Complex Information for Anesthesiologists Presented Quickly and Clearly

Traditional local anesthetics act by inhibiting the voltage-gated sodium channels that are responsible for neuronal conduction. Local anesthetics, including lidocaine, bupivacaine, and tetracaine, diffuse across the plasma membrane and bind deep within the pore of the transmembrane sodium channel, thereby completely blocking the entry of sodium into the cell and thus preventing neuronal conduction. In contrast, there are a group of toxins that bind with varying degrees of affinity to the extracellular domain of the sodium channel, preventing neuronal discharge via a discrete mechanism of action. Tetrodotoxin, the molecule derived from the puffer fish, a delicacy that when poorly prepared can be fatal, is the best known of these so-called “site 1” sodium channel blockers. Saxitoxin and neosaxitoxin, small molecules synthesized by marine dinoflagellates and freshwater cyanobacteria, are also site 1 sodium channels blockers. Neosaxitoxin has poor affinity for the cardiac isoform of the sodium channel and does not cross the blood–brain barrier, thus this compound is virtually devoid of cardiac and central nervous system toxicity—the limiting toxicities of traditional local anesthetics. Nonetheless, systemic distribution at higher doses of saxitoxins does lead to facial paresthesias and respiratory insufficiency. As demonstrated in this issue of Anesthesiology,1,2 when neosaxitoxin and bupivacaine are administered concomitantly, a prolonged-duration sensory block is created without evidence of added cardiac or central nervous system toxicity, demonstrating the potential for prolonged, but reversible, neural blockade.

Infographic created by James P. Rathmell, M.D., Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Harvard Medical School; Gary Strichartz, Ph.D., Brigham and Women’s Health Care; and Jonathan Wanderer, M.D., Vanderbilt University School of Medicine. Illustration by James P. Rathmell, M.D., and Annemarie Johnson, Vivo Visuals. Dr. Wanderer is funded by the Foundation for Anesthesia Education and Research, Schaumburg, Illinois, and Anesthesia Quality Institute’s Mentored Research Training Grant–Health Services Research, Schaumburg, Illinois. Address correspondence to Dr. Rathmell: jrathmell@bwh.harvard.edu.

1.
Lobo
K
,
Donado
C
,
Cornelissen
L
,
Kim
J
,
Ortiz
R
,
Peake
RWA
,
Kellogg
M
,
Alexander
ME
,
Zurakowski
D
,
Kurgansky
KE
,
Peyton
J
,
Bilge
A
,
Boretsky
K
,
McCann
ME
,
Berde
CB
,
Cravero
J
:
A phase 1, dose-escalation, double-blind, block-randomized, controlled trial of safety and efficacy of neosaxitoxin alone and in combination with 0.2% bupivacaine, with and without epinephrine, for cutaneous anesthesia.
Anesthesiology
2015
;
123
:
873
85
2.
Templin
JS
,
Wylie
MC
,
Kim
JD
,
Kurgansky
KE
,
Gorski
G
,
Kheir
J
,
Zurakowski
D
,
Corfas
G
,
Berde
C
:
Neosaxitoxin in rat sciatic block: Improved therapeutic index using combinations with bupivacaine, with and without epinephrine.
Anesthesiology
2015
;
123
:
886
98

Competing Interests

Dr. Wanderer is funded by the Foundation for Anesthesia Education and Research, Schaumburg, Illinois, and Anesthesia Quality Institute’s Mentored Research Training Grant–Health Services Research, Schaumburg, Illinois.

free