a 30-min interval). CSD activity was not detected in animals to which ketamine had been administered.

Figure 1. Spreading depression waves, monitored in the parietal cortex, after application of KCl to the frontal cortex in anesthetized rats. During isoflurane and nitrous oxide anesthesia, recurrent CSD activity was detected (between 8 and 10 CSD waves were observed within a 30-min interval). CSD activity was not detected in animals to which ketamine had been administered.

Close modal

Part II-Forebrain Ischemia Studies 

The physiologic parameters in the animals that were subjected to ischemia after CSD are presented in Table 1. Physiologic parameters among the experimental groups were not different.

Table 1. Physiologic Variables in the Experimental Groups 

Table 1. Physiologic Variables in the Experimental Groups 
Table 1. Physiologic Variables in the Experimental Groups 

Cortex. The number of injured neurons in the CSD and non-CSD hemispheres in each animal in the five experimental groups is presented in Table 2. In Figure 2, injury to the CSD hemisphere is presented as a percent of the injury in the non-CSD hemisphere. Preischemic CSD significantly reduced cortical injury in the hemisphere ipsilateral to CSD. This protective effect of CSD was observed 24 h after CSD and was still evident 3 and 7 days after CSD. Ketamine, which inhibited CSD, abolished the protective effect of previous KCl application, i.e., there was no interhemispheric difference in the extent of injury in this group.

Table 2. Number of Injured Neurons in the CSD and non-CSD (nCSD) Hemispheres in the Experimental Groups 

Table 2. Number of Injured Neurons in the CSD and non-CSD (nCSD) Hemispheres in the Experimental Groups 
Table 2. Number of Injured Neurons in the CSD and non-CSD (nCSD) Hemispheres in the Experimental Groups 

Figure 2. The ratio of injured cortical neurons in the CSD and non-CSD hemisphere in the cortex in the study groups is presented in this figure. Reduced injury in the CSD hemisphere will result in a ratio of less than one. In the groups subjected to CSD 1, 3, and 7 days before ischemia, injury to the CSD hemisphere was substantially less than in the non-CSD hemisphere. In the animals that received ketamine during cortical KCl application, there was no difference in the extent of injury between the CSD and non-CSD hemisphere. * P < 0.05 vs. Sham group.

Figure 2. The ratio of injured cortical neurons in the CSD and non-CSD hemisphere in the cortex in the study groups is presented in this figure. Reduced injury in the CSD hemisphere will result in a ratio of less than one. In the groups subjected to CSD 1, 3, and 7 days before ischemia, injury to the CSD hemisphere was substantially less than in the non-CSD hemisphere. In the animals that received ketamine during cortical KCl application, there was no difference in the extent of injury between the CSD and non-CSD hemisphere. * P < 0.05 vs. Sham group.

Close modal

In the animals that were subjected to CSD, cortical injury at the site of KCl application was evident. The injury was limited to the craniectomy site and extended into the cortex to a depth of 1–1.5 mm.

Subcortical Structures. The histologic scores in the striatum and hippocampus are presented in Table 3. Within each group, there were no differences between the CSD hemisphere and the non-CSD hemisphere. There were also no differences among the groups in the extent of injury. In all groups, severe injury to the striatum and rostral CA1 sector of the hippocampus was observed. In most animals, more than 50% of the neurons were injured (grade 3) in these structures. Injury to the rostral CA3 sector was not as severe. The ventral CA1 sector of the hippocampus was injured the least; the median grade of injury was 1.

Table 3. Histologic Scores in the Striatum and Dorsal and Ventral Hippocampus 

Table 3. Histologic Scores in the Striatum and Dorsal and Ventral Hippocampus 
Table 3. Histologic Scores in the Striatum and Dorsal and Ventral Hippocampus 

The present study was conducted to evaluate the influence of preischemic transient neuronal depolarization, induced by cortical spreading depression (CSD), on postischemic neuronal outcome. The results demonstrate that preischemic transient depolarization produced by spreading depression can reduce ischemic neuronal injury, but only in the cortex. In the cortex, this ischemic preconditioning effect was seen 24 h after CSD induction and was still evident 7 days later. Two observations suggest that ischemic preconditioning was a result of depolarization induced by CSD rather than other effects of cortical injury produced by KCl application. First, the reduction in injury was seen in a cortical region that was remote from the site of surgical craniectomy. In the striatum and hippocampus, preischemic CSD did not attenuate injury after forebrain ischemia. This observation is not inconsistent as CSD waves, when elicited in the cortex, do not depolarize subcortical structures. [11] Second, ketamine, an NMDA antagonist that inhibited CSD, abolished the ischemic preconditioning.

