Background

Many general anesthetics are thought to produce a loss of wakefulness, in part, by enhancing gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) neurotransmission. However, GABAergic neurotransmission in the pontine reticular formation promotes wakefulness. This study tested the hypotheses that (1) relative to wakefulness, isoflurane decreases GABA levels in the pontine reticular formation; and (2) pontine reticular formation administration of drugs that increase or decrease GABA levels increases or decreases, respectively, isoflurane induction time.

Methods

To test hypothesis 1, cats (n = 5) received a craniotomy and permanent electrodes for recording the electroencephalogram and electromyogram. Dialysis samples were collected from the pontine reticular formation during isoflurane anesthesia and wakefulness. GABA levels were quantified using high-performance liquid chromatography. For hypothesis 2, rats (n = 10) were implanted with a guide cannula aimed for the pontine reticular formation. Each rat received microinjections of Ringer's (vehicle control), the GABA uptake inhibitor nipecotic acid, and the GABA synthesis inhibitor 3-mercaptopropionic acid. Rats were then anesthetized with isoflurane, and induction time was quantified as loss of righting reflex. Breathing rate was also measured.

Results

Relative to wakefulness, GABA levels were significantly decreased by isoflurane. Increased power in the electroencephalogram and decreased activity in the electromyogram caused by isoflurane covaried with pontine reticular formation GABA levels. Nipecotic acid and 3-mercaptopropionic acid significantly increased and decreased, respectively, isoflurane induction time. Nipecotic acid also increased breathing rate.

Conclusion

Decreasing pontine reticular formation GABA levels comprises one mechanism by which isoflurane causes loss of consciousness, altered cortical excitability, muscular hypotonia, and decreased respiratory rate.

THE pontine reticular formation is part of the ascending reticular activating system, contributes to the electroencephalographic activation characteristic of wakefulness,1and is involved in generating rapid eye movement (REM) sleep2and some traits of general anesthesia.3Synaptic terminals from local and distant γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)–containing neurons4,5as well as GABA type A (GABAA) receptors6–8are present in the pontine reticular formation and modulate behavioral arousal. For example, microinjecting the GABAAreceptor agonist muscimol into the pontine reticular formation increases wakefulness.9,10Conversely, microinjecting the GABAAreceptor antagonist bicuculline into the pontine reticular formation increases REM sleep and decreases wakefulness.10,11Dialysis delivery of bicuculline to cat pontine reticular formation increases local acetylcholine release and also triggers REM sleep.12Furthermore, administering drugs that selectively increase or decrease GABA levels into rat pontine reticular formation causes an increase or decrease, respectively, in wakefulness.13The foregoing data suggest that GABAergic transmission in the pontine reticular formation suppresses sleep and promotes wakefulness.

Most anesthetic drugs potentiate GABAAreceptor–mediated inhibition, and this potentiation is thought to comprise part of the mechanism by which general anesthetics produce hypnosis.14,15Given the role of the pontine reticular formation in promoting wakefulness and causing activation of the cortical electroencephalogram,3anesthetics are likely to alter GABAergic neurotransmission within the pontine reticular formation to produce a loss of wakefulness. No previous studies have quantified the effect of isoflurane anesthesia on endogenous GABA levels within the pontine reticular formation. The current study used in vivo  microdialysis to test the hypothesis that, relative to wakefulness, isoflurane decreases extracellular GABA levels in the pontine reticular formation. The effects of isoflurane on electroencephalographic power and skeletal muscle tone also were quantified. To further explore the relation between GABA levels in the pontine reticular formation and isoflurane-induced loss of wakefulness, this study next examined the effects of pharmacologically altering endogenous GABA levels in the pontine reticular formation on isoflurane induction time and rate of breathing. Intracranial microinjection of a GABA uptake inhibitor and a GABA synthesis inhibitor was used to test the hypothesis that isoflurane induction time is increased by increasing pontine reticular formation GABA levels, and decreased by decreasing pontine reticular formation GABA levels.

Animals and Chemicals

All animal procedures were approved by the University of Michigan Committee on Use and Care of Animals and conducted in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals  (National Academies Press, Washington D.C., 1996‡) and the Guidelines for the Care and Use of Mammals in Neuroscience and Behavioral Research  (National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., 2003§). In vivo  microdialysis experiments designed to measure GABA levels, activation of the cortical electroencephalogram, and skeletal muscle tone during wakefulness and isoflurane anesthesia were conducted in cats. Adult male cats (n = 5) were purchased from Harlan (Indianapolis, IN). Several lines of evidence support the use of the cat as an experimental animal for these preclinical studies. First, most of what is currently known about brain stem neurophysiologic mechanisms regulating arousal state is derived from studies using cats.2Second, the large size of the cat brain stem16provides optimal spatial resolution for accurate stereotaxic placement of microdialysis probes. Third, numerous studies have shown that neurotransmitter systems within the pontine reticular formation of cats are altered by anesthetic17–19and analgesic20,21drugs currently used in clinical practice. Finally, pontine GABAergic transmission in cats modulates arousal state.10Therefore, in the current study, the cat provided an ideal model for gaining insights into mechanisms of anesthetic action and arousal state control.

Intracranial microinjection studies designed to determine the effects on isoflurane induction time of drugs that increase or decrease pontine reticular formation GABA levels were performed using rats. Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 10) were purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Wilmington, MA). Rats were used for this portion of the study for multiple reasons. First, loss of righting reflex studies are commonly performed using rats, not cats. Second, similar to cats, GABAergic mechanisms in rat pontine reticular formation have been shown to promote wakefulness and inhibit sleep.9,11,13Third, the relatively large sample size required for these experiments made use of cats economically unfeasible.

Chemicals for Ringer's solution, o -phosphoric acid, sodium phosphate dibasic, sucrose, and formalin were purchased from Fischer Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA). High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)–grade methanol, acetonitrile, sodium tetraborate decahydrate, β-mercaptoethanol, nipecotic acid, 3-mercaptopropionic acid (3-MPA), and GABA were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). O -phthaldialdehyde was purchased from Mallinckrodt (St. Louis, MO).

Surgical Preparation of Cats for In Vivo  Microdialysis Studies

Surgery to prepare cats for subsequent microdialysis, studies was performed under sterile conditions, as described previously.12Briefly, cats were anesthetized by mask induction with isoflurane and placed in a stereotaxic frame (David Kopf Instruments, Tujunga, CA) equipped with a Kopf 880 semichronic head holder. Standard recording electrodes were implanted for objective assessment of arousal state.22A permanent craniotomy was created over the cerebellum and sealed with sterile Bone Wax (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ). The craniotomy provided subsequent access for a microdialysis probe to be placed in the pontine reticular formation. The recording electrodes and two parallel stainless steel tubes that attach to the Kopf 880 holder were secured to the skull with dental acrylic. The Kopf 880 holder and these tubes allowed placement of the animal in stereotaxic position during dialysis experiments without using ear bars. Cats were allowed to recover from surgery and were conditioned to the experimental setting for 3 weeks before starting experiments.

