Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Correspondence|
July 1991
Spinal Anesthesia in Infants: Could a L5-S1 Approach Be Safer?
Charles M. Haberkern, M.D.
Charles M. Haberkern, M.D.
Search for other works by this author on:
Associate Clinical Professor of Anesthesiology and Pediatrics
Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology and Pediatrics Department of Anesthesiology / RN-10 University of Washington and Children's Hospital and Medical Center 4800 Sand Point Way N.E. P. O. Box C5371 Seattle, Washington 98105
Anesthesiology July 1991, Vol. 75, 169.
Citation
Rosemary J. Orr, Charles M. Haberkern; Spinal Anesthesia in Infants: Could a L5-S1 Approach Be Safer?. Anesthesiology 1991; 75:169 doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199107000-00038
Download citation file:
139
Views
Citing articles via
Most Viewed
Related Articles
Randomized Placebo-controlled Study Evaluating Lateral Branch Radiofrequency Denervation for Sacroiliac Joint Pain
Anesthesiology (August 2008)
Size of Human Lower Thoracic and Lumbosacral Nerve Roots
Anesthesiology (July 1996)
Effects of Epidural Saline Injection on Cerebrospinal Fluid Volume and Velocity Waveform: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
Anesthesiology (February 2005)
Spinal Anesthesia in Infants: Could a L5-S1 Approach Be Safer?
Anesthesiology (July 1991)
Epidural Epinephrine and Clonidine : Segmental Analgesia and Effects on Different Pain Modalities
Anesthesiology (October 1997)
