Recent studies have demonstrated that volatile general anesthetic agents such as halothane and isoflurane may bind to discrete sites on protein targets. In the case of bovine serum albumin, the sites of halothane and chloroform binding have been identified as being located in the IB and IIA subdomains. This structural information provides a foundation for more detailed studies into the potential mechanisms of anesthetic action.


The effect of halothane and isoflurane and the nonimmobilizer 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane on the mobility of the indole ring in the tryptophan residues of albumin was investigated using measurements of fluorescence anisotropy. Myoglobin served as a negative control. In addition, the effect of bound anesthetic agents on global protein stability was determined by thermal denaturation experiments using near-ultraviolet circular dichroism spectroscopy.


The fluorescence anisotropy measurements showed that halothane and isoflurane decreased the mobility of the indole rings in a concentration-dependent manner. The calculated dissociation constants were 1.6+/-0.4 and 1.3+/-0.3 mM for isoflurane and halothane, respectively. In contrast, both agents failed to increase the fluorescence anisotropy of the tryptophan residues in myoglobin, compatible with lack of binding. The nonimmobilizer 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane caused no change in the fluorescence anisotropy of albumin. Binding of the anesthetic agents stabilized the native folded form of albumin to thermal denaturation. Analysis of the thermal denaturation data yielded dissociation constant values of 0.98+/-0.10 mM for isoflurane and 1.0+/-0.1 mM for halothane.


Attenuation of local side-chain dynamics and stabilization of folded protein conformations may represent fundamental modes of action of volatile general anesthetic agents. Because protein activity is crucially dependent on inherent flexibility, anesthetic-induced stabilization of certain protein conformations may explain how these important clinical agents change protein function.

THE molecular mechanisms of volatile general anesthetic action remain to be defined. [1]A major obstacle has been the lack of structural information on anesthetic-protein complexes. This is related, in part, to the fact that the in vivo sites of action are unknown, although a growing body of evidence implicates the [small gamma, Greek]-aminobutyric acid A and N-methyl-D-aspartate glutamate receptor complexes as playing important roles. [2,3]Further, the unique pharmacology of these agents, characterized by relatively weak binding energetics-translating into rapid dissociation from the binding site, has prevented the use of traditional radioligand approaches to defining binding sites on proteins. In recent years, techniques based on (19) F-nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, [4]photoaffinity labeling, [5]and fluorescence spectroscopy, [6]which directly monitor the binding of volatile general anesthetic agents to protein targets, have become available. These direct binding studies have set the stage for more detailed biophysical analyses of anesthetic effects on proteins, potentially providing insight into mechanisms of anesthetic action.

Investigations on the mammalian protein bovine serum albumin (BSA), used as a model system, indicate that volatile general anesthetic agents bind to subdomains IB and IIA in close proximity to the two tryptophan residues Trp134 and Trp212. [6-8]Albumin is composed of three homologous domains (I, II, and III), each of which is divided into three subdomains (A, B, and C) for purposes of discussing the location of ligand binding sites. [9]The more water-exposed Trp134 site (in subdomain IB) displays approximately a threefold higher affinity for halothane compared with the Trp212 site (in subdomain IIA). [6]Armed with this initial structural information, it is possible to use well-established biophysical approaches to probe the changes that occur in the protein conformation and dynamics after anesthetic binding. Earlier studies have indicated that anesthetic binding to proteins does not cause any detectable change in protein secondary structure, [6,8,10,11]suggesting that anesthetic binding is associated with more subtle effects on protein structure, presumably at the tertiary level, or perhaps by altering protein dynamics.

The rigid three-dimensional crystal structure of a protein represents a time-averaged equilibrium conformation. Proteins at physiologic temperatures in solution, however, are in reality dynamic entities, with the backbone and side chains in continuous motion. [12]Therefore, there is considerable internal flexibility around bonds between atoms because of random thermal motion as shown in Figure 1, with motion being constrained and modulated by neighboring residues, or perhaps by the binding of ligands.

One way to quantify protein dynamics (on the nanosecond time scale) is to measure the fluorescence anisotropy [14]of the two tryptophan residues in BSA and to determine the effect of added anesthetic agent. The fluorescence anisotropy is a measure of the average angular displacement (i.e., the mobility) of the indole side chains occurring during the absorption and subsequent emission of a photon. [14]Such alterations in side-chain mobility after anesthetic complexation may represent one of the fundamental molecular mechanisms whereby anesthetic agents ultimately alter protein function. In addition, anesthetic binding may alter protein stability [15,16]by perturbing the equilibrium between the native folded form of the protein target and various partially or fully unfolded conformations. This possibility was examined by thermally denaturing BSA in the absence and presence of the volatile general anesthetic agents halothane and isoflurane. Again, the results of these experiments suggest a basic mechanism whereby a bound anesthetic molecule might alter protein function by decreasing the flexibility of the protein.