In Vivo  Microdialysis: Study Design and Procedures

All experiments were conducted at the same time of day. Sample collection began between 10:30 and 12:30 h, and experiments lasted 3.5–4 h. Two groups of microdialysis experiments were performed. Group 1 experiments aimed to (1) determine the time needed to achieve stable GABA levels after a dialysis probe is inserted into the pontine reticular formation during general anesthesia, and (2) test the hypothesis that GABA levels in cat pontine reticular formation are greater during postanesthesia wakefulness than during anesthesia. Group 2 experiments aimed to determine (1) the amount of time required to achieve stable GABA levels after dialysis probe placement into the pontine reticular formation during wakefulness, and (2) whether GABA levels in the pontine reticular formation are greater during wakefulness than during anesthesia when wakefulness precedes anesthesia. Therefore, the second set of experiments served to ensure that an order effect did not account for differences in GABA levels during anesthesia and wakefulness.

Each group 1 experiment began by mask induction with isoflurane. The vocal cords were sprayed with 1% lidocaine, the trachea was intubated with a pediatric endotracheal tube, and the cat was mechanically ventilated using a SAV 2500 Anesthesia Ventilator (SurgiVet, Waukesha, WI). The animal was placed in stereotaxic position, and end-tidal isoflurane and carbon dioxide concentrations, core body temperature, heart rate, and blood oxygen saturation were continuously monitored (Cardiocap/5 Datex-Ohmeda, Louisville, MO and Ohmeda Biox 3700 Pulse Oximeter, Boulder, CO). Core body temperature was maintained at 37.5°C using a water-filled heating pad connected to a T500 T/Pump Heat Therapy System (Gaymar Industries, Inc., Orchard Park, NY). End tidal concentrations of carbon dioxide and isoflurane were maintained throughout the experiment at 30–33 mmHg and 2.1–2.2% (1.1–1.2 minimum alveolar concentration [MAC]23), respectively (Cardiocap/5 Datex-Ohmeda).

Once all monitors were in place, a stainless steel guide tube was stereotaxically aimed for the pontine reticular formation. Selected stereotaxic coordinates16for dialysis aim sites ranged from: anterior 1.0 to 3.0 mm, lateral 1.0 to 2.5 mm, and horizontal −4 to −5 mm. Each dialysis site was used for only one experiment and was separated from other aim sites by at least 1 mm in the anterior-posterior and mediolateral planes. A custom-made microdialysis probe (CMA/10 or 12; CMA Microdialysis, North Chelmsford, MA) with a shaft length of 70 mm and polycarbonate membrane (20-kd cutoff, 2-mm length, 0.5-mm diameter) was inserted into the guide tube. The probe was continuously perfused with Ringer's solution (147.0 mm NaCl, 2.4 mm CaCl2, 4.0 mm KCl, 1.0 mm MgSO4, pH 6.0) at a flow rate of 3.0 μl/min using a CMA/400 syringe pump.

Thirty sequential dialysis samples (15 μl each, 5 min/sample) were collected during isoflurane anesthesia. Sample collection started 20 min after probe insertion. After the first 30 samples, anesthesia was discontinued, and additional samples were collected during wakefulness after recovery from anesthesia. All dialysis samples were collected on ice for subsequent analysis.

For group 2 experiments, a dialysis probe was stereotaxically aimed for the pontine reticular formation in the awake cat. Animals were permitted to sleep ad libitum  during the first 120 min of dialysis, during which time GABA levels stabilized. Thereafter, using mild auditory and nonnociceptive stimulation, cats were kept awake (minutes 125–170) during sample collection (n = 10 samples/experiment). After the last dialysis sample was collected during wakefulness, cats were anesthetized, intubated, and ventilated until stable anesthesia was achieved, and 10 additional dialysis samples were collected during anesthesia.

For all experiments, after collecting the last dialysis sample, the dialysis probe and guide tube were removed from the brain. The craniotomy was sealed with bone wax, and the animal was observed until it had fully recovered. The animal was then returned to its home cage in the Unit for Laboratory Animal Medicine.

Quantification of GABA Using HPLC and Electrochemical Detection

Quantification of GABA in microdialysis samples has been described in detail.13,24Briefly, dialysis samples were analyzed using an ESA HPLC system (Chelmsford, MA). Each dialysis sample (12.5 μl) was loaded into an autosampler, mixed with 6.0 μl derivatization solution (5.0 mm o -phthaldialdehyde, 1.8 mm β-mercaptoethanol, 97.1 mm borate buffer, 2.5% [vol/vol] methanol, pH 9.3) for 1 min and injected (10 μl) into a Shiseido CAPCELL PAK C-18 separation column (JM Science Inc., Grand Island, NY). Samples were carried through the system (0.6 μl/min) by a mobile phase consisting of 100 mm sodium phosphate buffer, 25% (vol/vol) methanol, and 3% (vol/vol) acetonitrile, pH 6.75. The potentials on the electrochemical detector were set at 750 mV for the 5020 guard cell and at 200 mV and 600 or 650 mV for channels 1 and 2 of the 5011A analytical cell, respectively. Automation of the HPLC system and analysis of GABA peaks were performed using EZChrom Elite chromatography data system (Scientific Software, Inc., Pleasanton, CA). Nine known concentrations of GABA were used to generate standard curves before and after each experiment. Standard curves were used to calculate the amount of GABA in each dialysis sample and to ensure that the sensitivity of the HPLC instrument did not change during the analysis.

The amount of GABA recovered by the dialysis probe in vitro  was calculated before and after each experiment by placing the dialysis probe in a vial containing a known concentration of GABA. Data from experiments in which probe recovery significantly changed in the same direction as the hypothesized change in brain GABA levels were eliminated from further analysis. Mean ± SD recovery for all the probes used in the current study was 7.5 ± 1.9%.

Polygraphic Recording and Objective Assessment of Postanesthesia Wakefulness

During the microdialysis experiments, a Grass Model 7D polygraph (Grass Instruments, Quincy, MA) was used to record the cortical electroencephalogram and neck muscle electromyogram. These physiologic signals were acquired and analyzed to assess arousal state using a Power CED1401 data acquisition board and Spike2 software (Cambridge Electronic Design, Cambridge, England). Electroencephalographic and electromyographic power were obtained using fast Fourier transform. Analyses were performed in 10-s epochs and in 1-Hz increments ranging from 0.5 to 60 Hz for electroencephalographic frequencies and from 10 to 75 Hz for electromyographic frequencies. The mean electroencephalographic power and mean electromyographic power were obtained by averaging 10-s epochs over a 20-min period during isoflurane anesthesia and during wakefulness.

Wakefulness is the most heterogeneous arousal state, and a sedative recovery scale developed for human patients25was modified to objectively score postanesthesia wakefulness. When isoflurane delivery was stopped, arousal state was scored as wakefulness when animals exhibited the following traits. (1) Eye appearance: bright eyes; eyelids and nictitating membranes spontaneously open or open in response to mild auditory-tactile stimulation; pupils accommodate; eyes exhibit purposeful and spontaneous movements. (2) Motor activity and coordination: presence of spontaneous limb movements; high neck muscle tone with periodic bursts of motor activity; ability to drink water. (3) Electroencephalogram: low-amplitude (< 50 μV), high-frequency (> 20 Hz) activity. (4) Breathing: deep and regular.

