Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Correspondence|
September 1990
Train-of-four Ratio Is Not Always Independent of Stimulating Current
Mitchel B. Sosis, M.D., Ph.D.
Mitchel B. Sosis, M.D., Ph.D.
Search for other works by this author on:
Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology
Department of Anesthesiology Rush-Presbyterian—St. Luke's Medical Center Chicago, Illinois 60612
Anesthesiology September 1990, Vol. 73, 573.
Citation
Mitchel B. Sosis; Train-of-four Ratio Is Not Always Independent of Stimulating Current. Anesthesiology 1990; 73:573 doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199009000-00039
Download citation file:
Citing articles via
Most Viewed
Related Articles
Can Acceleromyography Detect Low Levels of Residual Paralysis?: A Probability Approach to Detect a Mechanomyographic Train-of-four Ratio of 0.9
Anesthesiology (May 2004)
Relationship of the Train-of-four Fade Ratio to Clinical Signs and Symptoms of Residual Paralysis in Awake Volunteers
Anesthesiology (April 1997)
Preanesthetic Train-of-four Fade Predicts the Atracurium Requirement of Myasthenia Gravis Patients
Anesthesiology (August 2000)
Reversal of Vecuronium-induced Neuromuscular Blockade with Low-dose Sugammadex at Train-of-four Count of Four: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Anesthesiology (September 2017)
Effect of an Intubating Dose of Succinylcholine and Atracurium on the Diaphragm and the Adductor Pollicis Muscle in Humans
Anesthesiology (September 1987)