Halothane (2-bromo-2-chloro-1,1,1-trifluoroethane) was obtained from Halocarbon Laboratories (Hackensack, NJ). The thymol preservative present in the commercial halothane was removed with an aluminum oxide column. [6]Isoflurane (1-chloro-2,2,2-trifluoroethyl difluoromethyl ether) was purchased from Ohmeda PPD, Inc. (Liberty Corner, NJ). The nonimmobilizer 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane was obtained from PCR Incorporated (Gainesville, FL). Fatty acid-free BSA (lot 119F9306) and myoglobin (lot 56F9306, from horse skeletal muscle) were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). Guanidinium chloride (8.0 M) was obtained from Pierce (Rockford, IL). All other chemicals were reagent grade.

The buffer used for all experimentation was 130 mM sodium chloride, 20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.0. Protein solutions were equilibrated with halothane and isoflurane in gas-tight Hamilton (Reno, NV) syringes. Anesthetic-equilibrated protein was diluted with predetermined volumes of plain protein (not exposed to anesthetic agent but otherwise treated in the same manner) to achieve the final anesthetic concentrations shown in Figure 2, Figure 4, Figure 8and Figure 10. Equilibration of BSA with the nonimmobilizer 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane was performed in the same manner.

Bovine serum albumin and myoglobin were used without further purification (purity >95% by electrophoresis). Myoglobin contains two tryptophan residues, at positions 7 and 14. [17]Protein concentrations were determined as described [6]after solutions were passed through 0.2 [micro sign]m nylon syringe filters (Gelman Sciences, Ann Arbor, MI).

Measurements of Fluorescence Anisotropy

The fluorescence anisotropy of BSA (5 [micro sign]M) was measured at 360 nm (bandwidth 8 nm) after selective excitation of tryptophan residues at 295 nm (bandwidth 2 nm) with a xenon arc lamp on a K2 multifrequency cross-correlation phase and modulation spectrofluorometer (ISS Inc., Champaign, IL), equipped with Glan-Thompson prism polarizers. A 320-nm emission cut-on filter was used to minimize the transmission of scattered excitation light. Anisotropy (r) was defined as Equation 1where I sub [double vertical bar] and I sub [perpendicular] are the emission intensities polarized parallel and perpendicular to the excitation, respectively. [14]During these conditions, grating (g) values, which correct for emission monochromator polarization effects, [18]ranged from 0.99-1.01. Polarizer alignment was verified [14]with a dilute solution of glycogen in deionized water, yielding an r value of 0.98-1.00 (n = 4). The temperature of the cell holder was controlled with a Haake F3 (Berlin, Germany) waterbath.

The concentration dependence of the anesthetic-induced fluorescence anisotropy change was fit using the following relationship:Equation 2where r is the measured fluorescence anisotropy, r1is the fluorescence anisotropy in the absence of added anesthetic agent, r2is the additional limiting fluorescence anisotropy at an infinite anesthetic concentration, [A] is the anesthetic concentration, and Kdis the average dissociation constant for the anesthetic-protein interaction.

Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy

Steady-state near-ultraviolet spectra (240-330 nm) were recorded with a Model 62 DS spectropolarimeter (Aviv, Lakewood, NJ), using 10-mm path length quartz cells, sealed with Teflon stoppers. The cell holder was temperature controlled at 25 +/− 0.1 [degree sign]C. The bandwidth was 1.00 nm, with a scan step of 0.5 nm and an average scan time of 3.0 s.

Thermal denaturation of albumin (22 [micro sign]M) was followed by circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy, measuring the ellipticity at 270 nm (Theta270nm) as a function of temperature. The Theta270nmwas measured at 1 [degree sign] intervals over the temperature range 50-75 [degree sign]C. The bandwidth was 1.00 nm, temperature equilibration time was 2 min, and the measurement time was 10 s.