Intracranial Microinjections: Study Design and Procedures

Rats underwent implantation as previously described13,24with a guide cannula (Plastics One, Roanoke, VA) aimed 3 mm above the pontine reticular nucleus, oral part (anteroposterior: −8.4 mm from bregma, lateral: 1.0 mm, and height: −6.2 mm),26which is the rodent homologue of the pontine reticular formation. Recovery from surgery was followed by 1 week of conditioning to being handled and placed in the anesthesia chambers, after which time the microinjection experiments began. All microinjections were performed between 12:30 and 15:30 using a within-subjects design. In separate experiments, each rat received microinjections (100 nl) of Ringer's (vehicle control), the selective GABA uptake inhibitor nipecotic acid27–29(1.29 μg, 100 mm), and the selective GABA synthesis inhibitor 3-MPA28(1.06 μg, 100 mm). Rats received Ringer's and drug microinjections in varying order, and microinjections into the same rat were separated by 1 week. Fifteen minutes after microinjection, anesthesia was induced in an acrylic chamber prefilled with isoflurane. Delivered isoflurane concentrations were 1.5% (1.1 MAC30) for testing responses to nipecotic acid and 1% (0.7 MAC30) for testing responses to 3-MPA. Delivered isoflurane concentration and temperature in the anesthesia chamber (38°–39°C) were monitored continuously and held constant throughout the experiment. Time to loss of wakefulness (in minutes) was objectively evaluated by measuring loss of righting reflex.14Anesthesia was maintained for 30 min after loss of wakefulness. Breathing rate (in breaths/min) was assessed at 5, 15, and 25 min after the onset of anesthesia.

Histologic Localization of Microdialysis and Microinjection Sites

Microdialysis Sites.

After the last dialysis experiment, cats were deeply anesthetized with pentobarbital (35–40 mg/kg, intravenous) and perfused transcardially with cold saline (0.9%) followed by 10% formalin. Brains were removed and fixed in 10% formalin for 3–4 weeks. For cryoprotection, the brain stem block was transferred to 30% sucrose in 10% formalin for 7 days. Serial sagittal brain stem sections (40 μm thick) were cut on a sliding microtome, float mounted onto chrom-alum–coated glass slides, dried overnight, stained with cresyl violet, and coverslipped using Gel/Mount (Biomeda Corp., Foster City, CA). All sections containing microdialysis probe sites were digitized, and the stereotaxic coordinates of the dialysis sites were defined by comparison with a cat brain stem atlas.16 

Microinjection Sites.

After the final microinjection experiment, rats were deeply anesthetized with isoflurane and immediately decapitated. Brains were removed and frozen, and serial coronal brainstem sections were cut (40 μm) using a cryostat (Leica Microsystems, Nussloch, Germany). Sections corresponding to the pons were slide mounted and stained with cresyl violet for histologic confirmation of microinjection sites. All sections containing microinjection sites were digitized, and the stereotaxic coordinates were defined by comparison with a rat brain atlas.26 

Statistical Analyses

All data were tested for normality, and statistical tests were performed in consultation with the University of Michigan Center for Statistical Consultation and Research. Statistical analyses were performed using programs developed by Statistical Analysis System version 9.1.3 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC) and GBStat (Dynamic Microsystems, Inc., Silver Spring, MD). Data that met assumptions of the underlying general linear model were analyzed by inferential statistics and plotted as mean ± SD. Data for which normality was rejected were plotted to show median and interquartile range, and were analyzed using nonparametric statistics.

The effect of nipecotic acid on pontine reticular formation GABA levels was evaluated using nonparametric Friedman analysis of variance and Newman–Keuls post hoc  test. The stability of GABA levels during anesthesia and wakefulness after microdialysis probe insertion was assessed by linear regression analysis. Effects of isoflurane anesthesia on pontine reticular formation GABA levels, and electromyogram amplitude, were evaluated by nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test. Electroencephalographic power during anesthesia and wakefulness was quantitatively evaluated by t  test with Bonferroni correction. Drug effects on induction time and breathing rate were assessed by Wilcoxon matched pairs signed ranks test and paired t  test, respectively. A P  value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Chromatographic and In Vivo  Pharmacologic Confirmation of GABA in Cat Pontine Reticular Formation

Figures 1A and Bdemonstrate the ability to identify the chromatographic peak corresponding to GABA. Figure 1Apresents representative chromatograms produced by injecting five standardized concentrations of GABA (ranging from 0.011 to 0.913 pmol/10 μl) into the HPLC system. Only one set of peaks generated by the GABA standards systematically increased in area when increasing concentrations of GABA were injected. These peaks all showed the same retention time (15 min) and, when plotted as peak area versus  GABA concentration (inset), produced a linear standard curve. Note the absence of a peak at 15 min in the nondialyzed Ringer's sample (fig. 1A, gray trace labeled 0.000), which contained no GABA. Other peaks produced in the same chromatograms (indicated as a–d) revealed no correlation between peak area and concentration of GABA. In addition, peaks a–d also appeared after injection of nondialyzed Ringer's (0.000 pmol/10 μl GABA).

Fig. 1. γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) levels in cat pontine reticular formation are reliably quantified using  in vivo microdialysis and high-performance liquid chromatography. (  A ) Known amounts of GABA were used to create a standard curve for each microdialysis experiment.  Numbers to the right of each chromatogram indicate GABA concentration (pmol/10 μl). Peaks labeled,  a d did not increase with increasing concentrations of GABA. (  B ) The four traces show representative chromatograms obtained from nondialyzed Ringer's (  gray trace ), a GABA standard (0.228 pmol/10 μl;  blue trace ), and samples collected from the pontine reticular formation during  in vivo microdialysis with Ringer's (  orange trace ) and Ringer's containing nipecotic acid (  violet trace ). The increase in peak area produced by nipecotic acid confirmed the presence of GABA in cat pontine reticular formation. (  C ) GABA levels were significantly (*) increased (290%) during dialysis delivery of the GABA uptake inhibitor nipecotic acid (NPA) to the pontine reticular formation, providing additional confirmation that the peak at 15 min represents GABA. IQR = interquartile range. 

Fig. 1. γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) levels in cat pontine reticular formation are reliably quantified using  in vivo microdialysis and high-performance liquid chromatography. (  A ) Known amounts of GABA were used to create a standard curve for each microdialysis experiment.  Numbers to the right of each chromatogram indicate GABA concentration (pmol/10 μl). Peaks labeled,  a d did not increase with increasing concentrations of GABA. (  B ) The four traces show representative chromatograms obtained from nondialyzed Ringer's (  gray trace ), a GABA standard (0.228 pmol/10 μl;  blue trace ), and samples collected from the pontine reticular formation during  in vivo microdialysis with Ringer's (  orange trace ) and Ringer's containing nipecotic acid (  violet trace ). The increase in peak area produced by nipecotic acid confirmed the presence of GABA in cat pontine reticular formation. (  C ) GABA levels were significantly (*) increased (290%) during dialysis delivery of the GABA uptake inhibitor nipecotic acid (NPA) to the pontine reticular formation, providing additional confirmation that the peak at 15 min represents GABA. IQR = interquartile range. 