The observation that the protective effects of previous CSD-induced depolarization were evident as late as 7 days after CSD indicate that tolerance induced by CSD is long-lasting. The time course of this preconditioning effect in our study is different from that reported recently by Kawahara et al. [6] In a rat model of cardiac arrest ischemia, these investigators demonstrated that the protective effect of previous spreading depression was observed only 3 days after spreading depression but not 1 day and 7 days after spreading depression. The reason for these varying results may lie in the differing approach to the evaluation of neuronal injury. In the study of Kawahara et al., spreading depression was induced in the cortex and in the hippocampus, although neuronal injury was evaluated in only the hippocampus. By contrast, in the present study, neuronal injury was specifically evaluated within the cortex. It is entirely possible that the preconditioning effect of CSD varies from structure to structure and also may vary, depending on the nature of the preconditioning stress.

The recent work of Matsushima et al. [12] and of Kobayashi et al. [7] also is consistent with our observation CSD that induced preconditioning may be apparent within 24 h. These investigators observed a reduction in cortical injury in animals that were subjected to CSD 24 h before an episode of focal ischemia. Accordingly, the available data therefore clearly indicate that a preconditioning effect may be apparent as early as 24 h after CSD. However, the precise duration of the preconditioning effect has yet to be determined. In that connection, the present study has extended the findings from other investigations further by the demonstration that the tolerance-inducing effect of preischemic spreading depression lasts at least 7 days. The possibility exists that this effect might persist for a period greater than 7 days, and the total duration remains to be defined.

Ischemic preconditioning has also been shown to occur after short episodes of sublethal ischemia (ischemia of a brief duration that does not itself result in ischemic neuronal injury). In gerbils, sublethal ischemia produced by bilateral carotid artery occlusion for 2 min has been demonstrated to result in the induction of tolerance to subsequent episodes of ischemia. [13–15] In preconditioned gerbils subjected to ischemia from 1 to 7 days after the sublethal ischemia, ischemic injury to the hippocampus, striatum, and neocortex was reduced substantially. [15] This tolerance-inducing effect of previous sublethal ischemia lasted at least 7 days but dissipated after 2 weeks. MK-801, when administered during the sublethal ischemia, abolished the preconditioning effect. [16] Accordingly, tolerance induced by CSD and by sublethal ischemia is similar in at least two respects: the duration of tolerance persists for at least 7 days and the induction of tolerance can be abolished by NMDA antagonists. However, the extent of tolerance induced by these two techniques appears to be different. In the study of Kato et al., [15] sublethal ischemia provided almost complete protection against subsequent ischemia in the neocortex. By contrast, in the present study, CSD-induced tolerance was not as complete. Within the CSD hemisphere, considerable neuronal necrosis in the cortex was evident, although it was substantially less than in the non-CSD hemisphere.

The mechanism by which CSD produced ischemic preconditioning is not clear at present. One possibility is that CSD causes the synthesis of substances that can reduce the vulnerability of neurons to ischemic injury. CSD has been shown to lead to the synthesis of mRNA for nerve growth factory (NGF)[17] and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). [18] In vitro, NGF has been found to protect hippocampal and cortical neurons from hypoglycemic injury [18–20] and striatal neurons from excitotoxic injury. [21] Similarly, BDNF has been shown to reduce hypoglycemic injury to dentate granule cells [18] and excitotoxic injury to cerebellar granule cells. [22] In addition, the widespread cortical synthesis of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) mRNA that occurs after cortical ablation injury has been attributed to the occurrence of CSD. [23] In cultured rat hippocampal and human cortical neurons, bFGF reduces hypoglycemic injury. [20] Collectively, these data suggest that CSD can lead to the synthesis of several endogenous and potentially neuroprotective factors [24] that might contribute to the preconditioning effect observed in the present study.