For each run, the ellipticity (Theta) versus temperature (T) was fit using the relationship:Equation 3where R is the gas constant (1.987 cal/mol K) and T and Tm(defined later) are in kelvins. We thus obtained best fit values for the six parameters En, mn, Eu, mu, Delta H, and Tm. This formula describes a standard model for protein unfolding. [19]In this model, the ellipticity at any temperature is given by Theta = Thetanfn+ Thetaufu, where Thetanand Thetaurepresent the ellipticity of the native and unfolded states, respectively, and fnand furepresent the fraction of protein in the native and unfolded states, respectively (fn+ fu= 1). At low temperatures, in the pretransition region, fuis close to zero, and Theta [almost equal to] Thetan, which is assumed to be a linear function of temperature (Thetan= En+ mn[middle dot] T). At high temperatures, in the posttransition region, fuis close to 1, and Theta [almost equal to] Thetau, which also is assumed to be a linear function of temperature (Thetau= Eu+ mu[middle dot] T). In the intermediate transition region, fuvaries with temperature such that the equilibrium constant for protein unfolding, K = fu/fn, satisfies the relationship:Equation 4

(Equation 4) describes an equilibrium with midpoint temperature Tm(at which point K = 1; i.e., fu= fn= 0.5), and - Delta H/R is the slope of the van't Hoff plot (lnK vs. 1/T). The enthalpy change for protein unfolding (Delta H) describes how sharply the unfolding equilibrium varies with temperature. Thus, for each experiment, a single fitting determined (1) the pre- and posttransition baseline values for Theta (n) and Thetau, so the fraction unfolded (fu) at each temperature could be calculated from the data using the formula fu=(Theta - Theta (n))/(Thetau- Thetan), [19]and (2) the parameters Tmand Delta H for determining the unfolding equilibrium constant at any temperature using Equation 4.

The dependence of Tmon anesthetic concentration, in conjunction with a value for Delta H, furnishes information about anesthetic binding parameters. We denote the unfolding equilibrium constant and midpoint temperatures in the absence of anesthetic agent by Tm0and K0, and those in the presence of anesthetic by Tmand Kapp, in corcordance with the terminology used previously. [20]The normalized constant was calculated from the Tmand Delta H results using the equation Equation 5which follows from Equation 4evaluated at a temperature halfway between Tm0and Tm. Assuming that the native state of BSA has a single binding site for anesthetic agent A with dissociation constant Kd, and the unfolded state lacks this binding site, then the normalized unfolding equilibrium constant will be Equation 6

That is, the slope of a plot of K0/Kappversus [A] gives the dissociation constant of the anesthetic-protein complex.

Gas Chromatography

Buffer concentrations of halothane, isoflurane, and 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane were determined using gas chromatography on an HP 6890 Series instrument (Hewlett Packard, Wilmington, DE), as described. [8,11,21] 

Curve Fitting and Statistics

Best fit curves were generated with the KaleidaGraph (Abelbeck Software, Reading, PA) program, and MicroCal Origin 2.9 (MicroCal Software, Inc., Northampton, MA). Data are expressed as mean +/− SEM.

Changes in Bovine Serum Albumin Fluorescence Anisotropy Associated with Anesthetic Binding

Earlier work using steady-state and time-resolved fluorescence measurements [6,8]and direct photoaffinity labeling [7]has implicated the IB and the IIA subdomains of BSA as volatile anesthetic binding sites. The effect of binding of halothane and isoflurane to the IB and IIA sites in BSA, each of which contains a single tryptophan residue, was examined using fluorescence anisotrophy measurements. Figure 2shows that both anesthetic agents cause a concentration-dependent increase in the tryptophan fluorescence anisotropy of the protein. For both agents, the data have been fit using Equation 2, yielding Kdvalues of 1.6 +/− 0.4 and 1.3 +/− 0.3 mM for isoflurane and halothane, respectively. Degassing of samples with nitrogen to remove added anesthetic agent resulted in a return of the tryptophan fluorescence anisotropy to control values. Serial dilution of the protein causes no change in the fluorescence anisotropy (although there is a progressive linear change in the steady-state fluorescence intensity), indicating that turbidity-induced light scattering is negligible over the protein concentration range 0.5-10.0 [micro sign]M and is not responsible for the observed increase in the fluorescence anisotropy in the presence of the volatile anesthetic agents (data not shown).