Close modal

The current study also used nipecotic acid to confirm the GABA peak in the chromatograms derived from brain samples. Dialysis administration of nipecotic acid, a GABA uptake inhibitor, selectively increases GABA levels in rat sriatum31and pontine reticular formation.24 Figure 1Bconfirms the presence of GABA in dialysis samples obtained from cat pontine reticular formation. First, there is a peak in the control biologic sample (dialyzed Ringer's, orange trace) with the same retention time (15 min) as the GABA standard (blue trace). Second, the size of this peak increased during dialysis administration of the GABA uptake inhibitor nipecotic acid (violet trace). Third, there is no peak with a 15-min retention time in the nondialyzed Ringer's sample (gray trace). Therefore, nipecotic acid delivery to the pontine reticular formation increased the peak area corresponding to GABA, confirming the presence of endogenous GABA in cat pontine reticular formation.

Figure 1Cplots median GABA levels during sequential dialysis with Ringer's (pre-NPA bar), Ringer's containing nipecotic acid (middle bar), and Ringer's (post-NPA bar). Friedman analysis of variance revealed a significant (P = 0.03) treatment effect on GABA levels. Newman–Keuls multiple comparisons test showed that nipecotic acid significantly (P < 0.05) increased GABA levels and that this increase was reversed after dialysis administration of nipecotic acid was discontinued. For all subsequent experiments, identification of GABA peaks in chromatograms from brain dialysis samples was based on the retention time of GABA standards, as shown in figure 1B.13,24 

Pontine Reticular Formation GABA Levels during Wakefulness and Isoflurane Anesthesia Were Not Confounded by the High GABA Levels Observed Immediately after Microdialysis Probe Insertion

This study next sought to determine the time needed to achieve stable GABA levels after placement of a microdialysis probe in the pontine reticular formation.32,33,Figure 2Aplots the time course of pontine reticular formation GABA levels after dialysis probe insertion into cat pontine reticular formation during anesthesia. The graph shows the characteristically high initial GABA levels, followed by a slow decay until stability was achieved. Regression analysis34was used to objectively identify when the decline in GABA levels ended. Therefore, the goal of these methodologic experiments was to determine when the slope of the regression line was no longer changing. Figure 2Ademonstrates that the slope of the linear regression function for the last 10 samples collected during anesthesia (minutes 125–170) was not significantly different from zero. Therefore, stability of GABA levels was confirmed after 125 min of dialysis, and the last 10 samples provided stable, control GABA levels during anesthesia. Figure 2Billustrates GABA levels in the pontine reticular formation obtained during spontaneous wakefulness. Regression analysis demonstrated that GABA levels during wakefulness were stable after 125 min of dialysis, similar to findings in anesthetized cats (fig. 2A) and consistent with previous studies in rats.35,36 

Fig. 2. Time course for achieving stable γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) levels in cat pontine reticular formation. (  A ) Regression analysis (  horizontal line ) demonstrated that stability of GABA levels was achieved after 125 min of dialysis. The  inset shows a schematic sagittal view of the cat brain with a microdialysis probe placed in the pontine reticular formation. (  B ) Regression analysis (  horizontal line ) indicated that GABA levels in 10 sequential samples collected during wakefulness were stable between 125 and 170 min of dialysis. 

Fig. 2. Time course for achieving stable γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) levels in cat pontine reticular formation. (  A ) Regression analysis (  horizontal line ) demonstrated that stability of GABA levels was achieved after 125 min of dialysis. The  inset shows a schematic sagittal view of the cat brain with a microdialysis probe placed in the pontine reticular formation. (  B ) Regression analysis (  horizontal line ) indicated that GABA levels in 10 sequential samples collected during wakefulness were stable between 125 and 170 min of dialysis. 

Close modal

Isoflurane Decreased Pontine Reticular Formation GABA Levels, Increased Cortical Electroencephalographic Power, and Decreased Neck Muscle Tone

Figure 3summarizes three traits that characterized the state of isoflurane anesthesia. For data shown in figures 3A, C, and E, sample collection started during wakefulness and continued during anesthesia. For the data reported in figures 3B, D, and F, samples were collected during anesthesia followed by postanesthesia wakefulness. Figures 3A and Bplot median GABA levels in the pontine reticular formation during states of anesthesia and wakefulness. Relative to wakefulness, GABA levels were significantly decreased by clinically relevant concentrations of isoflurane (2.1–2.2%, 1.1–1.2 MAC23). GABA levels were significantly decreased whether isoflurane administration followed (fig. 3A) or preceded (fig. 3B) wakefulness. Figure 3Cshows that compared with spontaneous wakefulness, frontal cortex electroencephalographic power was significantly increased during isoflurane anesthesia in all bands except 30–60 Hz. Significant increases in electroencephalographic power were also observed during isoflurane anesthesia compared with postanesthesia wakefulness (fig. 3D). Figures 3E and Fshow that neck muscle electromyographic power was significantly reduced by isoflurane.

Fig. 3. γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) levels, electroencephalographic (EEG) power, and neck electromyographic (EMG) power during wakefulness and anesthesia. GABA levels were decreased by isoflurane (  A and  B ): Isoflurane significantly (*  P < 0.001, Mann–Whitney U test) decreased GABA levels when administered after wakefulness (  A  ). GABA levels also were significantly (*  P < 0.02, Mann–Whitney U test) decreased relative to wakefulness when isoflurane delivery preceded wakefulness (  B ). Electroencephalographic power was increased by isoflurane (  C and  D ): Compared with spontaneous wakefulness (  C ) or postanesthesia wakefulness (  D ), power of the frontal cortex electroencephalogram in the 0.5- to 4-Hz (delta), 5- to 8-Hz (theta), and 11- to 29-Hz (sigma and beta) bands was significantly (*  P < 0.01,  t test with Bonferroni correction) increased during isoflurane anesthesia. Neck muscle tone was decreased by isoflurane (  E and  F ): Expressed as percent of electromyographic power during wakefulness, neck muscle activity was significantly (*  P < 0.001) reduced by isoflurane when anesthesia followed (  E ) or preceded (  F ) wakefulness. 

Fig. 3. γ-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) levels, electroencephalographic (EEG) power, and neck electromyographic (EMG) power during wakefulness and anesthesia. GABA levels were decreased by isoflurane (  A and  B ): Isoflurane significantly (*  P < 0.001, Mann–Whitney U test) decreased GABA levels when administered after wakefulness (  A  ). GABA levels also were significantly (*  P < 0.02, Mann–Whitney U test) decreased relative to wakefulness when isoflurane delivery preceded wakefulness (  B ). Electroencephalographic power was increased by isoflurane (  C and  D ): Compared with spontaneous wakefulness (  C ) or postanesthesia wakefulness (  D ), power of the frontal cortex electroencephalogram in the 0.5- to 4-Hz (delta), 5- to 8-Hz (theta), and 11- to 29-Hz (sigma and beta) bands was significantly (*  P < 0.01,  t test with Bonferroni correction) increased during isoflurane anesthesia. Neck muscle tone was decreased by isoflurane (  E and  F ): Expressed as percent of electromyographic power during wakefulness, neck muscle activity was significantly (*  P < 0.001) reduced by isoflurane when anesthesia followed (  E ) or preceded (  F ) wakefulness. 