It is also possible that CSD reduces the rate at which energy depletion occurs during ischemia. The data of Kawahara et al. indicate that CSD reduces CMR glucose as long as 3 days after CSD is elicited. [5] Ischemia-induced anoxic depolarization is thought to occur when the available ATP stores are depleted. [25] One can therefore speculate that the onset of anoxic depolarization might have been delayed in the CSD hemisphere because of CMR reduction. If so, then the reduction of injury in the CSD hemisphere may have been due to a reduced effective duration of ischemia (as measured by the duration of anoxic depolarization). However, this concept remains a matter of speculation and experimental clarification is needed.

In the present study, injury to the CSD hemisphere was compared with that in the non-CSD hemisphere. The major advantage of this approach was that in each animal, the non-CSD hemisphere served as the control. The effect of interanimal variability in the severity of the injury was reduced significantly. However, inherent to this experimental design is the assumption that the severity of ischemia is similar in both hemispheres in each animal. Gionet et al. have shown that there may be a considerable amount of interhemispheric variability in the severity of injury in the forebrain ischemia model. However, they demonstrated that this variability can be reduced by decreasing the absolute level of blood pressure that is maintained during ischemia. [26] A target level of 35 mmHg (in contrast to the more commonly used intraischemic pressure of 50 mmHg [27]) during ischemia was therefore chosen to minimize this variability. In addition, the injury to the subcortical structures was similar in the CSD and non-CSD hemisphere. These data provide support for the validity of a comparison of injury in the CSD hemisphere to that in the non-CSD hemisphere.

In summary, the results of this study show that previous CSD induces tolerance against subsequent ischemic injury. This CSD-mediated ischemic preconditioning is evident 24 h after CSD and persists for at least 7 days. Ketamine, an NMDA antagonist and proven inhibitor of CSD, abolished this preconditioning effect. The mechanisms by which CSD induced ischemic tolerance are not clear at present. Identification of these mechanisms may provide insight into potentially novel therapeutic approaches that might be used to reduce postischemic neuronal injury.