Effect of the Nonimmobilizer 1,2-Dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane on Bovine Serum Albumin Fluorescence Anisotropy

Polyhalogenated molecules that fail to act like conventional volatile general anesthetic agents have been introduced recently [22]and are termed nonimmobilizers. These compounds may serve as tools to test the utility of various model systems currently in use to understand mechanisms of anesthetic action. One example of a nonimmobilizer is 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane. [22]This compound recently was shown to bind to human serum albumin [23]using steady-state tryptophan fluorescence measurements to determine binding. [6] Figure 3A shows the effect of 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane on BSA steady-state tryptophan fluorescence. There is a concentration-dependent quenching associated with binding of the nonimmobilizer to BSA, with a maximum quenching of 31 +/− 3%(n = 3) of the tryptophan fluorescence, at a saturating aqueous concentration of 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane of 180 +/− 30 [micro sign]M (n = 8). Figure 3B shows that binding of the nonimmobilizer 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane to BSA is not associated with any apparent change in the fluorescence anisotropy of the tryptophan residues.

Effect of Anesthetic Agents on Myoglobin Fluorescence Anisotropy

Experiments were performed with myoglobin to test the specificity of the anesthetic-induced change in the tryptophan fluorescence anisotropy of albumin. Myoglobin also contains two tryptophan residues but has been shown previously not to bind halothane. [6,24] Figure 4shows the lack of effect of halothane and isoflurane on myoglobin tryptophan fluorescence anisotropy. Therefore, in contrast to what is observed with albumin, the anesthetic agents have no effect on the myoglobin tryptophan fluorescence anisotropy, indicating an absence of binding to the native, folded form of myoglobin.

Effect of Temperature on Protein Tryptophan Fluorescence Anisotropy

Induced hypothermia has been shown to decrease anesthetic requirements. [25]The effect of temperature on the tryptophan fluorescence anisotropy of BSA was examined and is shown in Figure 5. There is a progressive decrease in the fluorescence anisotropy (reflecting an increase in the mobility of the tryptophan residues) as the temperature is increased from 8 to 38 [degree sign]C. The effect of the bound anesthetic agents on indole ring mobility in BSA (Figure 2) is therefore comparable to what results from decreasing the temperature of the protein solution.

Effect of Bound Anesthetic Agents on Protein Stability as Assessed by Near-ultraviolet Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy

Circular dichroism is a form of spectrophotometry that makes use of polarized light and may give rise to positive and negative absorption bands that are conformation dependent. The differential absorption of left and right circularly polarized light after passing through a solution of optically active material (e.g., a protein) results in the transmission of elliptically polarized light. Near-ultraviolet (i.e., 250-330 nm) CD spectra reflect protein tertiary structure [26]and were obtained to examine further the effect of anesthetic agents on the local environment of the aromatic residues in BSA. The motionally constrained tryptophan, tyrosine, and phenylalanine side chains in the native folded form of albumin give rise to the CD spectra shown in Figure 6A with broad negative transitions in the 255- to 300-nm range. Adding either halothane or isoflurane to albumin results in only minor changes in these steady-state spectra, suggesting the absence of major structural changes (data not shown). In contrast, elimination of protein tertiary structural contacts by adding 4 M guanidinium chloride leads to the loss of most of the near-ultraviolet CD signal (Figure 6B) as the aromatic side chains are freed to assume additional conformations around the C sup [small alpha, Greek]-C sup [small beta, Greek] and C sup [small beta, Greek]-C sup [small gamma, Greek] bonds (Figure 1).

Thermal Denaturation of Bovine Serum Albumin as Followed by Near-ultraviolet Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy

Anesthetic binding to BSA has minimal effects on the steady-state near-ultraviolet CD signal arising from the aromatic residues. Changes in the dynamics of the protein are apparent, however, because the bound anesthetic agent increases the tryptophan fluorescence anisotropy. To further investigate the effect of halothane and isoflurane binding on BSA dynamics, thermal denaturation (unfolding) of BSA was performed in the presence of the anesthetic agents.

In the absence of anesthetic agent, Tmfor albumin unfolding averaged 61.3 +/− 0.2 [degree sign]C (n = 4) for the isoflurane controls and 61.9 +/− 0.1 [degree sign]C (n = 4) for the halothane controls. Halothane and isoflurane increase Tmas shown in Figure 7. This finding implies that an increase in the overall stability of the native folded protein is observed in the presence of the anesthetic agent, with a shift of the thermal transition to higher temperatures in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 8).