Close modal

Isoflurane Induction Time Was Decreased by a GABA Synthesis Inhibitor and Increased by a GABA Uptake Blocker Administered to the Pontine Reticular Formation

Figure 4Ashows that microinjection of the GABA synthesis inhibitor 3-MPA into rat pontine reticular formation significantly decreased isoflurane induction time. Consistent with the effect of 3-MPA, pontine reticular formation administration of the GABA uptake inhibitor nipecotic acid caused a significant increase in isoflurane induction time (fig. 4B). Figures 4C and Dillustrate the effects of 3-MPA and nipecotic acid on rate of breathing. Relative to control (Ringer's), nipecotic acid significantly increased breathing rate during anesthesia (fig. 3D).

Fig. 4. Pontine reticular formation microinjection of drugs that alter γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) levels significantly changed isoflurane induction time and breathing rate. (  A ) The GABA synthesis inhibitor 3-mercaptopropionic acid (3-MPA) significantly (*  P < 0.02) decreased time to loss of righting response (LoRR). (  B ) Pontine reticular formation microinjection of the GABA uptake inhibitor nipecotic acid (NPA) significantly (*  P < 0.01) increased the amount of time required for isoflurane to cause a loss of the righting response. (  C ) Rate of breathing was not significantly altered by 3-MPA. (  D ) Nipecotic acid significantly (*  P < 0.002) increased rate of breathing. 

Fig. 4. Pontine reticular formation microinjection of drugs that alter γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) levels significantly changed isoflurane induction time and breathing rate. (  A ) The GABA synthesis inhibitor 3-mercaptopropionic acid (3-MPA) significantly (*  P < 0.02) decreased time to loss of righting response (LoRR). (  B ) Pontine reticular formation microinjection of the GABA uptake inhibitor nipecotic acid (NPA) significantly (*  P < 0.01) increased the amount of time required for isoflurane to cause a loss of the righting response. (  C ) Rate of breathing was not significantly altered by 3-MPA. (  D ) Nipecotic acid significantly (*  P < 0.002) increased rate of breathing. 

Close modal

Deconstructing the state of isoflurane anesthesia into component traits led to four novel findings. First, GABA levels in cat pontine reticular formation were decreased by isoflurane. Second, the traits of increased cortical electroencephalographic power and decreased skeletal muscle tone induced by isoflurane covaried with pontine reticular formation GABA levels. Third, the time to loss of righting reflex in response to isoflurane was decreased by a GABA synthesis inhibitor and increased by a GABA uptake inhibitor when these drugs were microinjected directly into the pontine reticular formation. Fourth, the rate of breathing during isoflurane anesthesia was increased by pontine reticular formation administration of a GABA uptake blocker. These results suggest that one mechanism by which isoflurane causes the traits of loss of wakefulness, altered cortical excitability, diminished muscle tone, and decreased breathing rate is by reducing GABA levels in the pontine reticular formation.

GABAergic Transmission in the Pontine Reticular Formation Promotes Wakefulness

Several studies performed in the context of sleep neurobiology suggest that GABAergic neurotransmission13at GABAAreceptors in the pontine reticular formation9–11promotes wakefulness. The concept of a wakefulness-promoting role for pontine reticular formation GABA is also supported by the finding that GABA levels in the pontine reticular formation are decreased during the loss of wakefulness caused by isoflurane (fig. 3), and by the data showing that pontine reticular formation administration of drugs that decrease or increase GABA levels decrease or increase, respectively, the time need for isoflurane to cause a loss of wakefulness (fig. 4).

The mechanisms by which GABA in the pontine reticular formation promotes wakefulness remain to be elucidated. GABA originating in the basal forebrain causes cortical excitation by inhibiting cortical GABAergic interneurons, resulting in disinhibition.37A similar mechanism may operate in the pontine reticular formation. The recent finding that GABA is directly excitatory to a subpopulation of neurons in the adult suprachiasmatic nucleus38indicates the need for synaptic-level studies in the pontine reticular formation. The current data do not address the role of pontine reticular formation GABA receptor subtypes mediating the isoflurane-induced loss of wakefulness. The results reported here encourage additional pharmacologic studies using GABA receptor subtype–selective agonists and antagonists to determine the extent to which the isoflurane-induced loss of wakefulness is mediated by GABAAand/or GABABreceptors in the pontine reticular formation.

The functional significance of the finding that GABA levels in the pontine reticular formation decrease during isoflurane anesthesia is illustrated by the fact that isoflurane does not homogenously decrease GABA levels throughout the brain. Dong et al.  35showed that isoflurane anesthesia caused a significant decrease in GABA levels in the cortex and basal forebrain, and no change in GABA levels in the posterior hypothalamus. Moreover, these authors35also demonstrated that isoflurane anesthesia caused an increase in glutamate levels in the cortex and basal forebrain, but no change in hypothalamic glutamate levels. These data showing brain region–specific changes in neurotransmitter levels induced by isoflurane,35together with the current results demonstrating that drugs known to alter GABA levels change isoflurane induction time (fig. 4), support the interpretation that decreases in pontine reticular formation GABA levels causally contribute to the loss of wakefulness.

Cortical Excitability and Muscle Tone Characteristic of Isoflurane Anesthesia Covary with GABA Levels in the Pontine Reticular Formation

Diverse molecular and cellular targets, including multiple neurotransmitter systems in different brain regions, are involved in generating the neurobehavioral effects of general anesthetics.14,15,39,40The fact that different brain regions regulate different neurobehavioral functions means that insights into the mechanisms of anesthetic action can be achieved by deconstructing anesthetic states into their component traits.3,41,42The current study applied this deconstruction approach by relating measures of pontine reticular formation GABA to the traits of cortical electroencephalogram and muscle hypotonia (fig. 3). Wakefulness preceding anesthesia was characterized by greater GABA levels, lower electroencephalographic power, and greater muscle tone. When anesthesia preceded wakefulness, the relation between all three measures was reversed such that GABA levels and electromyographic power were increased and electroencephalographic power was decreased during wakefulness. Therefore, the figure 3data show that GABA levels in the pontine reticular formation vary consistently with physiologic traits known to define the state of isoflurane anesthesia. The isoflurane-induced increase in electroencephalographic power agrees with human data demonstrating that increases in electroencephalographic power caused by propofol and sevoflurane are associated with anesthetically induced loss of arousal.43 

Supraspinal Modulation of Immobility by GABA

The spinal cord is recognized as one site of action for anesthetic-induced immobility, and it is also appreciated that supraspinal sites contribute to motor hypotonia and immobility.44Motor control is hierarchically organized in the central nervous system, and considerable data demonstrate that the pontine reticular formation plays a major role in the supraspinal regulation of motor tone. During the progression from wakefulness to non-REM sleep and REM sleep, somatic motor tone decreases. The hypotonia and immobility that occur during the loss of wakefulness are known to be regulated by descending projections arising from the same pontine reticular formation areas from which the GABA measures were obtained in the current study. The activity of these descending projections is modulated by multiple neurotransmitter systems in the pontine reticular formation.45–49The current results support the interpretation that GABAergic transmission in the pontine reticular formation contributes to isoflurane-induced muscular hypotonia (figs. 3E and F) and immobility (figs. 4A and B). These are new findings that contribute to understanding the mechanisms by which isoflurane causes the trait of immobility.