1.
Shimoji K, Takahata Y, Fujiwara N, Endoh H, Taga K, Ohama E: Effects of pentobarbital and ketamine on brain injury-induced anti-ischemic activity. Brain Res 1987; 408:385-8.
2.
Takahata Y, Shimoji K: Brain injury improves survival of mice following brain ischemia. Brain Res 1986; 381:368-71.
3.
Abe H, Xu ZC, Nowak TS: Threshold depolarization intervals for ischemic tolerance vs. espression of hsp72 and other ischemia-induced mRNAs. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1995; 15 (Suppl 1):S67.
4.
Hansen AJ, Olsen CE: Brain extracellular space during spreading depression and ischemia. Acta Physiol Scand 1980; 108:355-65.
5.
Kawahara N, Reutzler CA, Wiegand SJ, SCroll, Klatzo I: Induction of protective mechanisms in cerebral ischemia. Soc Neurosci Abstracts 1994; 20:1480.
6.
Kawahara N, Ruetzler CA, Klatzo I: Protective effect of spreading depression against neuronal damage following cardiac arrest cerebral ischaemia. Neurol Res 1995; 17(1):9-16.
7.
Kobayashi S, Harris VA, Welsh FA: Spreading depression induces tolerance of cortical neurons to ischemia in rat brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1995; 15: 721-7.
8.
Krivanek J: Effect of spreading cortical depression on the incorporation of [sup 14 C]leucine into proteins of rat brain. J Neurochem 1970; 17:531-8.
9.
Sano T, Drummond JC, Patel PM, Grafe MR, Watson JC, Cole DJ: A comparison of the cerebral protective effects of isoflurane and mild hypothermia in a rat model of incomplete forebrain ischemia. Anesthesiology 1992; 76:221-8.
10.
Palkovits M, Brownstein MJ: Maps and Guide to Microdissection of the Rat Brain. New York: Elsevier, 1988.
11.
Herrera DG, Robertson HA: Application to potassium chloride to the brain surface induces the c-fos-proto-oncogene: reversal by MK-801. Brain Res 1990; 510:166-70.
12.
Matsushima K, Hogan MJ, Hakim AM: Cortical spreading depression protects against subsequent focal cerebral ischemia in rats. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1996; 16:221-6.
13.
Kitagawa K, Matsumoto M, Tagaya M, Hata R, Ueda H, Niinobe M, Handa N, Fukunaga R, Kimura K, Mikoshiba K, Kamada T: Ischemic tolerance phenomenon found in the brain. Brain Res 1990; 528:21-4.
14.
Kirino T, Tsujita Y, Tamura A: Induced tolerance to ischemia in gerbil hippocampal neurons. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1991; 11:299-307.
15.
Kato H, Liu Y, Araki T, Kogure K: Temporal profile of the effects of pretreatment with brief cerebral ischemia on the neuronal damage following secondary ischemic insult in the gerbil: Cumulative damage and protective effects. Brain Res 1991; 553:238-42.
16.
Kato H, Liu Y, Araki T, Kogure K: MK-801, but not anisomycin, inhibits the induction of tolerance to ischemia in the gerbil hippocampus. Neurosci Lett 1992; 139:118-21.
17.
Herrera DG, Maysinger D, Gadient R, Boeckh C, Otten U, Cuello AC: Spreading depression induces c-fos-like immunoreactivity and NGF mRNA in the rat cerebral cortex. Brain Res 1993; 602:99-103.
18.
Kokaia Z, Othberg A, Kokaia M, Lindvall O: BDNF makes cultured dentate granule cells more resistant to hypoglycaemic damage. Neuroreport 1994; 5:1241-4.
19.
Cheng B, Mattson MP: NT-3 and BDNF protect CNS neurons against metabolic/excitotoxic insults. Brain Res 1994; 640(1-2):56-67.
20.
Cheng B, Mattson MP: NGF and bFGF protect rat hippocampal and human cortical neurons against hypoglycemic damage by stabilizing calcium homeostasis. Neuron 1991; 7: 1031-41.
21.
Schumacher JM, Short MP, Hyman BT, Breakefield XO, Isacson O: Intracerebral implantation of nerve growth factor-producing fibroblasts protects striatum against neurotoxic levels of excitatory amino acids. Neuroscience 1991; 45(3):561-70.
22.
Lindholm D, Denchant G, Heisenberg CP, Thoenen H: Brain-derived neurotrophic factor is a survival factor for cultured rat cerebellar granule neurons and protects them against glutamate-induced neurotoxicity. Eur J Neurosci 1993; 5:1455-64.
23.
Yuguchi T, Kohmura E, Yamada K, Wanaka A, Otsuki H, Sakaguchi T, Yamashita T, Tohyama M, Hayakawa T: Messenger RNA and protein expression of basic fibroblast growth factor receptor after cortical ablation. Mol Brain Res 1994; 25:50-6.
24.
Mattson MP, Scheff SW: Endogenous neuroprotection factors and traumatic brain injury: Mechanisms of action and implications for therapy. J Neurotrauma 1994; 11(1):3-33.
25.
Nakashima K, Todd MM, Warner DS: The relation between cerebral metabolic rate and ischemic depolarization. A comparison of the effects of hypothermia, pentobarbital, and isoflurane. Anesthesiology 1995; 82(5):1199-208.
26.
Gionet TX, Warner DS, Verhaegen M, Thomas JD, Todd MM: Effects of intra-ischemic blood pressure on outcome from 2-vessel occlusion forebrain ischemia in the rat. Brain Res 1992; 586(2):188-94.
27.
Smith ML, Bendek G, Dahlgren N, Rosen I, Wieloch T, Siesjo BK: Models for studying long-term recovery following forebrain ischemia in the rat. A 2-vessel occlusion model. Acta Neurol Scand 1984; 69:385-401.