The increase in Tmwas accompanied by an increase in Delta H for unfolding as predicted, because d(Delta H)/dT = Delta Cp(the change in the heat capacity) is positive for protein unfolding, because of the exposure of previously buried hydrophobic residues to water. [27] Figure 9shows the best fit lines for Delta H versus Tm, yielding Delta H = 157 + 5.6(Tm- 61.3) for isoflurane and Delta H = 158 + 5.7(Tm- 61.9) for halothane, where Delta H is in kcal/mol and Tmis in [degree sign]C. These values for Delta H were used in Equation 5to calculate the normalized equilibrium constant K0/Kapp, which was plotted against the anesthetic concentration, as shown in Figure 10, allowing calculation of dissociation constants for the anesthetics. Best fits to the data in Figure 10yield Kdvalues of 0.98 +/− 0.10 mM for isoflurane and 1.0 +/− 0.1 mM for halothane.

The goal of this study was to gain an understanding of fundamental mechanisms whereby a bound anesthetic molecule on a protein might modify protein function. The effect of bound anesthetic agents on protein dynamics and stability was examined because of the intimate link between protein flexibility and function. [28]Bovine serum albumin was selected as the model anesthetic binding protein because there is a growing literature supporting direct interactions of various volatile anesthetic agents with this protein using several different techniques, such as19F-NMR spectroscopy, [4,29,30]direct photoaffinity labeling, [5,7]fluorescence spectroscopy, [6,8]differential scanning calorimetry, [15]and isothermal titration calorimetry. [31]Although BSA is clearly not of direct relevance to the anesthetic state, it is predicted that the types of interactions with model systems apply equally well to in vivo sites of action, such as the large multiple subunit membrane proteins, which are not currently amenable to detailed biophysical analyses.

Two volatile general anesthetic agents that bind to BSA were found to cause an increase in the fluorescence anisotropy of the tryptophan residues. Fluorescence depolarization of protein tryptophan side chains may result from three distinct processes:(1) Brownian rotational diffusion of the protein as a whole;(2) internal fluctuations of the indole rings relative to the protein backbone; and (3) energy transfer between excited state moieties. [32]The contribution of Brownian rotational diffusion is small in the case of a relatively large protein such as albumin (66 kDa) because the average excited state lifetime of the tryptophan residues of 6.1 ns [33]is short compared with the rotational correlation time of albumin of 42 ns, [34]implying that no significant rotational diffusion occurs before fluorescence emission. This follows from the Perrin Equation r(o/r)= 1 +([small tau, Greek]/[small phi, Greek]), where rois the limiting fluorophore anisotropy in the absence of rotational diffusion, [small tau, Greek] is the fluorescence lifetime, and [small phi, Greek] is the rotational correlation time. [14]Because [small phi, Greek] much > [small tau, Greek], the measured anisotropy r approximates ro. Energy transfer between tyrosine and tryptophan residues was minimized by selecting an excitation wavelength of 295 nm. Further, the effect of energy transfer is to decrease fluorescence anisotropy. Although it is not possible to completely exclude energy transfer at this point, it is concluded that the main effect of halothane and isoflurane binding to BSA is to decrease the mobility of the indole rings. In the absence of anesthetic agent, the rotations of the indole rings are limited by van der Waals repulsions because of collisions with neighboring residues. The presence of the bound anesthetic agent therefore further increases the likelihood that the indole rings will experience steric inhibition to rotation about the dihedral angles chi1and [chi squared](Figure 1).

The anesthetic-induced attenuation of indole ring mobility in BSA is not reproduced by the nonimmobilizer 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane, despite apparent binding to the same site(s) in the protein occupied by anesthetic molecules, as determined by steady-state fluorescence measurements. Although 1,2-dichlorohexafluorocyclobutane is a direct quencher of indole fluorescence, [35]it is possible that the observed quenching of BSA steady-state tryptophan fluorescence by the nonimmobilizer is secondary to binding at different sites in subdomains IB and IIA than those favored by anesthetic molecules. Alternatively, the changes in steady-state tryptophan fluorescence and lack of effect on fluorescence anisotropy may reflect preferential binding of the nonimmobilizer to a partially unfolded conformation of BSA rather than to the native protein conformation.