Manipulating GABA Synthesis and Uptake Altered the Loss of Righting Response and Rate of Breathing

The results indicating a faithful relation between pontine reticular formation GABA levels, cortical excitability, and muscle tone (fig. 3) are limited by their correlational nature. This limitation was addressed by experiments designed to determine whether microinjecting the pontine reticular formation with a GABA synthesis inhibitor and a GABA uptake blocker caused changes in isoflurane induction time. Rather than using only a global assessment of anesthetic state, these experiments quantified two anesthetic traits (fig. 4). The first trait, loss of consciousness, is reliably assessed in preclinical studies by measuring time to loss of righting response.50,51The second trait quantified was rate of breathing. The GABA synthesis inhibitor 3-MPA significantly decreased the time to loss of righting caused by isoflurane. The 3-MPA results are consistent with previous data showing that pontine reticular formation microinjection of 3-MPA in the awake rat increases sleep.13The present respiratory measures indicate that 3-MPA had no effect on rate of breathing during isoflurane anesthesia. The lack of effect on breathing rate by 3-MPA may reflect a “floor effect” caused by the rapid and powerful depressant action of isoflurane on respiratory rate. The selective GABA uptake inhibitor nipecotic acid increased the time needed for isoflurane to cause a loss of wakefulness. Compared with control, nipecotic acid significantly increased rate of breathing during anesthesia, consistent with Fink's52concept of a “wakefulness stimulus for breathing.” Together, these data permit the inference that levels of GABA in the pontine reticular formation causally contribute to the regulation of traits characterizing isoflurane anesthesia.

Measures of GABA in the Pontine Reticular Formation Are Valid, Stable, and Functionally Significant

Brain GABA levels are relatively low compared with other amino acid neurotransmitters,27and it is important to unambiguously identify the chromatographic peak corresponding to GABA. The current study used three methods to confirm that the peak in the chromatograms (fig. 1) represents GABA. First, in the chromatograms generated by GABA standards, only the peak with a retention time of 15 min systematically increased in area with increasing concentrations of GABA. Second, the Ringer's solution used for standards and for brain dialysis did not contain a peak with a 15-min retention time. Third, microdialysis delivery of nipecotic acid, which selectively blocks GABA uptake, caused a significant increase in GABA, thus confirming the presence of pontine reticular formation GABA.13,24Considered together, the three approaches illustrated by figure 1demonstrate reliable and functionally significant measurement of GABA in cat pontine reticular formation.

A second gap in knowledge addressed by the current results concerns the fact that no previous data existed quantifying the amount of time required for GABA levels to stabilize after microdialysis probe placement in cat pontine reticular formation. Previous in vivo  microdialysis studies measuring GABA levels in cat dorsal raphe nucleus and locus coeruleus did not quantify stabilization time, but reported that a minimum of 17 h followed probe insertion into the brain before onset of dialysis sample collection.53,54GABA levels are well known to be high immediately after probe insertion, and to decline and then stabilize with time.32,33In the absence of the figure 2data quantifying GABA stabilization time in the pontine reticular formation, it is not possible to attribute changes in GABA to isoflurane anesthesia. Time course studies (fig. 2) conducted during anesthesia and during wakefulness demonstrate that initially high GABA levels decrease and become stable 2 h after dialysis probe insertion. Interestingly, in the pontine reticular formation of halothane-anesthetized rats, less time (42 min) was required to achieve stable GABA levels.13The reasons for these different stabilization times are unknown but may be due to the use of different dialysis probe membranes and flow rates, species, or inhalation anesthetics. Comparison of these two studies further emphasizes the necessity of empirically demonstrating the time course for achieving stable GABA levels.

The origin of extracellular GABA levels is complex (reviewed in Watson et al.  24,33and Westerink et al.  55), and this complexity restricts the ability of the current study to identify the sources of GABA in the pontine reticular formation. Synaptic GABA mediates transient, postsynaptic inhibitory currents (phasic inhibition), whereas extrasynaptic GABA released from neurons and glia produces a persistent tonic inhibition.56In addition to postsynaptic GABA receptors, extrasynaptic GABAAreceptors are highly expressed in many brain regions, including those involved in generating sleep, and extrasynaptic GABAAreceptors are likely targets for sedative–hypnotic and anesthetic drugs.40,57–61The current report is conservative in referring to GABA levels rather than GABA release because the cellular sources of GABA are unidentified.

Conclusion and Interpretation

The current results support the conclusion that directly or indirectly decreasing GABA levels in the pontine reticular formation comprises one mechanism by which isoflurane causes loss of consciousness, altered cortical excitability, muscular hypotonia, and decreased respiratory rate. Figure 5provides a schematic model that interprets the current findings regarding traits of isoflurane anesthesia relative to mechanisms regulating GABA levels. Compared with levels of GABA during wakefulness (fig. 5A), isoflurane caused a decrease in pontine reticular formation GABA levels (fig. 5B). The finding that microinjecting 3-MPA into the pontine reticular formation shortened the time required for isoflurane to cause loss of righting reflex (fig. 4A) fits with the interpretation that 3-MPA decreases GABA levels in the pontine reticular formation by inhibiting glutamic acid decarboxylase, resulting in decreased GABA synthesis (fig. 5C). This finding is also consistent with data showing that microinjecting 3-MPA into rat pontine reticular formation decreases wakefulness and increases sleep.13Previous studies demonstrated that microinjecting the GABA uptake inhibitor nipecotic acid into the pontine reticular formation of intact, unanesthetized rat increases wakefulness.13Therefore, the current data showing that nipecotic acid administered to the pontine reticular formation significantly increased time required for isoflurane to cause loss of righting (fig. 4B) and increased rate of breathing (fig. 4D) are consistent with an increase in GABA (fig. 1C) resulting from GABA transporter blockade (fig. 5D).

Fig. 5. Schematic illustrating mechanisms of action of isoflurane, 3-mercaptopropionic acid (3-MPA), and nipecotic acid (NPA) within the pontine reticular formation. (  A ) During wakefulness, pontine reticular formation γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA;  red dots ) is released from vesicles contained in presynaptic terminals, increasing chloride ion (Cl) conductance by activation of postsynaptic and extrasynaptic GABAAreceptors. GABA is then actively removed from the synaptic cleft by uptake mechanisms (GABA transporters). (  B ) Isoflurane decreases pontine reticular formation GABA levels, in part, by inhibiting action potential dependent neurotransmitter release,  62,by potentiation of GABAAreceptor–mediated inhibition of GABAergic neurons,  15,and/or by presynaptic inhibition (disfacilitation) of excitatory inputs acting on GABAergic neurons.  35,These three actions of isoflurane on GABAergic transmission likely occur in combinations that vary as a function of brain region. (  C ) Inhibition of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) by 3-MPA decreases GABA levels in the pontine reticular formation, decreases arousal, and facilitates isoflurane-induced loss of wakefulness. (  D ) Inhibition of pontine reticular formation GABA uptake mechanisms by NPA increases GABA levels, increases arousal, and prolongs isoflurane induction time.  A D include extrasynaptic GABA receptors because these receptors are targets for anesthetic drugs  61,and because GABA measured by  in vivo microdialysis is thought to act at these extrasynaptic receptors .33 

