Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Meeting Abstracts|
September 1991
PROPOFOL BOLUS VS INFUSION: COMPARISON WITH MIDAZOLAM FOR MONITORED SEDATION
Dept Anes/CCM, Memorial Sloan-Kettering & Cornell University Medical College, New York NY 10021.
Anesthesiology September 1991, Vol. 75, A20.
Citation
M. G. Pratila, M. E. Fischer, R. Alagesan, R. Alagesan, R. Reinsel, D. Pratilas; PROPOFOL BOLUS VS INFUSION: COMPARISON WITH MIDAZOLAM FOR MONITORED SEDATION. Anesthesiology 1991; 75:A20 doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199109001-00020
Download citation file:
143
Views
Citing articles via
Most Viewed
Related Articles
A4 PROPOFOL VS MIDAZOLAM FOR SEDATION: A COMPARISON OF RECOVERY PARAMETERS
Anesthesiology (September 1990)
Economic Evaluation of Propofol for Sedation of Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Units
Anesthesiology (January 2002)
Electroencephalogram Bispectral Analysis Predicts the Depth of Midazolam-induced Sedation
Anesthesiology (January 1996)
A1114 ANESTHESIA FOR PEDIATRIC CANCER PATIENTS: KETAHINE, ETOHIDATE OR PROFOFOL?
Anesthesiology (September 1990)
Drug-induced Amnesia Is a Separate Phenomenon from Sedation: Electrophysiologic Evidence
Anesthesiology (October 2001)