The measurement of the tryptophan fluorescence anisotropy of BSA as a function of added anesthetic agent allowed a quantification of the binding energetics of isoflurane and halothane. Figure 2A shows that isoflurane binds with a Kdof 1.6 +/− 0.4 mM. This value is comparable to the Kdvalues of 1.4 +/− 0.2 and 1.3 +/− 0.2 mM determined using19F-NMR spectroscopy [4,30]and the value of 1.5 +/− 0.2 mM reported by Eckenhoff and Shuman [5]using photoaffinity labeling. Halothane bound to BSA with a Kdvalue of 1.3 +/− 0.3 mM using fluorescence anisotropy measurements (Figure 2B), again comparable to the value of 1.3 +/− 0.2 mM obtained using19F-NMR spectroscopy, [29]the value of 1.8 +/− 0.2 mM determined using intrinsic fluorescence quenching measurements, [6]and the value of 0.3-0.5 mM reported using photoaffinity labeling. [5]The thermal denaturation experiments yielded Kdvalues of 0.98 +/− 0.10 mM for isoflurane and 1.0 +/− 0.1 mM for halothane, in reasonable agreement with the studies cited here.

Anesthetic binding therefore has a stabilizing effect on BSA, in terms of local dynamics and global stability. This findings is in agreement with the effect of anesthetic agents on global BSA stability as measured by differential scanning calorimetry. [15]The effect of anesthetic agents on protein dynamics suggests a plausible mechanism for how anesthetic binding to proteins may alter protein function. The folded, biologically active, conformations of proteins are only marginally more stable (5-10 kcal/mol) than their unfolded counterparts, [36]a situation believed to have evolved to allow the structural changes required for normal protein function. [37]The ability of both protein receptors to bind ligands, and for enzymes to transform substrates, is dependent on protein motion. [28]Any alteration in the stability of a given conformational substate is predicted to alter the equilibrium between the different conformations, by raising the free energy barrier for subsequent conformational changes required for function. By limiting protein dynamics, volatile general anesthetic agents might alter the binding of native ligands to their receptors and thus disturb the function of central nervous system membrane proteins. This concept is shown schematically in Figure 11, in which the binding of successive anesthetic molecules to the protein results in additional stabilizing forces, trapping the protein in progressively lower free energy minima. Random thermal motion at physiologic temperatures in the presence of a bound anesthetic molecule therefore becomes insufficient to allow the protein to change into the active conformation. Experimental evidence for this concept is provided by work on the Torpedo nobiliana nicotinic acetylcholine receptor showing that general anesthetic agents increase the proportion of receptors in the desensitized state. [38]Bound volatile general anesthetic agents therefore may perturb the equilibrium between conformational substates of the protein.

It should be noted that the binding location of the anesthetic agent and the natural substrate need not be the same for apparent competition to occur. Binding of the anesthetic agent at one site may alter backbone dynamics at distant sites in the protein, preventing substrate binding, as seen in the case of the trp aporepressor protein after tryptophan binding. [39]In the latter case, this change in dynamics at distant sites is not accompanied by changes in secondary structure and may instead involve changes in the dihedral [small phi, Greek] and [small psi, Greek] angles (describing the rotations about the N-C sup [small alpha, Greek] and C sup [small alpha, Greek]-C' bonds, respectively;Figure 1) along the backbone without the breaking of hydrogen bonds. Similarly, binding of 1,2-dichloroethane to insulin crystals displaces sulfate ions from a distant site in the protein. [40] 

The number of volatile anesthetic binding sites on BSA is controversial but ranges from two [6-8]to four [4]and clearly depends on the aqueous concentration of agent. Therefore, at the lower anesthetic concentrations examined in the current study, only a single binding site was determined based on the thermal denaturation data. Occupancy of the site(s), although not associated with changes in protein secondary structure, [6,8]presumably causes some local, more subtle, structural or dynamic changes because the binding of other ligands such as thiopental, [41]coumadin, [42]and bilirubin [43]is altered by volatile anesthetic agents. Of these, both coumadin and bilirubin bind to the same IIA subdomain as halothane. [44]This finding suggests that volatile anesthetic binding to proteins may compete with binding of endogenous ligands as previously suggested. [45]As indicated earlier, however, this is not necessarily attributable to competition for occupancy of exactly the same physical site on the protein.

Anesthetic agents have been shown previously to have a fluidizing effect on lipid bilayers. [46]The finding that halothane and isoflurane have the opposite effect on local protein dynamics and global stability suggests that the interaction with protein targets may be fundamentally different. Protein stability is generally increased on ligand binding, as reflected by measures of dynamics such as fluorescence anisotropy, [47]hydrogen-deuterium exchange, [39]and Debye-Waller factors. [48]In this regard, halothane and isoflurane appear to behave like conventional ligands. Further work is needed, however, to confirm this finding because in the case of firefly luciferase there is evidence that anesthetic agents actually destabilize the protein and bind most favorably to a partially unfolded conformation. [16]Nevertheless, anesthetic-induced attenuation of protein dynamics as described in the current study and by others [24]is compatible with the clinical observations that (1) hypothermia decreases anesthetic requirements, [25]and (2) increased pressures, which denature proteins, [49]reverse the effects of anesthetic agents. [50] 

The authors thank Dr. Roderic G. Eckenhoff for helpful discussions.