Fig. 5. Schematic illustrating mechanisms of action of isoflurane, 3-mercaptopropionic acid (3-MPA), and nipecotic acid (NPA) within the pontine reticular formation. (  A ) During wakefulness, pontine reticular formation γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA;  red dots ) is released from vesicles contained in presynaptic terminals, increasing chloride ion (Cl) conductance by activation of postsynaptic and extrasynaptic GABAAreceptors. GABA is then actively removed from the synaptic cleft by uptake mechanisms (GABA transporters). (  B ) Isoflurane decreases pontine reticular formation GABA levels, in part, by inhibiting action potential dependent neurotransmitter release,  62,by potentiation of GABAAreceptor–mediated inhibition of GABAergic neurons,  15,and/or by presynaptic inhibition (disfacilitation) of excitatory inputs acting on GABAergic neurons.  35,These three actions of isoflurane on GABAergic transmission likely occur in combinations that vary as a function of brain region. (  C ) Inhibition of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) by 3-MPA decreases GABA levels in the pontine reticular formation, decreases arousal, and facilitates isoflurane-induced loss of wakefulness. (  D ) Inhibition of pontine reticular formation GABA uptake mechanisms by NPA increases GABA levels, increases arousal, and prolongs isoflurane induction time.  A D include extrasynaptic GABA receptors because these receptors are targets for anesthetic drugs  61,and because GABA measured by  in vivo microdialysis is thought to act at these extrasynaptic receptors .33 

Close modal

For expert assistance, the authors thank Lindsay A. Bouchard, B.S. (Research Assistant), Sha Jiang, B.S. (Research Associate), Mary A. Norat, B.S. (Senior Research Associate), Haideliza Soto-Calderon, B.S. (Research Assistant), and Bradley L. Wathen, M.S. (Research Assistant), from the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Kathleen B. Welch, M.S., M.P.H. (Statistician Staff Specialist, Center for Statistical Consultation and Research, University of Michigan), provided input on statistical analyses.