Eckenhoff RG, Johansson JS: Molecular interactions between inhaled anesthetics and proteins. Pharmacol Rev 1997; 49:343-67
Mihic SJ, Ye Q, Wick MJ, Koltchine VV, Krasowski MD, Finn SE, Mascia MP, Valenzuela CF, Hanson KK, Greenblatt EP, Harris RA, Harrison NL: Sites of alcohol and volatile anaesthetic action on GABAAand glycine receptors. Nature 1997; 389:385-9
Jevtovic-Todorovic V, Todorovic SM, Mennerick S, Powell S, Dikranian K, Benshoff N, Zorumski CF, Olney JW: Nitrous oxide (laughing gas) is an NMDA antagonist, neuroprotectant and neurotoxin. Nature Med 1998; 4:460-3
Dubois BW, Evers AS:19F-NMR spin-spin relaxation (T2) method for characterizing anesthetic binding to proteins: Analysis of isoflurane binding to albumin. Biochemistry 1992; 31:7069-76
Eckenhoff RG, Shuman H: Halothane binding to soluble proteins determined by photoaffinity labeling. Anesthesiology 1993; 79:96-106
Johansson JS, Eckenhoff RG, Dutton PL: Binding of halothane to serum albumin demonstrated using tryptophan fluorescence. Anesthesiology 1995; 83:316-24
Eckenhoff RG: Amino acid resolution of halothane binding sites in serum albumin. J Biol Chem 1996; 271:15521-6
Johansson JS: Binding of the volatile anesthetic chloroform to albumin demonstrated using tryptophan fluorescence quenching. J Biol Chem 1997; 272:17961-5
Peters T: Serum albumin. Adv Protein Chem 1985; 37:161-245
Johansson JS, Eckenhoff RG: Minimum structural requirement for an inhalational anesthetic binding site on a protein target. Biochim Biophys Acta 1996; 1290:63-8
Johansson JS, Rabanal F, Dutton PL: Binding of the volatile anesthetic halothane to the hydrophobic core of a tetra-[small alpha, Greek]-helix bundle protein. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1996; 279:56-61
Jardetzky O: Protein dynamics and conformational transitions in allosteric proteins. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 1996; 65:171-219
Demchenko AP: Fluorescence and dynamics in proteins, Topics in Fluorescence Spectroscopy, Volume 3, Biochemical Applications. Edited by Lakowicz JR. New York, Plenum Press, 1992, p 68
Lakowicz JR: Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy. New York, Plenum Press, 1983
Tanner JW, Eckenhoff RG, Liebman PA: Protein stabilization by an inhalational anesthetic agent (abstract). Biophys J 1997; 72:A417
Ueda I, Suzuki A: Irreversible phase transition of firefly luciferase: Contrasting effects of volatile anesthetics and myristic acid. Biochim Biophys Acta 1998; 1380:313-9
Postnikova GB, Komarov YE, Yumakova EM: Fluorescence study of the conformational properties of myoglobin structure. Eur J Biochem 1991; 198:223-32
Eftink M: Quenching-resolved emission anisotropy studies with single and multitryptophan-containing proteins. Biophys J 1983; 43:323-34
Pace CN, Scholtz JM: Measuring the conformational stability of a protein, Protein Structure: A Practical Approach. 2nd edition. Edited by Creighton TE. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1997, pp 299-321
Gonzalez L, Plecs JJ, Alber T: An engineered allosteric switch in leucine-zipper oligomerization. Nature Struct Biol 1996; 3:510-5
Johansson JS, Gibney BR, Rabanal F, Reddy KS, Dutton PL: A designed cavity in the hydrophobic core of a four-[small alpha, Greek]-helix bundle improves volatile anesthetic binding affinity. Biochemistry 1998; 37:1421-9
Koblin DD, Chortkoff BS, Laster MJ, Eger EI, Halsey MJ, Ionescu P: Polyhalogenated and perfluorinated compounds that disobey the Meyer-Overton hypothesis. Anesth Analg 1994; 79:1043-8
Forman SA, Raines DE: Nonanesthetic volatile drugs obey the Meyer-Overton correlation in two molecular protein site models. Anesthesiology 1998; 88:1535-48
Eckenhoff RG, Tanner JW: Differential halothane binding and effects on serum albumin and myoglobin. Biophys J 1998; 75:477-83
Vitez TS, White PF, Eger EI: Effects of hypothermia on halothane MAC and isoflurane MAC in the rat. Anesthesiology 1974; 41:80-1