1.
Moruzzi G, Magoun HW: Brain stem reticular formation and activation of the EEG. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1949; 1:455–73
2.
Steriade M, McCarley RW: Brain Control of Wakefulness and Sleep. New York, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press, 2005
New York
,
Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press
3.
Lydic R, Baghdoyan HA: Sleep, anesthesiology, and the neurobiology of arousal state control. Anesthesiology 2005; 103:1268–95
4.
de la Roza C, Reinoso-Suarez F: GABAergic structures in the ventral part of the oral pontine reticular nucleus: An ultrastructural immunogold analysis. Neuroscience 2006; 142:1183–93
5.
Rodrigo-Angulo ML, Heredero S, Rodriguez-Veiga E, Reinoso-Suarez F: GABAergic and non-GABAergic thalamic, hypothalamic and basal forebrain projections to the ventral oral pontine reticular nucleus: Their implication in REM sleep modulation. Brain Res 2008; 1210:116–25
6.
Mohler H: GABAAreceptor diversity and pharmacology. Cell Tissue Res 2006; 326:505–16
7.
Nutt D: GABAAreceptors: Subtypes, regional distribution, and function. J Clin Sleep Med 2006; 2:S7–11
8.
Pirker S, Schwarzer C, Wieselthaler A, Sieghart W, Sperk G: GABAAreceptors: Immunocytochemical distribution of 13 subunits in the adult rat brain. Neuroscience 2000; 101:815–50
9.
Camacho-Arroyo I, Alvarado R, Manjarrez J, Tapia R: Microinjections of muscimol and bicuculline into the pontine reticular formation modify the sleep-waking cycle in the rat. Neurosci Lett 1991; 129:95–7
10.
Xi MC, Morales FR, Chase MH: Evidence that wakefulness and REM sleep are controlled by a GABAergic pontine mechanism. J Neurophysiol 1999; 82:2015–9
11.
Sanford LD, Tang X, Xiao J, Ross RJ, Morrison AR: GABAergic regulation of REM sleep in reticularis pontis oralis and caudalis in rats. J Neurophysiol 2003; 90:938–45
12.
Vazquez J, Baghdoyan HA: GABAAreceptors inhibit acetylcholine release in cat pontine reticular formation: Implications for REM sleep regulation. J Neurophysiol 2004; 92:2198–206
13.
Watson CJ, Soto-Calderon H, Lydic R, Baghdoyan HA: Pontine reticular formation (PnO) administration of hypocretin-1 increases PnO GABA levels and wakefulness. Sleep 2008; 31:453–64
14.
Franks NP: General anaesthesia: From molecular targets to neuronal pathways of sleep and arousal. Nat Rev Neurosci 2008; 9:370–86
15.
Mashour GA, Forman SA, Campagna JA: Mechanisms of general anesthesia: From molecules to mind. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 2005; 19:349–64
16.
Berman AL: The Brain Stem of the Cat: A Cytoarchitectonic Atlas with Stereotaxic Coordinates. Madison, University of Wisconsin, 1968
Madison
,
University of Wisconsin
17.
Keifer JC, Baghdoyan HA, Becker L, Lydic R: Halothane decreases pontine acetylcholine release and increases EEG spindles. Neuroreport 1994; 5:577–80
18.
Keifer JC, Baghdoyan HA, Lydic R: Pontine cholinergic mechanisms modulate the cortical electroencephalographic spindles of halothane anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1996; 84:945–54
19.
Lydic R, Baghdoyan HA: Ketamine and MK-801 decrease acetylcholine release in the pontine reticular formation, slow breathing, and disrupt sleep. Sleep 2002; 25:617–22
20.
Lydic R, Keifer JC, Baghdoyan HA, Becker L: Microdialysis of the pontine reticular formation reveals inhibition of acetylcholine release by morphine. Anesthesiology 1993; 79:1003–12
21.
Mortazavi S, Thompson J, Baghdoyan HA, Lydic R: Fentanyl and morphine, but not remifentanil, inhibit acetylcholine release in pontine regions modulating arousal. Anesthesiology 1999; 90:1070–7
22.
Ursin R, Sterman M: Manual for Standardized Scoring of Sleep and Waking States in Adult Cats. Los Angeles, BIS/BRI, University of California, 1981
Los Angeles, BIS/BRI
,
University of California
23.
Barter LS, Ilkiw JE, Steffey EP, Pypendop BH, Imai A: Animal dependence of inhaled anaesthetic requirements in cats. Br J Anaesth 2004; 92:275–7
24.
Watson CJ, Lydic R, Baghdoyan HA: Sleep and GABA levels in the oral part of rat pontine reticular formation are decreased by local and systemic administration of morphine. Neuroscience 2007; 144:375–86
25.
Macnab AJ, Levine M, Glick N, Phillips N, Susak L, Elliott M: The Vancouver sedative recovery scale for children: Validation and reliability of scoring based on videotaped instruction. Can J Anaesth 1994; 41:913–8
26.
Paxinos G, Watson C: The Rat Brain, 6th edition. Burlington, MA, Academic Press, 2007
Burlington, MA
,
Academic Press
27.
Boyd BW, Witowski SR, Kennedy RT: Trace-level amino acid analysis by capillary liquid chromatography and application to in vivo  microdialysis sampling with 10-s temporal resolution. Anal Chem 2000; 72:865–71
28.
Krogsgaard-Larsen P, Frolund B, Frydenvang K: GABA uptake inhibitors: Design, molecular pharmacology, and therapeutic aspects. Curr Pharm Des 2000; 6:1193–209
29.
Juhász G, Kékesi KA, Nyitrai G, Dobolyi A, Krogsgaard-Larsen P, Schousboe A: Differential effects of nipecotic acid and 4,5,6-7 tetrahydroisoxazolo[4,5-c ]pyridin-3-ol on extracellular γ-aminobutyrate levels in rat thalamus. Eur J Pharmacol 1997; 331:139–44
30.
White PF, Johnston RR, Eger EI: Determination of anesthetic requirement in rats. Anesthesiology 1974; 40:52–7
31.
Kehr J, Ungerstedt U: Fast HPLC estimation of gamma-aminobutyric acid in microdialysis perfusates: Effect of nipecotic and 3-mercaptopropionic acids. J Neurochem 1988; 51:1308–10
32.
Benveniste H, Huttemeier PC: Microdialysis: Theory and application. Prog Neurobiol 1990; 35:195–215
33.
Watson CJ, Venton BJ, Kennedy RT: In vivo  measurements of neurotransmitters using microdialysis sampling. Anal Chem 2006; 78:1391–9
34.
Osman NI, Baghdoyan HA, Lydic R: Morphine inhibits acetylcholine release in rat prefrontal cortex when delivered systemically or by microdialysis to basal forebrain. Anesthesiology 2005; 103:779–87
35.
Dong HL, Fukuda S, Murata E, Higuchi T: Excitatory and inhibitory actions of isoflurane on the cholinergic ascending arousal system of the rat. Anesthesiology 2006; 104:122–33
36.
Smith A, Watson CJ, Frantz KJ, Eppler B, Kennedy RT, Peris J: Differential increase in taurine levels by low-dose ethanol in the dorsal and ventral striatum revealed by microdialysis with on-line capillary electrophoresis. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2004; 28:1028–38
37.
Zaborszky L, Duque A: Local synaptic connections of basal forebrain neurons. Behav Brain Res 2000; 115:143–58
38.
Choi HJ, Lee CJ, Scroeder A, Kim YS, Jung SH, Kim JS, Kim DY, Son EJ, Han HC, Hong SK, Colwell CS, Kim YI: Excitatory actions of GABA in the suprachiasmatic nucleus. J Neurosci 2008; 28:5450–9
39.
Grasshoff C, Drexler B, Rudolph U, Antkowiak B: Anaesthetic drugs: Linking molecular actions to clinical effects. Curr Pharm Des 2006; 12:3665–79
40.
Hemmings HC Jr, Akabas MH, Goldstein PA, Trudell JR, Orser BA, Harrison NL: Emerging molecular mechanisms of general anesthetic action. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2005; 26:503–10
41.
Lydic R, Biebuyck JF: Sleep neurobiology: Relevance for mechanistic studies of anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1994; 72:506–8
42.
Van Dort CJ, Baghdoyan HA, Lydic R: Neurochemical modulators of sleep and anesthetic states. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2008; 46:1–30
43.
Gugino LD, Chabot RJ, Prichep LS, John ER, Formanek V, Aglio LS: Quantitative EEG changes associated with loss and return of consciousness in healthy adult volunteers anaesthetized with propofol or sevoflurane. Br J Anaesth 2001; 87:421–8
44.
Antognini JF, Carstens E: Neural Mechanisms of Anesthesia. New Jersey, Humana Press, 2003
New Jersey
,
Humana Press
45.
Baghdoyan HA, Lydic R, Callaway CW, Hobson JA: The carbachol-induced enhancement of desynchronized sleep signs is dose dependent and antagonized by centrally administered atropine. Neuropsychopharmacology 1989; 2:67–79
46.
Lai YY, Siegel JM: Pontomedullary glutamate receptors mediating locomotion and muscle tone suppression. J Neurosci 1991; 11:2931–7
47.
Morales FR, Engelhardt JK, Soja PJ, Pereda AE, Chase MH: Motoneuron properties during motor inhibition produced by microinjection of carbachol into the pontine reticular formation of the decerebrate cat. J Neurophysiol 1987; 57:1118–29
48.
Xi MC, Morales FR, Chase MH: The motor inhibitory system operating during active sleep is tonically suppressed by GABAergic mechanisms during other states. J Neurophysiol 2001; 86:1908–15
49.
Wills N, Chase MH: Brain stem control of masseteric reflex activity during sleep and wakefulness: Mesencephalon and pons. Exp Neurol 1979; 64:98–117
50.
Tung A, Szafran MJ, Bluhm B, Mendelson WB: Sleep deprivation potentiates the onset and duration of loss of righting reflex induced by propofol and isoflurane. Anesthesiology 2002; 97:906–11
51.
Alkire MT, McReynolds JR, Hahn EL, Trivedi AN: Thalamic microinjection of nicotine reverses sevoflurane-induced loss of righting reflex in the rat. Anesthesiology 2007; 107:264–72
52.
Fink BR: Influence of cerebral activity in wakefulness on regulation of breathing. J Appl Physiol 1961; 16:15–20
53.
Nitz D, Siegel J: GABA release in the dorsal raphe nucleus: Role in the control of REM sleep. Am J Physiol 1997; 273:R451–5
54.
Nitz D, Siegel JM: GABA release in the locus coeruleus as a function of sleep/wake state. Neuroscience 1997; 78:795–801
55.
Westerink BHC, Rea K, Oldenziel WH, Cremers TIFH: Microdialysis of glutamate and GABA in the brain: analysis and interpretation, Handbook of Microdialysis. Edited by Westerink BHC, Cremers TIFH. The Netherlands, Elsevier, 2007, pp 17–31Westerink BHC, Cremers TIFH
The Netherlands
,
Elsevier
56.
Farrant M, Nusser Z: Variations on an inhibitory theme: Phasic and tonic activation of GABAAreceptors. Nat Rev Neurosci 2005; 6:215–29
57.
Belelli D, Peden DR, Rosahl TW, Wafford KA, Lambert JJ: Extrasynaptic GABAAreceptors of thalamocortical neurons: A molecular target for hypnotics. J Neurosci 2005; 25:11513–20
58.
Chandra D, Jia F, Liang J, Peng Z, Suryanarayanan A, Werner DF, Spigelman I, Houser CR, Olsen RW, Harrison NL, Homanics GE: GABAAreceptor alpha 4 subunits mediate extrasynaptic inhibition in thalamus and dentate gyrus and the action of gaboxadol. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103: 15230–5
59.
Jia F, Pignataro L, Schofield CM, Yue M, Harrison NL, Goldstein PA: An extrasynaptic GABAAreceptor mediates tonic inhibition in thalamic VB neurons. J Neurophysiol 2005; 94:4491–501
60.
Jia F, Yue M, Chandra D, Homanics GE, Goldstein PA, Harrison NL: Isoflurane is a potent modulator of extrasynaptic GABAAreceptors in the thalamus. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2008; 324:1127–35
61.
Orser BA: Extrasynaptic GABAAreceptors are critical targets for sedative-hypnotic drugs. J Clin Sleep Med 2006; 2:S12–8
62.
Hemmings HC Jr, Yan W, Westphalen RI, Ryan TA: The general anesthetic isoflurane depresses synaptic vesicle exocytosis. Mol Pharmacol 2005; 67:1591–9