Strickland EH: Aromatic contributions to circular dichroism spectra of proteins. CRC Crit Rev Biochem 1972; 2:113-75
Shortle D, Meeker AK, Freire E: Stability mutants of Staphylococcal nuclease: Large compensating enthalpy-entropy changes for the reversible denaturation reaction. Biochemistry 1988; 27:4761-8
Frauenfelder H, Sligar SG, Wolynes PG: The energy landscapes and motions of proteins. Science 1991; 254:1598-1603
Dubois BW, Cherian SF, Evers AS: Volatile anesthetics compete for common binding sites on bovine serum albumin: A19F-NMR study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1993; 90:6478-82
Xu Y, Tang P, Firestone L, Zhang TT:19F nuclear magnetic resonance investigation of stereoselective binding of isoflurane to bovine serum albumin. Biophys J 1996; 70:532-8
Ueda I, Yamanaka M: Titration calorimetry of anesthetic-protein interaction: Negative enthalpy of binding and anesthetic potency. Biophys J 1997; 72:1812-7
Teichberg VI, Shinitzky M: Fluorescence polarization studies of lysozyme and lysozyme-saccharide complexes. J Mol Biol 1973; 74:519-31
Lakowicz JR, Weber G: Nanosecond segmental mobilities of tryptophan residues in proteins observed by lifetime-resolved fluorescence anisotropies. Biophys J 1980; 32:591-601
Yguerabide J, Epstein HF, Stryer L: Segmental flexibility in an antibody molecule. J Mol Biol 1970; 51:573-90
Johansson JS: Nonanesthetic haloalkanes and nicotinic acetylcholine receptor desensitization kinetics (letter). Anesthesiology 1996; 85:430-1
Pace CN, Shirley BA, McNutt M, Gajiwala K: Forces contributing to the conformational stability of proteins. FASEB J 1996; 10:75-83
Richards FM, Lim WA: An analysis of packing in the protein folding problem. Q Rev Biophys 1994; 26:423-98
Raines DE, Rankin SE, Miller KW: General anesthetics modify the kinetics of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor desensitization at clinically relevant concentrations. Anesthesiology 1995; 82:276-87
Finucane MD, Jardetzky O: Mechanism of hydrogen-deuterium exchange in trp repressor studied by1H-(15) N NMR. J Mol Biol 1995; 253:576-89
Gursky O, Fontano E, Bhyravbhatla B, Caspar DLD: Stereospecific dihaloalkane binding in a pH-sensitive cavity in cubic insulin crystals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994; 91:12388-92
Buch HP, Altmeyer P, Buch U: Thiopental binding to human serum albumin in the presence of halothane. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1990; 34:35-40
Calvo R, Aguilera L, Suarez E, Rodriguez-Sasiain JM: Displacement of warfarin from human serum albumin by halothane anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1989; 33:575-7
McDonagh AF, Pu YM, Lightner DA: Effect of volatile anesthetics on the circular dischroism of bilirubin bound to human serum albumin. Experientia 1992; 48:246-8
He XM, Carter DC: Atomic structure and chemistry of human serum albumin. Nature 1992; 358:209-15
Franks NP, Lieb WR: Do general anaesthetics act by competitive binding to specific receptors? Nature 1984; 310:599-601
Trudell JR: A unitary theory of anesthesia based on lateral phase separations in nerve membranes. Anesthesiology 1977; 46:5-10
Lee J, Pilch PF, Shoelson SE, Scarlata SF: Conformational changes in the insulin receptor upon insulin binding and activation as monitored by fluorescence spectroscopy. Biochemistry 1997; 36:2701-8
Kurumbail RG, Stevens AM, Gierse JK, McDonald JJ, Stegeman RA, Pak JY, Gildehaus D, Miyashiro JM, Penning TD, Seibert K, Isakson PC, Stallings WC: Structural basis for selective inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 by anti-inflammatory agents. Nature 1996; 384:644-8
Silva JL, Weber G: Pressure stability of proteins. Annu Rev Phys Chem 1993; 44:89-113
Wann KT, MacDonald AG: Actions and interactions of high pressure and general anaesthetics. Prog Neurobiol 1988; 30:271-307